Overwatch Probably Won't Get A Hero Wackier Than Wrecking Ball

Illustration for article titled iOverwatch /iProbably Wont Get A Hero Wackier Than Wrecking Ballem/emem/em

There was a time, hard as it might be to remember, when Overwatch’s wackiest hero was a peanut-butter-loving science ape from the moon. Earlier this year, however, he was usurped by a mech-piloting, robo-voiced, Thunderdome-battling hamster who’s also from the moon. How do you top that? Overwatch director Jeff Kaplan isn’t sure he wants to.

“Do we have ideas that are wackier than Hammond?” Kaplan said to Kotaku at BlizzCon, referring to the ball-riding hamster whose official name in Overwatch is Wrecking Ball. “Yes. Will they ever make it into the game? I don’t think so.”

He likened the creation of Hammond to “moments where all creative people try to push up against their boundaries,” just to figure out what they really are. This led to friction on the development team, he said. Sparks flew internally as people batted around the idea of a mega-genius space hamster in a world of heroes, villains, and Halloween-costume-wearing goth edgelord dads.


“Hammond was very controversial on the team,” said Kaplan. “Like, actual heated debates where we had to calm people down, where we were like, ‘We’re not gonna ruin Overwatch by introducing this character.’ Some people literally felt like we might be. We took that very seriously.”

The end result was a fun, if sometimes frustrating-to-play-against hero who’s been largely accepted by Overwatch’s playerbase. That does not, however, mean that Kaplan and company are itching to have another go at pushing Overwatch’s fiction to its limits.

“There’s almost no controversy in the community now,” said Kaplan. “Like Winston, I think we’ve made him feel very natural in the Overwatch universe. But I think it was a cautionary tale to us of, ‘Be careful when you push against your creative boundaries a little bit too hard.’ Or at least, we’re on cooldown.”


That said, Kaplan isn’t entirely closing the door on the idea of a hero so wacky it makes even Hammond look tame. Just mostly.

“I think when it comes to the creativity of the Overwatch team, pushing up against Hammond and Winston is maybe as far as we go,” he said. “Maybe? For now at least?”

Kotaku senior reporter. Beats: Twitch, streaming, PC gaming. Writing a book about streamers tentatively titled "STREAMERS" to be published by Atria/Simon & Schuster in the future.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Foxstar loves Bashcraft

I dunno, I think Blizzard is at their best when they aren’t trying to be serious. Look at Diablo, where you have a chosen hero who can kick the shit out of angels, demons, their cross-breed children and depending on the hero, do multi-millions in damage in one swing, so much so that Hell’s biggest badasses are effectively helpless against him or her and who’s potential is so unlimited that even someone using the power of Death against them can only at most slow them down before exploding into showers of loot.

What could harm or ruin Overwatch is lack of care in who gets nerfs and buffs and getting -too- serious about respecting the meta. I think those are bigger dangers then getting all worried that a hamster in a mecha ball with guns is going to somehow make Overwatch less srs buzzns.