I played 60 hours of The Witcher 3 earlier this year, and only stopped because I had other games to play. One question always nagged me, though: how did CD Projekt RED put together a sprawling open world game that avoided the genreâs usual preference for meaningless side quests? I called them to find out.
The first article I wrote for Kotaku was bellyaching over the mindless fluff in Dragon Age: Inquisition. The gameâs sweeping landscapes were lovely to walk around, but too often, what you did in them was boring as hell. I felt the exact opposite with The Witcher 3; the vast majority of the gameâs side content filled in satisfying pieces of lore or told their own tiny but interesting stories.
âWe didnât want the player to think that we donât respect his or her time,â said senior writer Kuba SzamaĹek. âWe didnât want quests to feel meaningless or they were a chore to do. We didnât want people to think âoh, god, I have to do this side quest.ââ
There are, quite literally, hundreds of quests available in The Witcher 3. As you gather more and more while exploring the countryside, it can become daunting to figure out where to even begin. But what constantly surprised me about The Witcher 3 is how often I wanted to keep exploring the side quests, rather than plow through the main story and move onto the next game.
Though I picked on Dragon Age: Inquisition earlier, itâs hardly the only offender. Open world games are notorious for stuffing their big worlds with boring side content. Itâs almost seemed inherent to making an open world game.
CD Projekt RED tried to avoid this by flipping their design process around.
âFor the most part, the quest content dictated the size of the world, not the other way around,â said level designer Miles Tost. âWe didnât just start with a huge world and go âwell, letâs see how we can fill this one up.â This probably helped us to not end up with a world that feels artificially bloated just for the sake of size.â
âThe quest team would look at it [the world] and think how many quests we should prepare to provide enough entertaining content to fill these levels,â said SzamaĹek. âSometimes, weâd have to adjust a certain part of the world that felt too big or too small and react accordingly.â
Some games, like The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, have experimented with systems that craft infinite quests for the player, even when the story is over. For a while, CD Projekt RED played around with their take on this for the gameâs monster contracts, in which Geralt travels to various towns to fight unique creatures.
âThe outcome was very unsatisfying,â he said. âWe saw that difference and the contrast [between] what we did by hand and what we tried to generate. It was so big that we simply could not do it.â
It didnât work very well in Skyrim, either.
Instead, they went back to the drawing board, and came up with a way to write and develop monster contracts on their own without overwhelming the team.
Nothing in the game is procedurally generated, in fact.
âEverything that is made in a level was hand-crafted.,â said Tost. âSome person has worked on placing that tree or that rock or that house. Thereâs nothing that we just press a button for and, suddenly, itâs there. That allowed us to add a lot of great detail and also love to some places. Some people would take parentship of some locations and build and go so far as to add some easter eggs. I certainly have some locations that have things that only friends of mine would understand. âOh, this is something that Miles did!ââ
The process for pitching open world quests was a give-and-take between writers, designers, artists, and everyone else involved in making the game. In most cases, the stories littering the open world were first conceived by trying to reuse assets already made for the game, rather than coming up with new stuff.
The rule, said SzamaĹek, was to not write more than 15 lines of dialogue.
âWeâd go over the limit not once or twice but three times,â he laughed. âThen, we had to fight to convince people that itâs the extra effort and extra money to add all these lines because it adds so much to the quality of the quest.â
The earlier in development, the easier it was to argue for making something more ambitious. One of the gameâs most memorable side quests, in which players investigate a wizard studying cheeses, wasnât meant to be more than a small room. The concept was thrown around as the studio was winding down on a Friday night, but the team got behind the quirky idea, so it kept growing.
âOne of the things I really like about CD Projekt is that we have a flat hierarchy,â said SzamaĹek, âand people of all sorts of backgrounds in a company can come up with crazy ideas. If they gain traction, they go in the game.â
As a game moves closer and closer to completion, however, things get hairy. The gameâs writing, for example, had to be finished roughly six months before the game ships, since thereâs so much production involved with recording the dialogue, implementing it into the game, and making sure it all syncs nicely.
âAt the stage,â said SzamaĹek, ânot all the systems are implemented, the code is not necessarily super stable, and so on. We have to finish working on the gameâs plot before the game is actually working smoothly. By the time it is and everyone can test it, itâs too late to make any major changes. You have to think about what the game is going to look like at the end. Thereâs a lot of guesswork.â
This was especially true for the side quests. In one quest, it changed enough that the dialogue no longer made any sense. It was too late to record anything new, however, so a last-ditch effort was made to copy, paste, and stitch pieces of dialogue from four other quests in the game and hope that nobody would notice.
âAs far as I know, nobody even realized that,â said SzamaĹek.
(Kotaku readers, can we solve the mystery?)
The level designers have things a little easier, with deadlines closer to the gameâs release date. But that doesnât mean there arenât hiccups along the way. As the team prepared an E3 demo a few years back, it became clear the way Geralt climbed around the world didnât work. They wanted to encourage players to go wherever they want, but to make the E3 demo function, the developers had to modify every single object in the world and flag it as something Geralt could or couldnât climb. The team wouldnât have time to do this for the entire game.
Instead, they came up with a new system that let him climb anywhere, but this required completely rethinking the gameâs level design.
âSome quests are actually dependent on being played in a certain order,â said Tost. âYou are not supposed to leave a certain section or else the quest will break. Suddenly, all these quests were essentially broken, since Geralt, instead of being able to climb a very limited amount of objects, could climb all the objects in the game. [laughs] […] Our own ambition caused this small hazard in development where everyone went âoh, god, we need to change everything so drastically.â [laughs] But, ultimately, it turned out for the better.â
CD Projekt RED discovered one unfortunate side effect while playtesters were working through an early version of the game. In this sequence, Ciri is recovering in a sauna from an injury sheâs sustained in battle.
âCiri is wearing her underwear and bandage and thatâs it,â said SzamaĹek. âThey managed to jump across the fence and they started roaming Skellige as a half-naked Ciri. This is a big sign that there was further work to be done. [laughs] This happens sometimes.â
The massive critical and commercial acclaim for The Witcher 3, however, seems to suggest the studioâs attention to detail has paid off. This obsession covered every aspect of the game, including what material made up the walls of Novigard, one of the main cities. The team spent a whole meeting researching what would be appropriate for their world; to them, having a world full of monsters didnât give CD Projekt RED a license to throw all logic out the window.
âItâs not something players notice on a conscious level,â said SzamaĹek, âunless theyâre PhD students in medieval architecture. [laughs] I think it all comes together to create this illusion of a real place you can immerse yourself in.â
Mission accomplished, Iâd say.
âWe wanted to make everything by hand and make sure everything is unique,â said Tost, âto keep up the playerâs sense of excitement while exploring the world and a sense of wonder. Even if you see something familiar on the horizon, it should still be worth exploring. You should be able to find something interesting.â