On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission pointed to Microsoftâs recent pricing overhaul of Xbox Game Pass as evidence of the harm its merger with Activision Blizzard has had on consumers. The agency filed a new letter in its ongoing appeal of last yearâs deal, calling the changes âexactly the sort of consumer harm from the merger that the FTC alleged.â
Despite losing its lawsuit seeking an injunction to freeze Microsoftâs purchase of Activision Blizzard in July 2023, the FTC appealed the decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While it awaits a final decision from those justices, the FTCâs been filing additional evidence to support its claims that the merger would hurt competition in gaming and hurt customers, including a letter from earlier this year after Microsoft laid off nearly 2,000 employees across the newly acquired teams.
Todayâs letter (via Games Fray) tries to use Microsoftâs recent messy changes to Game Pass to support its case, pointing to the fact that Game Pass for Console is going away for new and lapsed subscribers and will be replaced by a more expensive âStandardâ bundle that doesnât include day-one releases like this fallâs Call of Duty: Black Ops 6, acquired as part of the Activision deal. The result is that only the Game Pass Ultimate subscription, which is now $20 a month, will include access to all Game Pass games.
Quick and dirty chart by me to display the new Xbox Game Pass structure (subject to correction).
I hope this helps. pic.twitter.com/Qj6CX7i4kG
— Klobrille (@klobrille) July 10, 2024
âMicrosoftâs price increases and product degradationâcombined with Microsoftâs reduced investments in output and product quality via employee layoffs, see FTCâs February 7, 2024, Letterâare the hallmarks of a firm exercising market power post-merger,â the FTC writes. It also points to a statement Microsoft made in its filings during the trial last summer suggesting Game Pass wouldnât get more expensive just because Activision Blizzardâs games were added to it.
âHere, the acquisition would benefit consumers by making [Call of Duty] available on Microsoftâs Game Pass on the day it is released on console (with no price increase for the service based on the acquisition),â the company wrote at the time. That specific quote made the rounds on several websites, and has since appeared to be contradicted by this monthâs steep price increases, though Microsoft could probably try to argue that it wasnât the acquisition directly that spurred the overhaul but a larger strategy shift around its subscription service business.
âMicrosoftâs post-merger actions thus vindicate the congressional design of preliminarily halting mergers to fully evaluate their likely competitive effects, and judicial skepticism of promises inconsistent with a firmâs economic incentives,â the FTCâs letter concludes. Itâs not clear when a final decision in the appeal will be issued, and itâs hard to fathom what the consequences would be if Microsoft ended up losing. It would no doubt be even messier and more confusing than its Game Pass overhaul.
  Â