Justice of the Supreme Court Antonin Scalia defends the Supreme Court's decision to keep violent video games in the hands of California gamers based on the First Amendment.
Advertisement
Share This Story
Get our newsletter
DISCUSSION
JadeEyePanda
That quote byte is terrible.
There's plenty of ways this applies otherwise.
Polygamy?
We're disgusted with those, and we have outlawed it.
Application of this mindsets lead, I feel, to a child-like supposition that "Because I can, means I should" There is no 'ought' in '"I can' power.'
But the ruling's fair.
If California won, that'd be fine too. I doubt that my children, or anyone's else children, would die from such a decision to prevent 12 year olds from playing Halo.
DISCUSSION
That quote byte is terrible.
There's plenty of ways this applies otherwise.
Polygamy?
We're disgusted with those, and we have outlawed it.
Application of this mindsets lead, I feel, to a child-like supposition that "Because I can, means I should" There is no 'ought' in '"I can' power.'
But the ruling's fair.
If California won, that'd be fine too. I doubt that my children, or anyone's else children, would die from such a decision to prevent 12 year olds from playing Halo.