Kinect Star Wars: The Kotaku Review

Image for article titled Kinect Star Wars: The Kotaku Review

If you know how to use the Internet, you will have little trouble finding people who will tell you that Kinect Star Wars is a bad video game. These people are correct. The combination of one popular thing (Star Wars!) with another popular thing (the magical hands-free Xbox 360 Kinect sensor!) has resulted in one foul ice-cream-lobster sundae.


The only challenge for me is to figure out how to blast this game—fairly—in a new, informative, illustrative way.

I will now make my first attempt:

This game controlled better, that is, half-decently, only once I started playing it with a Wii controller in my hand.

Too weird?

OK. Let's try again…

Kinect Star Wars is a collection of Star Wars-themed inter-activities that some would call games or others would call methods for teaching children to curse.

Let's distinguish from the howls I can agree with and the ones I think are wrong. This much-hyped project is not the sacrilege that some old, original-trilogy-loving grumps complain that it is. The allegedly-mortifying Cloud City dancing mode actually is the best part of the game. And it's fun! Those who can't smile at the opportunity to dance along with a virtual Han Solo or Boba Fett to some pop songs that have been re-written with Star Wars-themed lyrics are too miserable to take seriously. Your childhood has been ruined? Please. If your childhood involved loving A New Hope, then you already loved some cheese.

Image for article titled Kinect Star Wars: The Kotaku Review

WHY: Because you've got to do or do not, and all this is is a bad try.

Kinect Star Wars

Developer: Microsoft Game Studios, Terminal Reality, Good Science, Frontier Developments, Hyrdogen Whiskey, Panic Button Games (and more?)
Platforms: Xbox 360 (requires Kinect)
Released: April 3


Type of game: Gesture-controlled collection of Star Wars Jedi adventuring, Rancor-role-playing, Jabba-palace dancing, lightsaber dueling, and pod-racing.

What I played: Finished the campaign in three or four hours, danced through a dozen songs, did bits and pieces of other modes. Only had fun with the dancing.


Two Things I Liked

  • The promise of being able to hoist someone up with the Force by lifting my hand in front of my TV.
  • The execution of the goofball dancing mode, that lets you do "the trash compactor" or "the Jedi mind trick" while dancing along to Star Wars remixes of Christina Aguilera and other pop stars' hits, with Han, Leia, Lando or even Boba Fett dancing along with you.

Two Things I Hated

  • The execution of that lift-bad-guy-with-the-Force things.
  • All the other Jedi Kinect controls, too.

Made-to-Order Back-of-Box Quotes

  • "They should have delayed this game longer." -Stephen Totilo,
  • "Does anyone remember Enter The Matrix?" -Stephen Totilo,

I'm not, however, here to praise, Kinect Star Wars. I'm here to shake my head at it. I'm here to tell you that—this is important—the game's main mode is a mess. The "Jedi Destiny" adventure mode, a tedious storyline mode that sends you through land and space battles across the Star Wars universe, exposes Kinect for being the latest bandwagon tech that could benefit from that old Yoda advice about either doing or not doing and not wasting our time with half-baked trying.


Are you old enough to remember when companies first started having websites and the people who promote how wonderful milk is decided to have a website? This is like that: mis-use of new technology that reeks of some executives believing this is a marvelous idea.

The Kinect is, simply, a terrible interface for this game that replaces the fantasy of being a Jedi with the frustration of a game that seldom functions the way you would want it to.


The Kinect's failure, which I'll have to explain one hand at a time, ruins the game's main adventure mode, Jedi Destiny. This disastrous chronicle is a vaguely-interactive three or four-hour adventure that lets one or two Xbox Kinect players control one or two Jedi Padawans.

Sadly, at its most abstract, Jedi Destiny is not a joke. In some alternate universe made of better decisions and technology, it would have been cool. In the abstract, you'd control the Jedi by swinging one arm as if it held a lightsaber while stretching your other arm out to levitate a boulder and then swipe it toward a hopeless enemy Droid. This would be awesome.


