The tenth annual installation of Awesome Games Done Quick wrapped up yesterday, raising over $3 million for charity and bringing in hundreds of thousands of viewers. But as the event gets bigger, so do its controversies. This year, organization GDQās decision to accept a runner who espoused right-wing viewpoints on social mediaāand then to ban him immediately after his runāhas stirred emotions and fiercely divided the community.
The situation came to a head on Tuesday night. Just hours before speedrunners Tojju, Muttski, and Luzbelheim (āLuzā) were scheduled to start a monstrous 9-hour Final Fantasy VIII relay, a screenshot of Luzās Twitter profile started going viral. It highlighted his bio, which said āI hate feminazism,ā claimed that he identified as ādeminonbinary,ā and stated that he preferred the pronouns āluz/luz.ā Speedrunner StebMcDreb, who posted the screenshot, also dug up a tweet in which Luz had endorsed the economic policy of the Spanish ultranationalist party Vox.
āAs a disabled queer person, seeing someone with those kinds of beliefs go unchallenged by the community would make me feel discouraged from participating in it,ā StebMcDreb told Kotaku this weekend. āIād be less likely to attend events knowing Iād be sharing a space with people who think my identity is all one big joke.ā
That challenge came even more swiftly, and with greater force, than she could have expected. The Twitter spat led to negative media coverage about AGDQ, and the eventās organizers seemed to pick up on the message. Immediately after Luzās Final Fantasy VIII run was over, he says that GDQ founder Mike Uyama pulled him aside and said, āwe have to talk.ā
In an interview with Kotaku, Luz said that Uyama said heād be suspended from participating in the event. āHe told me, ābased on the new policies of GDQ, you are banned from submissions, [but] not from attending,āā Luz said. āI asked him why, and he told me, āI canāt talk about it. New policies, we canāt talk about that. If you want more information, you have to send us an email after the event.āā
Luz said he continued to press Uyama until the GDQ founder finally acknowledged that the ban was because of Luzās Twitter, but that Uyama wouldnāt get into more specifics. Luz said Uyama did not specify the banās length, but according to GDQās website, 18 months is typical. When asked about this by Kotaku, Uyama confirmed that the organization spoke to Luz about concerns regarding his social media, but during our interview, a GDQ PR spokesperson prevented Uyama from commenting further.
Within the broader speedrunning community, reactions to Luzās social media activity, as well as to GDQās decision to issue a ban, were sharply divided.
Streamer and former Final Fantasy IV speedrunner Brossentia knows Luz from the speedrunning marathon RPG Limit Break, and has emerged as one of his most prominent critics. āIf you look at the bio,ā he told Kotaku over the phone this weekend, āit clearly is making fun of feminists, it clearly is making fun of trans people, and people have pointed it out to him multiple times.ā
Brossentia suggested that Luz, a non-native-English speaker from Spain, may not have appreciated the full nuance of what he wrote, but emphasized that heād been given ample opportunities to change or apologize. āThatās my problem with the situation,ā said Brossentia. āNot that he had it to begin with, but that he refuses to see how it feeds into discrimination.ā
Meanwhile, those close to Luz have largely either gone silent or defended him. āHeās spent a lot of time with trans people and gay people and nonbinary people,ā said Kyoslilmonster, a streamer who met Luz through the Final Fantasy speedrunning scene. āIāve never seen him be aggressive towards anyone. I donāt think Luz is some radical fascist thatās out to hurt anybody.ā
For his part, Luz told Kotaku that he is sympathetic to the idea that GDQ likely felt pressured by negative publicity to take action against him, but wishes the organizers had been more direct about what was going on. āI would like to talk to the people that decided to ban me,ā he said. āI would like an explanation, or at least I would like to see honesty in their side.ā
When asked to elaborate on his views, Luz said he believes he has been mischaracterized, telling Kotaku that he really does consider himself ādeminonbinary,ā and that he only partially supports Vox. Luz further said that, although he uses male pronouns, he would prefer that people who are unsure of his pronouns use a shortened version of his nickname as a gender-neutral alternative, hence the āluz/luzā in his bio.
One friend of Luz, a speedrunner who goes by the name Bread, speculated that the line āI hate feminazisā in Luzās bio refers to trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs). āHe does not hate feminists as a whole, just TERFs,ā Bread said. āHe can certainly do a better job of communicating that.ā
Regardless, to people who followed or knew Luzbelheim, his stances were old news. Those interviewed pointed out that observers had already publicly brought up Luzās Twitter bio when the schedule was announced in Octoberāand that GDQ did not take action at the time.
When asked by Kotaku, GDQ representatives declined to comment on whether they had learned about Luzās Twitter bio before the convention. Kasumi Yogi, GDQās director of marketing and business development, said the eventās organizers look at speedrunnersā social media presences before accepting their submissions, but that some things are occasionally overlooked. āWe execute as much fairness as possible, given that we are human,ā she said. āIf we find things that are in violation our rules, we try to be very consistent, and that is regardless of how high-profile it is.ā
Another spokesperson, who asked not to be named, said that the organization tries to be responsive when situations come up that are not addressed in the existing rules. āEvery GDQ is different, so sometimes there might be situations that we may have never encountered before, and thatās where we have to adapt and figure out, you know, is this a problem for future events?ā
GDQ representatives declined to comment on the details of Luzās ban or to specify which rule he had broken, citing concerns for his privacy. Instead they directed Kotaku to GDQās event rules page, where a section on āunacceptable behavior while off-streamā was recently added.
This isnāt the first time that GDQās hazy punishment policies have caused controversy. In 2018, speedrunner BubblesDelFuego said he was banned for sharing his medical marijuana with a friend. Other controversies occurred in 2017 and 2016. Kyoslilmonster put it well: āFor the love of god, make fucking clear and precise rules. Thereās drama like this every year.ā
Evan Malmgren is a freelance writer and a researcher at Type Media Center. Heās been trying to sell out for years, but canāt seem to find any buyers.