Borderlands 3 Feels Like A Throwback To 2012 In All The Best (And Worst) Ways

It has been five years since the last two Borderlands games—the one-two punch of Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel and the Telltale Games spinoff, Tales From the Borderlands. Five years is a healthy amount of time for something to be gone, but for Gearbox Software, developers of the first two games (The Pre-Sequel was developed by 2K Australia, with assistance from Gearbox), it’s been even longer. The 2012 release of Borderlands 2 might as well have been a lifetime ago.

One of the weirder things about our Extremely Online Times is that you don’t really have to wait that long to be nostalgic for something. If you’re regularly logged on, checking out streams and posts and the like, months can feel like years, and years like entire decades. That might be why Borderlands 3 feels like such a throwback. Or maybe it’s because, in all that time, Gearbox does not appear to have changed the Borderlands formula much. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

At a preview event last week, I spent about five hours with Borderlands 3, playing through the game’s prologue at my own pace (a leisurely 3-4 hours) and then through a section midway through the game with a character at level 22. You can see the footage embedded above. It’s a healthy slice of a near-finished game, one that feels a lot like Borderlands has never really left.


Consistent with the previous games, its shooting is fine, but the main draw is the sheer variety of guns and the effects they can potentially have. The experience of actually shooting them still feels somewhat ephemeral and light in your digital hands, but the guns themselves? Wonderfully varied in ways that makes you want to toy with them all. Pistols that also fire rockets, guns that you throw instead of reloading (and which subsequently become bouncing grenades or walking turrets), or a wicked chain gun with a second barrel you can toggle on or off.

Illustration for article titled Borderlands 3 Feels Like A Throwback To 2012 In All The Best (And Worst) Ways

The game gets with the times, but only a little bit. You can now mantle and slide; the latter feels nicer to do than the former. In a lot of ways, though, Borderlands 3 feels a lot like the exact same kind of game the previous three were. From the hefty five-hour slice I played, the most noticeable difference in Borderlands 3 is in each character’s special abilities, called Action skills.

In previous games, characters had one action skill that, as you leveled up, could be tweaked and improved by passive upgrades and interesting buffs based on the skill tree of your choosing. In Borderlands 3, characters have three action skills you can swap between, and each can be upgraded in unique ways. Moze, for example, summons a mech as her action skill, but what weapons it has equipped are completely up to you. As you upgrade her skill trees, you can choose to add a minigun, a rail gun, or a grenade launcher, and modify or upgrade those as you see fit.


If you pick FL4K, the robot Beastmaster, those skill trees look entirely different: you unlock new pets and special abilities independently, which you can then mix and match. So you can choose from having a Spiderant, Skag, or Jabber pet following you around, and also pick your accompanying skill, be it invisibility, or summoning rakks to dive-bomb a target.

This wildly diverse set of customization options shores up the one thing Borderlands games have been pretty lousy at for a long time: The “role-playing” part of “action role-playing game.” These changes make me feel like it will be much easier to sink many hours into Borderlands 3, especially around the fifteen-hour mark, where previous games left me feeling like my options were pretty thin.

Illustration for article titled Borderlands 3 Feels Like A Throwback To 2012 In All The Best (And Worst) Ways

Yet there are a considerable number of things that might make it much harder to play Borderlands 3. Let’s start with that distinctive tone. The Borderlands house style is brash, irreverent schlock, delivered in a way that will strike some as obnoxious. It’s been ten years since the first Borderlands, and if you played that game, you have probably changed a lot in the last ten years, and yet here is Borderlands 3, behaving like the same old high school cut-up even though it’s middle-aged.


There’s reason to believe that this tone might be in the service of a satisfying story. Borderlands 2 was acclaimed for its surprisingly involved, character-driven plot, and the story of Borderlands 3 appears to have some potential meat on its bones. Its villains are a couple of streamers—twin siblings Troy and Tyreen Calypso—who have united the series’ disparate groups of ludicrously armed bandits and goons under the banner of their fandom.

