@Kotaku Reject: Super Mario Galaxy, Mass Effect 2, not sure, not sure, Tali Read more
@Kotaku Reject: Super Mario Galaxy, Mass Effect 2, not sure, not sure, Tali Read more
@SixTwoSixFour: I'm not that excited or worry about it. It will be of consistently high level quality, like all Bioware games. It will probably follow the same plots, only have a lot more boring greyscape battles. Read more
@Rachel Fogg: I'm actually probably going to ignore the games coming out that year (the only one I was excited for was Dragon Age and now I'm not very excited for it at all) and get a lot of games I missed this year. Read more
@Shami 'Wowie' Sansi: 500-800. Read more
@Nathaniel Lowe: I've had blue poop before, so it's not that original. Read more
@BronzeSoldier: Galaxy 2 offered something new in almost every level. You've about reached the end of the game by the time it's stopped experimenting. That's why it's a great game. Read more
@DrkPheonix: Well I don't think Black Ops should have been up there either. Read more
@ScuseMePrincess: Mass Effect 2 is much, much better than the first one. More shootery, better dialog, less Shepard (thank God). It really came into its own as a game. Read more
@Nerubasasin19: Super Macho Gaiden 2. It's a small game but it has a very dedicated fanbase. Read more
@-MasterDex-: Here are my two points against Starcraft and Minecraft. Read more
So I wrote a long post enthusing about Galaxy 2, but then I decided to rewrite it. It sounds like these games need to push the genre forward to be considered. Starcraft II, for example, has many, many virtues but doesn't seem to push the genre. Here's why I think the list is missing a member: Read more
@UsernameOfTheDead: Bugs? I don't know, never played it. Mass Effect 2 and RDR seemed to get no complaints. Read more
@PossibleCabbage: I heard the PC version was pretty damn broken. Read more
@Paul_Is_Drunk: I don't know if I'd call it a once-in-a-lifetime game. It's a really, really good game, but it still has some glaring flaws. Most Bioware's previous work is on its level. Read more