Kotaku 
Enter your username and password.
Denver, 5:42 AM
Sun Nov 8
16 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip us: tips@kotaku.com
Editor-In-Chief:
Brian Crecente
Email | AIM | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Stephen Totilo
Email | AIM | Twitter
Senior Editor:
Michael McWhertor
Email | AIM | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor, Japan:
Brian Ashcraft
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, East Coast:
Michael Fahey
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Oceania:
Luke Plunkett
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Weekends:
Owen Good
Email | AIM | Twitter
Correspondent, San Francisco:
AJ Glasser
Email | AIM | Twitter
Columnist:
Leigh Alexander
Columnist:
Tim Rogers
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
08/03/09
08/03/09
There was a "Senator Golden-Gate"?
08/02/09
08/02/09
And i like the idea of Video Game Streets...
Covenant Drive anyone?
08/02/09
08/02/09
08/02/09
08/02/09
07/12/09
07/11/09
07/11/09
Although I'm not a fan of the genre usually, an open world Tomb Raider seems like a potentially good idea to me. As long as they find a way to make it obvious what you're supposed to do. One of the things I don't like about TR games (but I'm aware that most everyone else does) is the fact that it's always hard to figure out where the hell you're supposed to go next. This is usually due to level design and things being really obscured against the background or textures or whatever.
Give me a Tomb Raider game that controls like Zelda and has a MUCH better combat system (which you hopefully won't have to use TOO much) and I would imagine I would enjoy it a great deal.
07/11/09
07/11/09
I know that it can be a bit disappointing to fans of the series as it has been, as I certainly have been, but the recent reinvisioning of these older IPs (Fallout et al) have really made the IPs better, as far as a wide audience is concerned.
It's hard for Tomb Raider to compete with Uncharted how it is now anyway, so sticking to this genre to the letter isn't doing them any favors, apart from appealing to a very core audience.
If it doesn't work, there's always another Tomb Raider: Anniversary to look forward to somewhere down the line.
Go for it.
07/11/09
The thing about the old tombraider games that made it fun was, while the character wasn't really well proportioned it did cater to both male/female audiences well.
You had the open exploratory mansion where you could just run about do a lot of stuff and it's own mazes and puzzles. Sort of like a practice zone and the rest of the levels were quite colourful. The first three games were pretty much going on those themes. Then there was the whole we need to explore her backstory quite a bit thing.
When it comes to gamers, after a franchise has been developed, people prefer it to stick to what it is because they are familiar to it and what needs to be done is to challenge it without removing the familar atmosphere of the game. For instance if you made an RPG with Ken Masters all the way to him marrying his wife and just gave him a limited arsenal of moves - it probably wouldn't work because the audience for it is different (for instance MK: Mythologies - Sub Zero never really worked).
Use the same formula but make it interesting. Gaming sometimes is like food, you are not going to add ice cream in your curry unless you're weird like that.
You do have an open world if you let the people explore the mansion and the surroundings but keep the game as a separate area from it. Give elements such as taking pictures at points in your exploration, don't make her look too much like Megan Fox. I'm not entirely sure about co-op because if it fits the story fine but don't force it in which is pretty much like doing what Lucas and Spielberg did to Indy as some of us must have experienced in South Park.
Leave the intrigue for games whose plots need intrigue. If Bond suddenly decided to wear a cape and call himself a 'SuperSpyMan' it prolly wouldn't work either.
I'm all for change really, but when you do change make it something that can resemble the original product unless of course you decide to put it in the freezer for 10 years and then revamp it like in the movies which could work better in games as tech moves faster.
07/11/09
Tomb Raider is a platformer.
You go and attempt to turn it into Resident Evil and those (actually quite good) Underworld sales numbers that you were so retardedly disappointed with are going to look like the latest Halo by comparison.
You have been warned!
07/11/09
07/11/09
Maybe "platformer" is too narrow a definition. "Platform-puzzler" might be closer. Personally, I feel the "adventure" label better fits the old-school dialog-heavy, point-and-click Lucasarts & Sierra games.
We might not be able to agree on what Tomb Raider is, but what it isn't is easier to point at, I think. And it ain't survival horror. They might as well not even call it Tomb Raider if that's where Eidos want to take it.
Granted, this is all very premature. Crystal Dynamics are a great developer and their stewardship of the franchise thus far has been stellar. But this reboot (coming only a coupla games after the last Tomb Raider reboot) just smacks of Eidos interference. I am concerned!
07/12/09
07/12/09
But you're right, Lara does deserve a chance to be a star again. Guess we'll see how this gamble pays off in a year or two. :)
07/11/09
07/11/09
But to see a mock-up like this makes me sad. After all these years they don't seem to know what to do with Lara or the series so they keep firing away, hoping something hits.
I never saw Lara as this super-spy kill'em all woman who was invincible. Just an intelligent, courageous adventurer who wanted to see things no one else had the (ahem) balls to go look for.
I really hope Tomb Raider doesn't turn into a Resident Evil clone. I love RE to death, but I don't need Lara to put on those boots. I need her to remind me why I cared about her in the first place.
07/11/09
07/11/09
07/12/09