From what I’ve played, the Calypso Twins—while being loud, confrontational characters in the Borderlands vein—aren’t merely vapid parody. I had the opportunity to ask Borderlands 3 co-lead writers Sam Winkler and Danny Homan about this, and I’ve been thinking about their answer ever since.


“We thought it would be really interesting to deal with villains that built their way up and had this crowd-sourced, grassroots Psycho army. It’s so much fun to see these twins have to be ‘on’ all the time: Simultaneously they’re insulting us and entertaining their viewers and egging them on into increasingly horrifying acts,” Winkler said. “In order to be a streamer, you have to have something special to you, and you have to be always ‘on.’ And there’s a slippery slope aspect of like, ‘Oh no, I gotta do bigger and better things.’”

There are also real-world concerns about some of the people involved in the production of this game, which are less easily assuaged. Most disconcerting and relevant to my time spent with the game is the presence of Chris Hardwick, reprising his voice acting role as Tales From the Borderlands character Vaughn, despite allegations of emotional abuse that came to light last year.


I asked Homan and Winkler about Hardwick, and this is what they said: “I’d be lying if said, if it wasn’t a conversation when it first came up,” WInkler said. “But those decisions end up getting made at a higher level. Working with Vaughn, the character, is extremely fun. We had a really great time writing him.”

It is also impossible to write about Borderlands 3 and not also consider things like the sensational allegations made against Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford on the part of a former Gearbox lawyer, who claims that Pitchford has received a substantial advance against Borderlands 3 profits that would otherwise go towards developer royalties (among more salacious claims). All of these allegations have been categorically denied by Gearbox and legal proceedings have been underway since January, but it’s another complicating factor that has many fans feeling uncertain about Borderlands 3.


It’s been ten years since the first Borderlands game came out. A lot has changed, but it seems like Borderlands the video game series has not. That sounds like great news if you’re a Borderlands fan—but also, maybe Borderlands fans have changed, too. Sometimes nostalgia is just fine. Sometimes it’s nowhere near enough.

Borderlands 3 is out September 13, 2019.

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`


Grandpa Stern

There’s kind of an off tone here. The premise seems to be that maybe people only liked Borderlands because they were immature and young and now they are old and seasoned and won’t? I guess that works if you assume that the player was X age (maybe your age?) when they first started playing but now they have “been to a college and seen so much of this world.” Ten years to me means I was 33 when Borderlands came out. I played it with my 33 year old friends. Not every joke landed, true. Some of it is poo poo pants, pee pee head garbage. There was definitely some gold in there, though, and as the series went on, the garbage kind of sifted to the bottom culminating in some amazing beats in 2 and Tiny Tina’s DLC. So, sure. Some people have undoubtedly “been to the mountain” now that they are, oh, 25 instead of 15 and are too mature for the booboo fell down made ouchie. I guess. Or something.

As for the rest of the, ahem, criticisms, is it just standard Kotaku procedure now that if Borderlands is mentioned the “questionable choice to include Hardwick” thing has to come up? Like is there an editor off to the side with a huge leek raised over their writers’ heads (anything else would be inhumane) and he or she or they is just like, “Type it. TYPE IT!” Whether you believe Hardwick was a BadMan(tm) we’ve really got nothing to work with here. There’s nothing. And I went looking. People either hate him or like him and either believe he was always going to “hurt somebody” or that he would never “hurt somebody.” Did he? I have no idea. The whole “case” is a mess. But to keep bringing it up as if anyone who gives him a crap VA job is funding Guatemalan genocide is just...sad at this point.

And then to double down on the allegations against Pitchford. I was honestly surprised the vaunted “USB drive with underage porn” on it didn’t come up. In all truth, I think Pitchford is a slimy, smarmy little mofo. I’ve hated him since his Aliens: Col Marines responses. But really? “Many fans” are conflicted about Hardwick’s inclusion in the game and Pitchford’s possible funding scheme? I definitely don’t have a crystal ball and if someone showed me a video of Hardwick beating his wife in an elevator or paperwork where Pitchford illegally moved some funds out of his workers’ pensions (doubt they get those in this business) I would be on the “Down with Borderlands 3" hype, for sure. As it stands, though, eh. I suppose the sales will tell.