<![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay - Kotaku Comments]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay - Kotaku Comments]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @RaepGoblin:

yeah, seriously.

i've played 1 PC FPS and i'm better than most of the people in those demos.

that's a bad, bad thing.

but if i had a PC that could handle this game, i'd buy this game in a heart beat.

but mostly for single player since that looks amazing and not as average as multiplayer.

my online multiplayer heart belongs with Halo 3, where i'm doing pretty good at it, which is weird since i was pretty bad at Halo 2.

presto117

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> MP part looks really sucky and boring...

neojam

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I love how quick the Kotaku community is to bash an anticipated release.

ohnoez

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Crysis doesn't look as good as Halo3. (Not graphically, just as a game overall)

dandd

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> This looks pretty awful.

xerus`

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> The gunplay looks slightly less advanced, and significantly less enjoyable, than GoldenEye 007.

Which came out ten years AGO.

On the N64.

Mister Adequate

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Huxle: Actually, as soon as you fire a weapon while cloaked all of your suit energy is drained so you can't remain invisible for long.

Heyyou27

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Standing still and firing a shotgun over and over until your enemy dies? Awesome.

Brb, spending $3000 to upgrade my pc.

kayone

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Kaedex: Not as big of a joke as trying to compare 2 games that arent even "released" yet. ;D

Witzbold

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> what a joke, ut3 multiplayer is 100 yeara ahead of crysis.

Kaedex

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @kyosen:

how much of crysis have you played? casue based off of what i have seen over the past week in the beta no there are many console and pc games that are farther ahead than crysis. yes it has those top notch graphics but in gameplay it feels like a came from the early 90's. thats the only way to explain it.

ad no i am not talking halo 3 many other games. this is not a list war but basicaly crysis gameplay is bad. what you see in that video is exactly what you experience in the beta which i expect will be very close to the actual game casue its to far along to just go change animations and hiot detection and all that.

is it one of the best looking games made?
yes

but i feel in a years time we won;t be talking bout how good crysis was. just like gears length and crappy hit detection ruined what was a beautifull game. crysis will fall into a similar great looking game fate.

4 years ahead lol funny stuff. as i mentioned in the other thread i been gone for sometime casue i had some friends over to play crysis. yeah they laughed at its so poor. it looks god but plays bad.

i am done explaining it. we will all eventually get to play the game and see how the gameplay kills it. ala lair.

have fun debating it you guys. it will be out soon enough.

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Why the hell is the gametrailers video running on Kotaku's server, extra compressed, as opposed to the GT's embed?

dayeight

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @curtisawa: The only thing that matters when you say "Five years ahead" is gameplay. Graphics are so fucking good across every platform except the Wii that they are nearly a non-factor until we're ready to punch out of the Uncanny Valley.

And Crisis' art direction does not give it any visual impact.

DannoHung

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Looks like Urban Terror or Counterstrike, really.

Sound was good, but it wasn't spectacular.

fuzzycuffs

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> That looked pretty bland... and also the guys playing SUCKED. Either that, or it's impossible to kill people in this game. Did anyone else notice that half the people getting shot didn't even bother to turn around, or EVADE?

And don't tell me they don't know where the bullet hits are comin from because ala Call of Duty style there's hit direction on your screen. Turn and blast their fucking face off. Don't stand there like a goon.

amazinglarry

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> The MP looks like FEAR to me.

Buttpickle

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> 5 Years ahead? No. It's beyond anything on consoles atm, but that by no means it's 5 years ahead. That's just in terms of graphics. At this point, it's about impossible to make an FPS that's ahead of anything in terms of gameplay. But, that doesn't really mean much seeing how a total lack of innovation and ingenuity can create the success of Halo 3. I think it goes without saying that Halo 3 is proof that you just need to recreate the classics. Personally, I hope no one learns that lesson. But they will. Money teaches all.

kyosen

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I've been playing the multiplayer beta and the level they showed in the video is not nearly as cool as what's currently available on fileplanet. I don't know who put together that video, but there's so many cooler aspects of the game in the beta that were not displayed. They should have shown one of the teams acquiring the nuke, or a sniper hiding at the top of a hill within tall grass and bushes.

