After keeping his mouth shut for roughly two weeks, Logan Paul has finally opened up about his blockchain NFT âgame,â CryptoZoo, in a response video to investigative YouTuber Stephen âCoffeezillaâ Findeisen. However, if you were hoping for some sort of explanation of what went wrong with the project, youâll be sorely disappointed. Instead, Paul spends his time trying to discredit Coffeezillaâs sources and reporting, all while admitting that, yeah, many people on the project were âbad actorsâ and saying that his only mistake was trusting them. I take it back: Heâs not on his redemption arc.
Let me catch you up real quick. Coffeezilla, a YouTuber known for investigating fraudsters and scammers in the crypto space, spent a year looking into Logan Paul and his âreally fun game that makes you money,â CryptoZoo. This âgameâ was set up to generate passive income for players. You purchase the gameâs currency, zoo coins, to spend on egg NFTs that hatch into animals. You can breed these animals to make hybrids, with rarer ones yielding more zoo coins which can then be cashed out into IRL money. It sounded enticing in theory but was an apparent rug pull in practice, as members of Paulâs team (though not Paul himself) sold their coins early to make millions while Paulâs ardent fans and early investors lost hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to Coffeezillaâs reporting. Based on his three-part series, CryptoZoo seemed to be a sham.
Read More: YouTuber: Logan Paulâs NFT âGameâ Is A Big Crypto Scam
Logan Paul opted to remain silent during much of Coffeezillaâs reporting and posting, but not anymore! On January 3, Paul uploaded his response to Coffeezillaâs investigation on YouTube, saying he would âdefend himself with factsâ while hurling cutting insults like saying that Coffeezilla is continuing âto morph from an investigator to a gossip channelâ and calling him the âKeemstar of crypto in finance.â Oof, that one stings.
Anyway, in his response video, Paul focuses on what he calls three âdiscrepanciesâ in Coffeezillaâs reports. The first point was about the CryptoZoo developer who fled to Switzerland with the gameâs source code and held it hostage for $1 million dollars. Paul drags Coffeezilla for having kept the individual anonymous and calling him âZâ in his reports. Turns out this developerâs name is Zach Kelling and, according to Paul, he has âmultiple feloniesâ related to armed robbery and obstructing the legal process.
In his video, Paul displays papers purporting to be official documents from the Johnson County Court in Kansas referencing Kellingâs alleged criminal charges. (Kotaku couldnât independently verify these facts and the Johnson County District Court rep for the Records Office said that âthere were no public recordsâ for Zach Kelling.) Paul brings this up to cast aspersions on Kellingâs character and to insinuate that the things Kelling said in Coffeezillaâs videosâthat he had 30 engineers working under him and was burning $50,000 a week on the CryptoZoo projectâare completely false. According to Paul, he only had three engineers, not 30.
Paul then admits that, yep, he sure did work with this âunsavory individual,â but frames the error as one of being too trusting, saying âI guess thatâs what I get for trusting the team that I relied on to vet and manageâ the hiring process. He describes former CryptoZoo lead developer Eddie Ibanez as a âcon man who fooled billionaires, the Mormon Church, the owner of the New York Yankees, and now me.â
He then casts aspersions on yet another one of Coffeezillaâs sources, a man named Emilio who Coffeezilla interviewed for his reports. Paul suggests that Coffeezilla should have been aware that Emilio was an untrustworthy individual who was previously involved in two rug pulls, and thus a poor source for his reporting. Paul also takes a moment to challenge Coffeezillaâs claim that eggs in CryptoZoo cannot be hatched, saying âone second of researchâ would have proven otherwise and showing footage of the gameâs eggs âhatchingâ to reveal pictures of elephants, ducks, and other animals.
Finally, Paul hones in on a recorded phone call Coffeezilla had with Paulâs manager, Jeffrey Levin, parts of which were then used in Coffeezillaâs reports, supposedly without Levinâs permission. According to California laws under the invasion of privacy, it is illegal to record a conversation without all partiesâ consent because itâs a two-party consent state. This is the stickiest point in Paulâs litigious threat if they find themselves in court.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1buyQRWw8M
âAlthough you didnât verify any backgrounds, substantiate any evidence, took multiple criminalsâ words as truth, and broke laws, you still published the defamation,â Paul says before asserting that multiple âbad actorsâ have been removed from the project, and that he and his manager Jeff âmade no money and will never make any money on CryptoZoo. In fact, we only lost money trying to pick up the pieces.â
Logan Paul ends his video by assuring viewers that CryptoZoo is still coming, in defiance of Coffeezillaâs claims that itâs not actually being made. He also threatens Coffeezilla with legal action for the âdefamation,â saying he will need a good lawyer. However, Paulâs still open to having Coffeezilla appear on his podcast, Impaulsive
Kotaku reached out to Paul for comment.
In a brief email exchange with Kotaku, Coffeezilla reiterated what he said on Twitter about Paulâs response. He said a full reply is coming âwhen I organize my thoughtsâ while trading blows with Paul online over the minutiae of the year-long investigation.
âThe fact Logan is suing me instead of the criminals and con men he hired says it all,â Coffeezilla said. âHe took zero accountability. Zero apologies. He just wants to save his own reputation.â
As for Zach Kelling, Coffeezilla said he just learned of Kellingâs supposed past legal battles.
âThose âlegal battlesâ were from the early 2000’s (2001 I think?),â he said. âIf Loganâs standard of character is to dig back years to judge people by their lowest moment, I donât think thatâs a battle heâll win. Regardless, I have no stake in whether Zach Kelling is good or bad. I didnât hire him. My job as a journalist is to reach out to all parties. Logan had accused Zach of stealing his code. I reached out to Zach and got his story and then reached back out to Logan and his manager in response. Logan and his manager chose to not comment and then get upset when I quote the guy they hired.â
Logan Paul's response to Coffeezilla completely exposing his crypto currency scam has to be one of the funniest attempts at salvation I've ever seen.
His entire argument is basically that the people he worked with are actually way worse than CZ said so…checkmate? pic.twitter.com/3EwqLbGVnJ— The Serfs (youtube.com/theserftimes) (@theserfstv) January 4, 2023
As for how Paulâs response is being received, some online are mocking his tactic of pointing out that, whether intentionally or not, he hired fraudsters and scammers to work on CryptoZoo. In a reaction video, Twitch streamer Hasan Piker pauses amidst Paulâs claims to say, âNot a single person thinks that any of the people involved in this situation are good people. You hired âem, ya fuckinâ idiot!â Piker goes on to call Paulâs claims in the video âcompounding the Ls.â Yeah, thatâs definitely one way to look at it.
Â