Black Friday Is Almost Here!
The Inventory team is rounding up deals you don’t want to miss, now through Cyber Monday. Click here to browse!

Warren Spector Sure Wishes Metacritic Was Less Relevant

Illustration for article titled Warren Spector Sure Wishes Metacritic Was Less Relevant

Add Deus Ex and Epic Mickey creator Warren Spector to the list of people who think the video game industry should stop caring so much about Metacritic.


In his column for this week, Spector goes after Metacritic, a website that aggregates review scores for movies and video games and ranks them with a single number, or Metascore. Spector criticizes the video game publishers and developers that treat those Metascores like holy numbers and use them to affect bonuses and contracts.

"Metacritic, at best, rewards games that are conventional and well understood by players and critics alike," Spector writes. "New and challenging things are, by their very nature, disruptive and easily misunderstood. Aggregation of opinion, at best, offers hope and guidance to people whose goal is to maximize profitability but little to people whose priorities lie elsewhere or who depend on the constancy and relative predictability of the status quo."


Spector's column is smart, and worth reading. It also doesn't touch upon one important point: both video game publishers and developers manipulate Metacritic scores to serve their own goals. The problems with Metacritic's influence on the game industry—even beyond the flawed idea that a game's quality can be summed up with a number—are deep and entrenched.

For more, check out our in-depth investigation into the serious flaws of how the video game industry uses Metacritic.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Never understood the Metacritic hate, it's just average of reviewers scores. It's not fudging the numbers or making one opinion worth more then another. It's just an average. It's math.

Now how those numbers are intereppreted by publishers are a whole other thing. But even if Metacritic was erased today, publishers would simply bookmark every review site and calculate the average on their own and make the very same decisions they are making now.

When I go to Metacritic, I read the top 3 reviews and bottom 3 reviews. Sometimes I notice things like with Halo 2 Reviews... "long load times, texture pop ins, incomplete game" in Top 3 reviews and realized it's biased. This high score is probably heavily biased. But then I see things like FarCry3: Blood Dragon, the WORST 3 reviews say things like... "Short but insanely funny, don't recall laughing this much" then I know I got a good fun time in this game regardless of how bad it might be gameplay wise.