Heyyou27

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Looks like an FPS to me. Not that that's a bad thing, mind you, but I don't see what makes this game really any different than other PC or console shooters with multiplayer.

RedFive

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Honestly, the MP looks like Halo 3 (minus the color), which is basically Halo 2, which is basically.. (fill in the blank).

Who knows, maybe it plays a lot better than it looks, but it just looks average. Here's hoping for the single player to be awesome.

.endejas.

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Team Fortress 2 > Crysis MP

DigitalHero

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Game's boring as all hell. The suit stuff is interesting but it's just dull and generic overall. I guess it wins in the "looks prettier than you" category.

Thrallok

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Graphically this video sucks compared to what I can play on my pc, with everything on low. Don't judge graphics by this video, cause they don't make justice at all to the real game.

Waka in Japan

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> People seem to be expecting a lot more from this game than they should be. An FPS is an FPS. As for people saying UT3 will be better, it is up to tastes. Somehow, I have a feeling UT3 will be a lot like...UT2004. [i]Shocking[/i], I know.

Yuki

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Don't care about this, as I'm mainly interested in the single player experience.

Although I did expect a little more.

Tyber_Zann

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Even Haze looks looks more interesting then this.

CrimsonAngel

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> You know, it is funny people are judging the multi-player part of this game by a short clip on a small portion of one map. If everyone jumps all over the game after the demo comes out, it will make more sense to me. I know some here have played the beta and have heard a few complaints, so I hope they get it right by the time it is released.

homernoy

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I'll wait for the 360 version. Or PS3 version, whichever one comes out.

Samos42

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> That invisibility looks like trouble...

Dudemeister

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Spoit:

like has been stated theres no question crysis looks fantastic. it plays like garbage. thats the thing.

maybe you have played maybe you haven't. theres still keys left over at fileplanet if you hurry and you can see for yourself. i was not impressed but it was pretty.

best part of the game was driving my jeep right into the ocean and just sitting there for 40 mins. not once did i drown or anything. the jeep did stop working after a second or 2. thats when i realized i could sneak around way under the water. pop up climb a ladder and kill 2 or 3 guys and take the factory. very boring. not to mention all the animations look like they are from the original xbox. charcters sliding around shooting not at you but in the air yet hitting you. its just not a complete experience and not fun. i tried i did. theres others that do multiplayer much better.

with that said i will def be trying the single player demo casue its a beautiful game. maybe its just the beta or its just the multiplayer sucks. we will see. so far i went from excited when i saw the first videos to disapointed after playing the beta. few months ago i would have flamed anyone talking bad about crysis lol. but it underdelivers greatly

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> SP>>>>>>>>MP,
that was a HUGE letdown
*yawnfest*

Naif

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Looks pretty, but very standard gameplay. Maybe someday, when my computer won't melt from trying to play it.

PapaBear434

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Oh yeah, and this is actually probably one of the least impressive of the multiplayer videos on the site. The one on the top of the carrier shows the lighting engine a lot better

Spoit

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Those complaining about the graphics should follow the link to the actual video. Kotaku's player makes it a lot smaller, and there is a HD version of it available too.

Spoit

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> You can drive jeeps and tanks too?! Amazing!

Player2

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @RaepGoblin:

Are you talking to your BFF Jill?

Adam In Texas

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Sniper rifles, shotguns, active camo, cyber suit, melee attack... man, this is totally 5-6 years ahead of Halo.

Player2

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> honestly... I care little for the multiplayer aspect of this game. The single player campaign looks outstanding. Five years ahead outstanding... well I don't think so. However they have been ridiculously innovative with the single player mode in both gameplay and graphics, and that's just good for the industry. Keeps people always pushing the edge to one-up the others.

XsTatiC

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Boboh:

is there even a knife to use for stabbing? i haven't found one yet. there is a melle but it usually just smack you with either the gun or his fists.

maybe i just missed the option to buy a knife and use it. idk. will fire up the beta in a few and take a look

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Ooooooh, a boxy rail yard level!

Far Cry's multiplayer was terrible, this looks...uninspired.

