Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

The First Witcher Game Has Not Aged Well

Illustration for article titled The First iWitcher/i Game Has Not Aged Well
Screenshot: CD Projekt Red (The Witcher)

2007’s The Witcher is a fascinating but flawed artifact from PC gaming’s past and that’s probably where it should stay.

Advertisement

I returned to the first video game entry in the popular fantasy series over the recent holiday break because, like a lot of other people, I’d just finished Netflix’s Witcher TV show and wanted to go back to where the adaptations started. While I found the familiar faces, voices, and grim fantasy-noir monster stories that make the Witcher-verse one of my favorites, I also ran into a tough-to-navigate UI, laughably bad character conversations, and a world whose beauty is hidden.

Having grown up with 8-bit games, I like to think I have a pretty high threshold for outdated graphics, but The Witcher is one of those games whose visual ambition at the time has led it tumbling down into the uncanny valley in the decade since.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled The First iWitcher/i Game Has Not Aged Well

There’s no other way around it: in this game Geralt has a horse face.

And he’s not the only one who looks extremely weird. The struggle to add as much detail and depth as possible with the tools available at the time has made a number of characters now look creepy. Vesemir looks like a wilted Sean Connery while Triss Merigold looks like a glassy, oblong mannequin. The little bespoke animations and camera flourishes that helped elevate The Witcher 2 and 3 are also missing. The results are clunky and stiff conversations like these:

Unlike the second two games, which used an in-house graphical engine, CD Projekct Red developed The Witcher using BioWare’s Aurora Engine. The studio has talked in the past about how much it struggled working within the confines of an engine designed for the isometric RPG Neverwinter Nights, and, especially in the year 2020, it shows. The Witcher can be played in a zoomed-out isometric view, close-up and over-the-shoulder, or a hybrid of the two, and roughly 10 hours into the game I’m still not sure which one is the least aggravating.

The isometric view utilizes the mouse for everything, making it easier to go back-and-forth between running around villages and checking your map and inventory. It makes you feel removed from the action, though, like you’re playing a strategy game. Over-the-shoulder makes maneuvering clumsier since your field of view is severely limited, but it looks the most like the third-person action that fans of The Witcher 3 have grown accustomed to seeing. In the end it’s easier to switch back and forth depending on whether you’re primarily in combat or completing fetch-quests, but it makes it hard to stay focused on the characters and story.

Advertisement

The game’s difficulty spikes and janky combat also make that hard. Thank the video game gods that saving whenever you want has been the longstanding default in PC games, because The Witcher is definitely one of those RPGs where any encounter can kill you if you get caught by surprise or accidently bite off more than you can chew. It’s satisfying to try and time sword attacks to break out into combos and keep switching between “schools” of witcher swordplay depending on the types of enemies you’re dealing with, but on more than one occassion a few misclicks have spelled my downfall.

Illustration for article titled The First iWitcher/i Game Has Not Aged Well
Advertisement

That’s not to say that there isn’t ultimately a lot to enjoy in developer CD Projekt Red’s first stab at a video game adaptation of Polish author Andrzej Sapkowski’s books. If you’ve come to love voice actor Doug Cockle’s version of Geralt as I have, the core of that performance—gruff, curt, and dry humored—is already going strong in the first game. The characters whose problems you’re tasked with solving also still have that bit of unexpected flare and roughness that have helped set the more recent Witcher games apart. No one is afraid to tell you to piss off in The Witcher if you say something that offends them, and there are no cookie-cutter heroes and villains.

There is filler though, and the game is padded with boring quests to kill mobs of enemies and pick herbs. Early on, Geralt finds himself navigating the sewers below the capital city of Temeriam and it’s as dull and tedious as anyone who has ever played the sewer portion of an RPG would expect. I trudged through those dank waters anyway, because I still have an insatiable appetite for anything Witcher-related I can get my hands on. And as a museum of lore that helps explain and build out the world of the Witcher 2 and 3, it has plenty to offer. The Old Friend of Mine quest alone is worth it for any mega fans who want to see Geralt party it up with all of his old pals. Everyone else is probably better off admiring what The Witcher accomplished from afar, or wait to see if it ever gets remade. 

Kotaku staff writer. You can reach him at ethan.gach@kotaku.com

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

I actually very recently decided to just work my way through the series, since I’ve had all three sitting in my steam library for ages and just never got around to any of them.

I’ve now decided that whatever story context I get from playing the first game is very much not worth it.

The janky combat and difficulty spikes are absolutely a part of it, but the main thing that killed it for me was the investigation quest. That is such an interwoven mess that it just sucks all the fun out of the game. I have no idea what I’m supposed to do and I certainly don’t care about the story anymore.

It just leaves you standing in the middle of town, bored and confused with a thousand vagues hints which you can’t follow up on because the requirements are all so baffingly interconnected.

I’m just gonna move on to the Witcher 2 and hope that’s less obnoxious.