In concrete terms, your adventures in Jedi Destiny's Dark Force Rising storyline seldom play out as you would want them to. You're watching your Jedi run from one fight to another, giving you the chance to jump over some obstacles, sidestep some barriers and fight the same few enemies again and again. And it controls so badly. You may control your Jedi trainee's lightsaber hand, but your gesture for success here is, more often than not, the kind of hand waving you'd use to defeat a mosquito or to badly lead an orchestra. Gripping a TV remote or a Wii controller in hand makes this feel a little better, otherwise you'll feel as much like a lightsaber-wielding Jedi as a baseball player who strikes out feels like they've just hit a homerun. The problem is that the Kinect seems barely capable of recognizing arm movements as movements of a saber-wielding arm—and appears to have no clue at all that you've just turned your wrist to tilt your saber down or point it out.

What a cruel game this is. It shows you scenes of Jedis who slice robots with lightsabers while pirouetting through the air, tangling with two at a time while standing on their shoulders and stabbing through the droids with the force and grace that the crude Kinect controls prevent you from replicating. All you can do is the lightsaber equivalent of striking a match. No wonder they deem you a trainee.


The only hope for adventure mode would be the player's other hand—the hand that wields The Force—because this hand needs only move in the slow motions that the Kinect can track so well (see: using Kinect to select Netflix movies to watch).

This hand is let down by this game as well, because the people who made Kinect Star Wars have no idea how to compensate for the Kinect's lack of buttons. The Kinect is popular because it makes using an Xbox feel more magical, intimate and simple. Forget pressing buttons on the controller, Microsoft says. Just wave your hand at the thing. Talk to it. You'll be good to go. (Except if you're trying to be a Jedi!)


You'll feel as much like a lightsaber-wielding Jedi as a baseball player who strikes out feels like they've just hit a homerun.

The Kinect Star Wars player will raise their non-saber hand (my right, though it could be your left) and they will extend their arm, getting into the spirit of things by pretending to focus. And they will ideally see a blue glow in the distance that means they have grabbed a distant boulder with the Force, but, no, they've grabbed the Force-proof soldier next to it. If this game was played by a controller there would be a button you could press to cancel your Force-grip or a button to transfer the Force grip from soldier to boulder (maybe a button for each of those!), but with the Kinect, what are you going to do? You've got one hand doing its Force-grab thing. You've got one hand wielding an imaginary lightsaber. You have to keep your feet free to kick or move forward. The only option appears to have been to either assign some hey-Xbox-please-move-my-Force-grab-to-focus-on-something-else input to a wiggle of your hips. Or make it voice-activated ("Force Switch!"). The developers did not do these things. Hey, that's actually a positive. Maybe?


If anyone who helped make this game has reached this point of the review, they may have just bellowed: THIS GAME IS NOT FOR YOU.

I have no son or daughter, but perhaps this game is for the little ones. I can imagine my nephew waving his arms gleefully as he chops his saber hand through droid after droid. I can imagine him jumping up and down to flip over bad guys and strike them from behind. I can imagine him not minding that the only way to walk from enemy to enemy in adventure mode is to step one foot forward and then lunge, because apparently the universal gesture for daring someone to punch you on the chin is the ideal trigger for telling the Jedi Order's next Obi-Wan Kenobi to go from one side of a room to the other.

My nephew might be amused by all of this. I was amused by bad games when I was a child, too. I was amused by games that didn't respond to my inputs, that wasted my time by repeatedly throwing the same enemies at me, enemies who required the same boring patterns of movement to defeat in a level structure that was plain and devoid of the ability to surprise as most good video games—interactive jungle gyms that they are—do. When I got older, I learned to separate the bad Nintendo Entertainment System games from Super Mario Bros. This game ain't Super Mario Bros., and if my nephew likes it, I'll bet he does because all it needs to be to make him smile is a single five-minute program that lets him wave his hand in front of his television to make a virtual Jedi move his lightsaber. The rest of the adventure is justification for charging $50 for this thing.


At its best moments, Kinect Star Wars starts to work and you can feel the promise of a game that lets you swat one fool enemy with one hand while hoisting the other with your Force hand and then hurling him into a wall. This works rarely, though. Even when it does, it happens during what feels like fan fiction.