Brendar

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> The guy playing in this video is a chicken. He's close enough to stab & tea-bag the enemy. He decides to shoot the guy, but not in the head, instead he shoots the guy in the lower back, WTF.
Nothing more fun then stabbing then tea-bagging, IMHO.

Boboh

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Completely unimpressive. The single player stuff has looked nice, but this looks like it must be on the lowest possible settings. COD 4 destroys this in terms of photo-realistic multiplayer and TF2 just seems to have a lot more style. This game has taken too long to come out and it's looking less and less interesting.

Spartan1308™

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> That was the worst video representation of Crysis I have ever seen. I've been in the multi beta since release and can completely say that that video is absolutley not representative of what I have experienced. I dont know what Smoke filled coffin of a level they were playing in but it looked like crap. The multplayer I have experienced has been awesome and very challenging. I not saying its the second coming and w/out flaws. But that video was atrocious.

Paylee

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @MedelliaObscured:

i don;t think that gameplay is from the beat. idk though. i don't remebr those maps in the beta. game is released in like a month. alot of what you see is set in stone. just as halo 3 was very close to the halo 3 beta.

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Circle strafing, check.
Spastic jumping and firing, check.
I saw nothing remarkable in any way. Maybe it looks awesome up close, dunno. Game seems like just another 'jump-y, shoot-y, chase-y' bit (pardons to E. Izzard)

the-hypnotoad

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> well it is just a beta?...ill still wait.

MedelliaObscured

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Technology under all that might be, but it doesn't hide the bland art style.

theGimp

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I think America's Army has set the standard for strategy based FPS shooters. Quake wars does have some of those team play elements. But I am bored with straight up run n' gun shooters, no matter how pretty they are.

hchaudh1

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @baberg: you didnt play it for sure... that is because its a rainy day... the other maps have colors matching the weather...

sinny

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> hahaha, the cloak is the best XD
i love that power...

sinny

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Definately won't be upgrading my rig to play that. I'd rather buy a 360 and Halo/Bioshock than fork over money for new pc parts just to play a shooter than looks no more interesting than Counter-Strike. Dun get me wrong, CS was and is an awesome shooter, but why should I be excited about CS with better graphics and nano-suit powers? I can play CS and Source already

Sekthruth

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> It's like Farcry. Single player is beautiful and fun to play. Mutliplayer is an afterthought.

WatershipDown

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Crytek has never been known for their multiplayer componant. Farcry wasnt great online it was the graphics that everyone drooled over. The single player was ok but it turned once you encountered the monsters can couldnt get headshots off of them (heads would just bobble around). This looks no different, the multiplayer looks OK and looks tacked on but its the graphics Im in love with. The gameplay in the single player will be the deciding factor.

ichiban1081

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> damn FPS's are too common now! make some 3rd person or atleast let the gamer choose!

Malice

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @schnodder: "Killzone 2 looks way better"

QFT, buddy QFT

Huxle

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> OMG did you know they have these games now where you actually see THROUGH the eyes of your character and you hold a gun in front of you?

zaky

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I can't say since I dozed off about 15 seconds in to that clip.

pwnedbynoobs

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Crysis makes me want to become a PC gamer :P

Is it me, or does the invisibility seem to give too much of an advantage, though?

Huxle

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Killzone 2 looks way better

schnodder

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @XanderSan:

You can still do that in multiplayer, though nobody is going to be dumb enough to let you run up to them and superpunch them in the face.

@MrSatan:

I know how to play the game... I'm not saying it's bad, but it's definitely not 6-years-ahead revolutionary.

As far as Team Fortress 2 goes, I am definitely looking forward for the charge to go through on my card. There are very few games I find that appealing, at least as far as short burst of play go, and I'm not entirely sure what it is about it... but I love it.

