Brian Crecente's discussions

@Thalandor46: It is a day note, so in theory you could just pass. Who wants to listen to me babble anyway? Read more

@FacebookConnect: I can read it Read more

@BUNGL3: [gawker.com] Read more

@General Gumball: Here's more on that issue: [gawker.com] Read more

@JohnHamptonshire'sLostAccount: We've updated the faq linked in the article above. In a nutshell, the servers are overwhelmed dealing with changes on both ends, so you may need to try more than once. Read more

@Brian_Decente: It's updated in the faq as well. I've also thrown it into comments. Read more

@Marik: 1. No it was really a year end thing with some discussion about the upcoming redesign. Read more

@Borello-Crompton: Thanks for the concern. I'm doing fine, just a little stretched thin. Read more

@Tokidoki(何時も): NinjaMarion has it right. Read more

@PigletLUV: It wasn't. Read more

@Bob_Malooga: Thanks for that, though Im not sure all commenters at Kotaku would agree with you. Read more

@Adarael: Thanks Read more

@DRaGZ: not implying you should, but you can always click on the thumbsdown after responding to de-promote the thread. Read more

@Jezuz: You should be. Very sorry. Read more

@A.RANDOM.CLAYMORE: Here's the thread with Nick and Gawker.com talking about this: Read more

@A.RANDOM.CLAYMORE: Here's the thread with Nick and Gawker.com talking about this: Read more

@Eternal: Yeah, i saw that, but they only thing i can think they're referring to are the press sites. So people can use them to go get the screenshots everyone posts I guess. Read more

@adinnieken: Im assuming it's a fake email someone set up when they registered to Kotaku. Read more

@Tsundere: Gawker owns Kotaku. Read more

@Eternal: Im unclear how anything Kotaku had could be used to access anything on a publisher's site besides there press releases. We simply don't have any secret access to any of them. Read more