Oh, there's no great Star Wars adventure here to distract you from bad controls. No, there is a pastiche of references mostly to the original trilogy by a team of game creators who really should have just been put on a Kinect version of those films' best scenes (look, maybe it wouldn't have been nephew-appropriate, but some of us would have written positive reviews if all Kinect Star Wars was was the interactive version of the New Hope Darth Vader conference table force-choke scene followed by the Empire Strikes Back's Luke-needs-to-grab-his-lightsaber-before-that-snow-monster-gets-him scene, etc. etc. How sad is it that Microsoft themselves made a commercial that depicts this exact fantasy instead of what's actually in the game?)


Here is an adventure mode that, in four hours, squeezes in homages to the original movie's Death Star escape, the Phantom Menace's final space battle, drops some "Red 5 standing by" fan-service lines, milks Yoda's reverse-talking gimmick dry, does its own version of Return of the Jedi's Sarlaac Pit scene, works in some Darth Maul twin bad guys, goes to the speeder bike well multiple times and ends—you won't mind if I tell you—with its version of A New Hope's medal ceremony. They even have Chewbacca grunt at the end. Maybe this is all a sign of rebellion from creators who wanted to make their Star Wars game something other than what it was.

The Jedi Destiny mode is, like the aforementioned official website for milk, something to avoid. The dancing mode, however, is a goofy joy, though it feels tossed-off. It allows you to only queue up one pop-remix at a time while matching your living room dance moves to those done by the Star Wars cast in Jabba's palace, in Cloud City or elsewhere. The dance mode is essentially a simplified Dance Central and would be a pleasant addition to that game.


Kinect Star Wars also includes a gesture-controlled pod-racing mode, a throwback to the hovercraft racing in The Phantom Menace. It controls so loosely that you'll wish you had a control stick in your hand like, you know, real pod-racers have.

There's a dueling mode, pitting one or two players against one or two enemies, from lowly Imperials to Darth Vader. You'll do some strategic blocking (hold your hand up, down, left or right), then whack away at the bad guy. If you're good you'll parry some and unlock better battles the faster you go. It's… decent.


This game plays badly, except when it's just asking you to dance. In other words, it's only good when it is asking you to laugh with it,

Bonus: you get to be a Rancor. Yes, you get a mode that lets you be the beast the lived below Jabba the Hutt's palace. You are set loose on various towns in the Star Wars galaxy and empowered with the ability to pick up people and eat them, pick up droids and toss them, jump up and smash the ground and even rampage through town knocking down buildings. It's fun once. Then you discover that it's essential to get this Rancor to walk forward and that one of the only inputs you've got to do that mandates that you crouch and then paddle you hands as if trying to not drown.


It's cliche to roll one's eyes at new Star Wars products and to see them as that: as the droppings of an assembly line. There actually was a wonderful idea here. Anyone who has ever liked Star Wars would have been delighted with a game that let us feel like we were actually using The Force, that let us air-Jedi our way through a battalion of Separatist droids or bounty hunters.

What we get here seldom works well and is barely a pleasure. This game plays badly, except when it's just asking you to dance. In other words, it's only good when it is asking you to laugh with it. Otherwise, it's just a bad joke and a very bad video game.


I leave you with this. On the left, the signature spaceship your heroes fly in Kinect Star Wars. On the right, the Outrider, signature spaceship of Shadows of the Empire, a miserable Nintendo 64 Star Wars that is suddenly less lonely in the category of bad Star Wars side-stories we could have lived happily without.

Image for article titled Kinect Star Wars: The Kotaku Review


We Dance With Slave Leia To Weird, Lucas-Approved Christina Aguilera Star Wars Remix

We've had a copy of Star Wars: Kinect in our New York office for a few days now. Which means, aside from Stephen's upcoming review, people have been dancing their asses off to pop songs.
Pop songs that have been re-worked to include lyrics from the Star Wars universe. More »




I don't normally do this but my feelings about this whole issue can't be expressed any more plainly in this post I made some days ago.

copypaste initializing.............

It saddens me to see how down people are on this whole Kinect thing, or even motion controls in general. I'm going to stick with Kinect for the sake of my comment stability for now though, as it is the most visibly hated amongst "gamers" on the internet.