Heliophage

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Its not the mulitplayer that is 5 years in the future-Crysis mp runs in DX9C, but the SP Campaign which takes full advantage of DX 10, which will set a new bar for GPUs currently and consoles, in the future. Remember when Doom 3 came out on the PC and was then released on the Xbox, I think what MR Yerli is referring to, is the gap that exists between high end gaming PCs and next gen consoles (the 360 and PS3). Looking ahead 4-5 years, when the next-next gen consoles arrive, Crysis SP could very well look like a game played on those consoles.

tasty%20crabcakes.">coffeeguy

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Honestly I think this will end up like Halo 3 - "too much hype not enough delivery" we have been hearing for years that Crysis will be the end all be all of FPSs and it appears to be more of the same. I would call the trailer lackluster at best and would expect this to be a F.E.A.R. meets FarCry comparison.

Seiven

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Uh...all this video proves is that the game is indeed a shooter. It's just a mash-up of various kills. It shows nothing of the actual game mechanics. The only valid judgment to be made from this, is "Yes there is shooting, and this video is poor quality."

Generico

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @MrSatan:

no i have played it. i am not blinded by the hype. i was like wtf the whole time i was playign it. might hit it up later but relally i am, ready to delete the damn beta off my hdd.

if you like it good man. but the truth is 90 percent of us who played it go right back to some other game casue its not all that. thats why theres still tons of keys availible lol. its not a fun game my friend. not at all

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> i out it like this. they took so much time making sure the enviorments look good actual animations of explaosions and such look meh.

did you know you can access wmd at certain points and is sounds awsome but its not. when i first heard the enemy had a nuke i was like oh shit. than i watched it go off. i was like what? that doesn't even look a a nuclear explosion. its things like that they underwelm in.

and vehicles, can we steal them? i have snuck up on many enimei vehicles and find out i canlt stop them casue i don't ahve any explosives, you don;t start with any grenades, or anything.

just meh. thats how i describe it. all the time to uypdate my drivers and yadda yadda yadda just to go back to team fortress 2. like i siad says alot about this game

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @BigChiefSmokem: Are you being sarcastic? The only thing it has in common with Counter-Strike is the fact that you shoot things.

The multiplayer looks tacked on and boring. Single player campaign looks amazing though.

argh

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> All I have to say is you have to play this game to understand how fun it is. Don't listen to the stupid ass naysayers who say it isn't fun. They just don't know how to play the game. The thing that makes Crysis great is the different ways to approach a situation. In my opinion it kicks the shit out of Team Fortress. I'm sure Unreal 3 will kick ass though.

MrSatan

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> The game certainly looks fun enough, but it is definitely lacking in originality, also, I don't think they could have chosen a worse level to show off, all that fog made it look like the game had the draw distance of perfect dark.

trevorb

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> so what exactly is new or "5 yrs ahead"? can't really judge the graphics in that little clip but the gameplay looks "5 years behind".

riskbreaker

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> That's got to be the crappiest shotgun I've ever seen in a FPS. How many fucking shells did he have to pump into the guy standing just a few feet away?

You know, I think there is very little companies can do these days to make an "original" FPS. The genre is tired, and dare I say, a bit played-out? This is coming from someone who used to be a 5+ hours a day hardcore FPS junkie. Sure graphics have improved, but I've seen very little interesting innovation in the last few years.

PissedPS3Fan

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> What the? People are hyping up this?

Suddenly I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything in the least.

Toasticus

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Reminds me of FEAR

belo

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> i am in the beat.

crysis is not fun. hopefully the single palyer will be better.

i sugesst you look at ut3 and half 2 orange box rathe than crysis. particularly team fortress 2.

this game is pretty thats it. evrything else seem,s a after thought. making the game just boring as hell to play

MassaLefty

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I hadn't been paying a lot of attention to Crysis, but I sort of assumed it was going to be a pretty big deal. And that might still be the case, but based on this clip? Yikes. It's looking pretty underwhelming. Visuals look... fine, but not stunning. Sort of how I'd expect a 2007 FPS to look. Comparable to Halo 3 or Resistance, not quite as good as Bioshock. The gameplay... well, again, it doesn't look bad, but it just looks bland. Mybe not the fault of the Crysis devs specifically, FPS's just seem to have reached a point where there's not a lot more to do gameplay-wise, and your best bet is to refine the features that are already there. So from a video i guess it's hard to judge that. But what I particularly disliked about the video were the environments. Utter crap. At this point, I think any given FPS has the opportunity to distinguish itself in two ways: Storytelling or level design. I can't speak for the storytelling here, but the environments were terrible. I'm sure that for MP games, they are perfectly functional, but I'm basing that assumtion on the fact that these levels were perfectly functional in the hundreds of other games that featured generic-feeling variations on The Industrial Park, The Offices, The Jungle, The Combat Training Facility, etc. Why not create something new?

