Black Friday Is Almost Here!
The Inventory team is rounding up deals you don’t want to miss, now through Cyber Monday. Click here to browse!

What’s So BioWare About the Next Command & Conquer?

Illustration for article titled What’s So BioWare About the Next emCommand  Conquer/em?

During my recent interview with BioWare co-founders Ray Muzyka and Greg Zeschuk, we talked about the obvious things like Mass Effect and Star Wars: The Old Republic.

Advertisement

We also discussed Command & Conquer.

Why were we discussing Command & Conquer? More specifically, as I asked both men, why should we think of the upcoming Command & Conquer Generals 2 as a BioWare game? After all, wasn't Generals 2 in development at the former EA LA studio, which was known briefly as Victory Games? And wasn't that studio simply re-branded as BioWare Victory? Is there really anything BioWare about this game other than the name?

Advertisement

Should I be so cynical?

"I hope not," Muzyka said to me.

"We want to bring BioWare quality," he said. "We want to bring a compelling story to a real-time strategy kind of experience."

We're talking about a real-time strategy game that's part of a series that, if it was ever known for story, was known for cheesy live-action sequences starring hammy actors and, once pro wrestler Ric Flair being attacked by a bear. (To be fair, that was from the goofier Red Alert sub-brand of C&C games.)

Muzyka nevertheless sees a "really interesting opportunity to add more story into that space. We see that as an opportunity to kind of innovate and give people more." Vague enough, sure, but Muzyka does have the presence of mind to temper expectations, saying that story would be added "in a way that's appropriate for the genre. We want to make it more compelling, immersive experience for real-time strategy fans."

Advertisement

He and Zeschuk are both senior executives at BioWare these days. Neither is making games day to day, but their visions influence their teams. They sound as if they do respect the RTS genre for what it has been. Says Zeschuk, "Ironically, the original C&C is the first game we played in the basement when we were supposed to be working on BioWare." And Muzyka remarks that, "if you think about the combat mechanic in [early BioWare game] Baldur's Gate, that was heavily influenced by RTS mechanics."

BioWare games have always been about story and choice. It remains hard to see how those values would apply to or evolve a Command & Conquer, nor is it yet convincing that the BioWare Victory effort really is anything more than the application of a successful studio brand name on an existing crew of creators.

Advertisement

We'll hopefully see more of Generals 2 in the months to come. And with that, we'll get a sense of how BioWare the game is—and whether that's something Command & Conquer needed or not.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

""We want to bring BioWare quality," he said. "We want to bring a compelling story to a real-time strategy kind of experience.""

lol

Oh, right, um, substantive post.

So, Bioware, listen, maybe you should work on bringing compelling stories to your own games before working on someone else's IP. Mass Effect and Dragon Age could sure use some of that mythic Bioware quality storytelling about now.

Also, how do you plan on turning Command & Conquer into some sort of fucksim? Do you just have the live actors replaced with pornographic ones? Your stories are at the porno level anyways...

Obligatory: [rampantgames.com]