In some fictional world probably created by AI, John Connor is rolling over in his grave. On the the Boz to the Future podcast, Terminator director and former staunch AI detractor James Cameron not only explains his new support of AI but says it could be an essential tool if filmmakers want to keep making visually daring films like the Dune movies in the future.
On the podcast, the three-time Oscar winner explains he changed his stance on AI being part of the filmmaking process for the same reason that can make almost anyone change their opinion on anything: money. No, he wasnāt paid to change his opinion (as far as we know), but he harped on the financial burden incurred when crafting elaborate VFX-heavy films like his Avatar series and Denis Villeneuveās Dune movies. According to him, if we want to keep making such films, production costs have to come down, and AI might be the way to do that.
āIf we want to continue to see the kinds of movies that Iāve always loved and that I like to make and that I will go to seeāDune, Dune: Part Two, or one of my films or big effects-heavy, CG-heavy filmsāweāve got to figure out how to cut the cost of that in half.ā
He made sure to clarify that in his view, AI shouldnāt replace humansā jobs, but accelerate them. AI should be ādoubling their speed to completion on a given shot, so your cadence is faster and your throughput cycle is faster, and artists get to move on and do other cool things and then other cool things.ā It appears he views AI in movies as akin to the computer replacing the typewriter, rather than sentient killing machines replacing the human species.
As practical as that may be, it still sounds like it came from bizzarro world when you remember that Cameron gave an ominous warning about AI back in 2023 when he told CTV News, āI warned you guys in 1984, and you didnāt listen.ā Finding AI so horrifying that he references his 1984 film TheĀ Terminator, whose plot is set in motion by an AI that seeks to wipe out humanity, when warning about its dangers doesnāt sound like a stance one can just pivot from in less than two years.
Still, heās spent time since then studying the workings of AI, which may have contributed to the shift in his views. On the Boz to the Future podcast he discussed taking time to learn the nuances of the AI space in order to find a way to leverage its redeemable aspects to push filmmaking further. āThe goal was to understand the space, to understand whatās on the minds of the developers,ā he explained. āWhat are they targeting? Whatās their development cycle? How much resources you have to throw at it to create a new model that does a purpose-built thing, and my goal was to try to integrate it into a VFX workflow.ā
To his credit, he never said AI should be writing movies, having said in 2023, ā āI just donāt personally believe that a disembodied mind thatās just regurgitating what other embodied minds have saidāabout the life that theyāve had, about love, about lying, about fear, about mortalityāand just put it all together into a word salad and then regurgitate it…I donāt believe that have something thatās going to move an audience.ā So heās not fully on the AI bandwagon. But he did join the Stability AI Board of Directors last September to help bring AI capabilities to future filmmakers. With Cameron on board, it could only be a matter of time before Hollywood begins finding ways to incorporate AI without killing us all.