Bleh. Just bleh.

etho

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I no longer understand why developers showcase multiplayer. When you distill a game, every FPS multiplayer follows three paths: the Doom-style deathmatch, the CS-style elimination, and the Battlefield-style objectives-based gameplay (I don't wanna call Enemy Territories a fourth category since there's only been two). The only real way a shooter can distinguish itself is in its singleplayer portion.

That, or have multiplayer so awesome nobody even cares, like Halo.

Gunhaver

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @BigChiefSmokem: ....
Counter Strike Source.
And Fortress Forever, if you want TF "real"...

It looks meh.

MasterOfPastures

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> If, in five years, we play with crap, then yes, Crysis is five years ahead of everything else.

Let's all get together for some Halo this weekend. Yay!

MrWhitmore

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> That's somewhat boring compared to some of the single-player antics. Charging up your strength and just punching your way through a building is pretty epic, but here they seem to have taken all that out and given you a standard deathmatch. It seems an engine much more suited to objective based games and epic set pieces, like assaulting each others bases or something.

XanderSan

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Multiplayer looks like the same old same old, I think UT3 would be better.

Volomon

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @FACT.50:

Not quite 30 hours of single-player, unless you include playing it several times.

How many hours of gameplay are you figuring on? Will it exceed Far Cry's play time?

Cevat Yerli: No it's about 10-12 hours, roughly in this range, but remember there's more replayability and every minute has been filled with three to four times more intensity than Far Cry. It's much more compact and more filled with information, it's a more compact ratio - the way it deals with information. Essentially it's a faster game and the replay value of Crysis is about three to four times that of Far Cry, plus there's a huge multiplayer component which is inherently better than Far Cry as well.

So the summary is you get about 30-40 hours gameplay experience - if you replay of course - and you also get multiplayer as well. [Source]

Heliophage

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Crysis looks so 'meh' it hurts.

This and Hellgate are looking to be the two biggest disappointments of the season. I was really looking forward to both.

Oh well, at least TF2 didn't let me down.

PaulMorel

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Moonshadow101: You saw a laser sight on a sniper-type weapon.

This looks nowhere near as good as what they had at e3 a year and a half ago. What gives?

Cloral

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Heliophage: yayz. Yeah I love huge maps, which is why I have been more of a UT fan than the Quake series.

Witzbold

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Looks like a spiffy version of Turok......using fog to cover up the short draw distance.

SAKY

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> TERRIBLE player physics. I'll stick with Team Fortress 2.

Slint

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Wow that totally looks 5 years ahead of console games. Yeah right.

execrationist

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Wow, was this article made deliberately because one of the Halo fanboys got mad and tried to show Crysis mediocrity where none exists?

Whoaness

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @BigChiefSmokem:

I can assure you it's no Counter-Strike, though I wouldn't say it's bad from not following directly in those footsteps. There is, supposedly, some decent variation in what are now typical FPS multiplayer gametimes, but none that I have experienced first hand.

Gametypes that require organization often feel chaotic and frustrating when the teams exceed the size you would expect in a Counter-Strike-esque game. You'd probably be in the clear if you expected something more Battlefield-like, or a distant crossbreed between the two.

@Witzbold:

If you like big maps, you'll be happy.

Heliophage

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Murdock.: I feel you on that one, this just looks like the same tired old deathmatch we see in every FPS now. I didn't see anything here that made me feel excited...

lestat730

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @BigChiefSmokem: It doesn't.

@Witzbold: CS was once played by people over 14 years old? NO WAI!

Iron_Dragon_2.0

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Nah, not five years, but wow! That game is fast! I think I've been playin' Halo for too long.

