Sherlock Is Less Impressive When You See His Mistakes

I love the BBC's Sherlock, but so many of his deductions come down to guessing extraordinary causes for mundane events. I guess including those times wouldn't make for such an impressive character.


While we're here, can we also talk about how many of Sherlock's incredible solutions involved being able to see a single fiber of cloth from across a room? Does the man have bionic eyes?

Sherlock Holmes Sucks At Deduction [Pete Holmes]

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


You guys have an unhealthy obsession with Pete Holmes. Is it fandom or sponsorship based?

I do agree with some of his points, that some of sherlocks clues come from luck and not deduction, but I feel like that's every detective ever.