25 Years Later, Player Confirms Street Fighter Alpha 2 Really Does Favor The Underdog

I’m very impressed by Rolento’s leg extension here. What power, what grace.
I’m very impressed by Rolento’s leg extension here. What power, what grace.
Screenshot: Capcom / Kotaku

Modern fighting games are often decried for what’s called “comeback mechanics,” which are thought to be absent from the more “honest” classic fighters. But those complaints ignore that the genre has always been (and I say this with all the love and respect in my heart) full of bullshit. Case in point: 1996’s Street Fighter Alpha 2, one of the best fighting games of all time, gives players who are behind in the round count a small damage boost.

Fighting game community veteran Scott “SaBrE” Bender confirmed as much earlier this week. In the days before training modes and leisurely experimentation, strong players simply intuited that Street Fighter Alpha 2 granted a damage boost to players who are behind in rounds. But things like that were much harder to test when the game was only available in arcades.

“[I] decided to see if an old Street Fighter Alpha 2 theory was true,” Bender said on Twitter earlier this week. [Street Fighter champion Alex Valle] claimed that the loser of round one gets a damage buff in round two. [I] can confirm, the loser gets a one-point damage buff per hit.”

Advertisement

That might not sound like a whole lot, but Bender goes on to explain that this buff greatly benefits characters that can rack up combos using attacks with multiple hits. The comparison he provides of the damage done by Rolento’s Patriot Circle in round one, versus round two after a round one loss, for example, is particularly striking. The attack’s 11 hits amount to 11 more points of damage, which can be significant under the right circumstances.

“I knew about the damage boost early into [Street Fighter Alpha 2],” Valle responded. “I didn’t know the specifics of percentages, but it was easy to see the damage disparity when you’re playing shoto mirrors in round two. Good stuff on breaking down the specifics!” (“Shotos” here refers to fireball- and dragon punch-using characters like Ryu, Ken, and Akuma.)

Sure, Street Fighter Alpha 2’s hidden damage buff isn’t quite as significant as Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3’s X-Factor, which greatly boosts a character’s damage and speed while also regenerating health, but Bender’s confirmation of its existence is important. It serves as a good reminder that fighting games have always had quirks that make them less about providing a completely equitable space for competition and more about learning how to adapt to any given situation.

Advertisement

And let’s be honest: It just feels really good to beat someone in a fighting game, no matter the circumstances. So bring on the comeback mechanics!

Staff Writer, Kotaku

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`

DISCUSSION

feather-throttle-not-hair
feather-throttle-not-hair

Case in point: 1996’s Street Fighter Alpha 2, one of the best fighting games of all time

Huh, i kinda remember the Alpha series getting sort of mediocre reviews at the time. Certainly not as mediocre as the later SFIII series, but I kinda remember ‘purists’ still insisting that SFII Super Turbo was the superior game despite being much older.

That said, i loved Alpha 2 and played the holy hell out of it on my PS1. I’m also willing to accept the possibility that my memory is fuzzy and that Ian is indeed correct here.

Anyone else remember when these games came out?