Detha

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Who cares about the MP.. Crytek is all about 30 hour SP campaign! Far Cry was by far in my top 3 PC shooters of the past 5 years.

FACT.50

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Witzbold: "...that and the community turned into a bunch of tits"

roflmao

BigChiefSmokem

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Visions of Daikatana dance around in my head.

Well, okay, not that bad but this really did absolutely nothing for me other than disappoint. Why would you release media like this?

HJungle

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @BigChiefSmokem: Id say the original CS, before it got bought out by valve, and went mainsteam was better.

Since it didnt have GODDAMNED STICKY FEET, which just fucked the whole goddamned gameplay making it a total spray and pray fest.

Ever since they added that Ive stayed away from that game like the plague, that and the community turned into a bunch of tits, who just ruins the experience.

Witzbold

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Looks just as boring as all the other shooters since Doom.

PhaserBait

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Yeah, it is.

Halo, the epitome of console multiplayer is a fancy CounterStrike clone. This is a little more.

BlackDove

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Heliophage: in that i love Counter-Strike's gameplay and am eagerly awaiting a "next-gen" version of said game type

kinda reminds me of Soldier of Fortune as well; pseudo realism is my cup of tea when it comes to FPSes (with Team Fortess being the sole exception)

BigChiefSmokem

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> I have to good with "No", Mister Wilson.

Arthois

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> The gun kick-back hit me as call of duty-ish, but I could swear I saw a Spartan Laster at one point.

Moonshadow101

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Hmm, IDK, looks ok I guess. Most of those guys suck btw.

RaepGoblin

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Five years ahead? If by that you mean five years from the average person being capable of affording the PC rig capable of running Crysis at a decent level, then yes.
The MP looks just like every other FPS- oh, but you have powers, so it must be awesome! Yeah, right...

HellblazerUSA

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> It might be more advanced in ways that don't translate well into a 60 second clip. The worlds might be much larger or the number of players might be higher. Or the single player campaign might be 20 or 30 hours long. Or there might be 100 maps to play on. But just on graphics and gameplay, it looks much the same as console shooters.

curtisawa

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Can we get some bigger gunshot sounds?

These things sound like pop-caps...

Obviously, it's nearly impossible to tell without actually going in and playing the game, but, yeah, doesn't seem so "OMG POSSUM!"

Shiny tho.

Wraithfighter

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Multiplayer looks fun, but could get kinda complicated with all those nano-suit powers.

Can't wait for the single-player mode!

exkon

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> This looks like every other MP fps out there. Kinda reminded me of FEAR a bit. :/

If they wanted to impress folks, they really should have tried to pimp the game a lot more by wowing the audience with all of the "super human" skills you are suposed to have at the disposal, instead of the standard run and gun clusterfuck which they showed. Granted they gave little clips of some skills, it wasnt that impressive really.

The only thing five years ahead will be the wait some people will have to partake in while saving up cash to get components to upgrade their rigs to play the damned game. ;D

One thing that does look kinda nice is that the outdoor level gave the feeling of it being rather large, and since Im a big map design whore, that would make me happy.

Witzbold

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Those noises coming out of Cevat Yerli's ass sound an awful lot like words. Wait a minute... I think-- yes! He's talking out of it!

Doomstalk

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @BigChiefSmokem:

In what regard?

Heliophage

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> @Murdock.: Seriously. This game looks different in every way.

saruxiii

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> yup, that's a shooter alright. I would like to think geaphics will look better than that in 5 years.

Royal_Highness

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Crysis: Color is for Sissies

baberg

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Oh thats shockingly boring.

aden.exe

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Even after watching the 1up show, I'm still not overly impressed with Crysis. Although Left 4 Dead looks great.

xenovis

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> looks like it plays a lot like Counter-Strike

that is a good thing

BigChiefSmokem

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Looks mediocre.

OGHowie

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Yup, sure looks like a good multi-player shooter. And thank god! So few of them out there these days

kingclip

]]> <![CDATA[Crysis Multiplayer Rooftop Gameplay]]> Maybe in terms of visual quality? The clips may not be a deciding factor but really looked like every other shooter we've playe din the last 10-15 years.

Murdoc

]]>