Too often I see the ad nauseum spew of the many ways Kinect fails in internet discussion. I dunno, maybe I am a glutton for punishment and I should just not bother looking at the comments on such articles. At the same time without wading through all the negativity I wouldn't be able to experience the heightened sense of awesome that I feel when I read comments by people who "get it".

Get what? Get that no matter how much you personally have distaste for Kinect or like devices, they have their place in gaming.

When I was five, sometime shortly after my brother was born, my mom bought me an Atari 2600. It was apparently the hot new thing for kids, and with my new brother in the picture, all eyes weren't on me all the time. My mom realized that if she was going to be able to properly take care of a baby, my attention would sometimes have to be elsewhere, instead of in her face wanting the attention that should be going to the motor function limited, defenseless newborn.

I was easy enough to distract, I was really into creative things as a child. Legos, Construx, Play-Doh, good old fashioned crayons and drawing paper. I even used to create huge bases and playsets for my G.I. Joes out of the styrofoam packaging that all manner of purchased goods used to come in. God, I miss that. Moving doors and elevators, fully colored and detailed with markers and pens, all that good stuff. If you had asked me, I was just fine without the Ata-whatsit. But I'm rambling, let me get back on track.

Anyways, the day she brought it home for me I couldn't help but be excited. What kid doesn't like getting new stuff? We opened it up together, and out of it we pulled a box with a slot in the middle, and two smaller boxes, each with a rubbery stick and bright orange button protruding from them. My mother had also purchased a few games. Pac-Man, which I remembered from a visit to Chuck-E-Cheese's, Frogger, Combat, Pong and what became my favorite of the bunch, Frogs and Flies.

As time passed, I noticed my mom's waning interest in the console. At first, she was attentively making sure that this thing wasn't a mistake to bring into the house. But a couple years later, my grades were great, I grew ever more creative and imaginitive, and I seemed to like to read on my own, which was always a plus. Video games were not destroying her little boy. So after she deemed it safe, all I ever had to do was ask, and that hot new game I wanted was mine. She never needed to supervise my gaming habits again. Many years later she told me flat out. That Atari was the STUPIDEST THING SHE HAD EVER SEEN. I mean really, what possible fun was there to be had in pushing a stick back and forth and pressing a single button to make dots jump around on your T.V.?

But I enjoyed it, and if I liked it, she loved it. She would later on also purchase for me my next console, a Sega Master System, and for my brother now coming of gaming age, a Nintendo Entertainment system. She would likewise do so with the Sega Genesis and SNES some years later.

During the Genesis age, I became old enough to start working for my own and purchasing the games and consoles for myself. I have had nearly every game system since then, even the Virtual Boy(which I still play on occasion, don't judge me). I became a pretty avid gamer, and remain so to this day.

Without the stupid dot manipulating box, I would never have come to love what is now one of my most important hobbies.

This is Kinect's place in gaming. It's that stupid, nonsensical simple device that you can't understand why it is popular, because you are too mature for such an imperfect piece of tech. To borrow from my mom, "What possible fun is there to be had in flailing yourself around like an idiot in front of your T.V."? Well, for many of you, none. None whatsoever. And that is ok, because maybe Kinect isn't really for you. Maybe it's for the five year old elder sons and daughters of the world. In a world filled with your CoD's, Assassin's Creeds, or any number of games/devices that are inappropriate for young children in one way or another, something has to be for them. Even if that is not fully the intent of MS. Because we need a safe way to make kids into new gamers, possibly gaming adults, and hopefully game developers for the sake of the future of our beloved hobby.

So you hate Kinect? Great, you do that. I'll be cheering it on, hoping that it matures into something that not only is great at entertaining kids, but mature gamers other than myself(frankly, I have tons of fun with mine).

After all, that stupid 2600 eventually evolved into something that even my mom can see the entertainment value in. I am sure Kinect, and motion controls in general, can do the same for all of you.

end copypaste.

is this game bad for us? yes. does it still have an audience and a purpose that will likely benefit us all in the long run? I think so. you are welcome to disagree.