<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX - Kotaku Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:18:11 MDT</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:18:11 MDT</pubDate>
		<link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1879502</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Really? They actually wanted to try and make the series interesting? Amazing.</p> <p>Mister Adequate</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mister Adequate]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1879502</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:18:11 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1878835</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Ash,</p>
<p>
Sincerely, those two last lines?...</p>
<p>
The best thing I read today.</p>
<p>
And yes I know it was posted yesterday, I just came back home from overseas. :P</p>
<p>
Take care.</p> <p>Kirth Gersen</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirth Gersen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1878835</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:07:40 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1876612</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
okay.</p>
<p>
Well, there goes the western market, then.  </p>
<p>
Don't get me wrong, it'll sell well to the FF crowd?  but with what they seemed to have going in the action RPG arena looked SWWWWWEEET, and change is nature.  Customizable characters/armor/weapons?  multiplayer?  like an overhead JRPG diablo, but portable?  sign on.  TBC, same as it ever was?  I'll play FFIV, maybe, but more of the same is not what I had in mind in moving consoles.  If anyone had listened to "fans" FFXII wouldn't have been the breath of fresh air it was.  words.  I use 'em.  </p> <p>StratfordX</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[StratfordX]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1876612</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:10:19 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1876354</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This situation reminds me of what happened to Cadillac (GM car brand).</p>
<p>
See, they had all these "loyal" customers who didn't want the styling to change.  Granted, all their loyal customers were 60+ years old, so the cars looked.... dated (to be kind).</p>
<p>
Meanwhile, the japanese luxury makes (Infiniti, Lexus) were grabbing up all the young customers (in the US... Europe still has a bias against japanese luxury brands... but I digress).</p>
<p>
So now all the loyal caddy customers are dead, and  all their kids are driving M35s.</p>
<p>
This "same ol' same ol'" is going to kill Square Enix.</p>
<p>
</p> <p>FlapjacksAreTasty</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[FlapjacksAreTasty]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1876354</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:26:17 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1876174</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@ hako_no_ouijsama</P>
<P>Do you think you're overreacting just a little?</P> <p>pastepunkjames</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[pastepunkjames]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1876174</guid>
		    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:07:21 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1876129</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Yeah Square Enix can suck my cock over this shit, Dragon Quest VIII on the ps2 went from decent game to pain in the ass grinding once your characters hit level 50, it takes upwards of 50,000 exp points to level up your characters around this time and for those not in the know the highest exp you got from a monster that was not a metal slime was around 1000. I was loving the change in design for the new dragon quest, from what I was seeing it looked to have a battle system close to FFXII,(ie not turnbased) a little different but anything that is not mindless grinding is better than that piece of shit aniticauted thing.</p> <p>hako_no_oujisama</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hako_no_oujisama]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1876129</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:53:11 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875818</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875750">SpaceWhale</A>: ...ugh.</P>
<P>*take 5-10 steps*<BR>*5-8 seconds of loading while we do a screen spinning thing, show the enemies and you both load, then menus*<BR>*click "attack", hope you hit the enemy before they do so you keep more HP*<BR>*take turns exchanging hits, until the enemeie(s) - there's usually 5 differnet kinds in this dungeon, or just the saem 5 of varying color*<BR>*victory screen, more loading, here's your XP &amp; gold*<BR>*take 5-10 steps, repeat*</P>
<P>im down for any variation of that, at this point. i think id trade a kidney to have Chrono Trigger's engine made popular again.</P></BR></BR></BR></BR></BR> <p><a href="http://www.hondosbar.com">TheIrishNinja</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheIrishNinja]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875818</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:23:39 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875750</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Turn based games need love still.  I have western games for action.  Keep it up, Japan.  And try to make FFXIII's combat suck less than FFXII's did.</p> <p>SpaceWhale</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceWhale]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875750</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:10:09 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875749</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Thank goodness they listened to the fans.  DQ is the last bastion of old school, turn-based RPG gameplay.  It can stay "old hat" forever and I'll be happy.</p> <p>NighTrekr</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[NighTrekr]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875749</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:09:50 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875628</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I don't mind either way since I have love for both play styles. Variety is the spice of life and I wouldn't want to give up having the choice of playing different styles of games. I would probably quit gaming if suddenly all games became homogeneous and started playing all the same way.</p>
<p>
Now what I'd really love to see on my DS is a game with Seiken Densetsu-styled button-holding charge attacks, Chrono Trigger-esque combination techs that vary by the class-type of other players in an ad-hoc multiplayer mode, and Four Swords inspired cooperative puzzles and antics.</p>
<p>
You may have my wallet once you release this game, Square!</p> <p>Ainai</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ainai]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875628</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:37:24 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875559</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875371">g8or8de</A>: me too. you give them an enjoyable new system of combat like shenmue and FF XII, anything other than, you know, 20 years of active time battle, and they bitch.</P>
<P>give em what they want, they bitch "same old, same old". and you cry alla way to the bank.</P>
<P>some of you should be happy - this proves all that whining inevitably = FF VII remake.</P> <p><a href="http://www.hondosbar.com">TheIrishNinja</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheIrishNinja]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875559</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:14:51 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875554</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Dear Square Enix,</p>
<p>
I have played Dragon Quest for a long time, and i was pissed when i heard that Dragon Quest IX would be an action RPG.  We are not amused. If you do not make it turn based, i will walk right up to your headquarters and set the building on fire. Then i will obtain a firearm and become "an hero".  </p>
<p>
Sincerely,<br>
Angry Dragon Quest Fan</p> <p>bigman88zz</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigman88zz]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875554</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:13:28 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875371</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I would have preferred the action RPG.</P> <p>g8or8de</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[g8or8de]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875371</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:19:29 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875359</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
its fine for squeenix to keep a franchise to a certain gameplay convention... turn-based in this case. since afterall, that's how DQ games were.</p>
<p>
after all, squeenix has their own action-rpg franchise for people not into turn-based games. it's called kingdom hearts. i mean, if we were up to the 9th installment of kingdom hearts, i would find it rather weird for them to convert to a turn-based system.</p>
<p>
in the end, i think it's more of a fanbase that was created from the franchise rather than the entire population preferring turn-based over real-time. of course, as a population, japan would seem to prefer turn-based because most rpg franchises were turn-based to begin with.</p>
<p>
personally i like turn-based rpg since it requires some thinking and strategy. i like action rpg since it requires fast response.</p>
<p>
in turn, i don't like turn-based rpg because it can become tedious and boring. like final fantasy  and disgaea. i don't like action rpg because then it just becomes button mashing... like dmc or kh.</p> <p><a href="http://wiidefine.com">phrequency</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[phrequency]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875359</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:16:22 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875353</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875294">Do Kesubei</A>: Why would you play something you don't lik ejust because it's a "big franchise"....that's like going out and buying the new Hannah Montana cd becuase it's popular but you hate it?</P> <p><a href="http://myspace.com/usedtabe">usedtabe</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[usedtabe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875353</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:15:16 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875299</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1875241">Inhert</a>: You haven't played Breath of Fire II on the GBA?</p>
<p>
<b>BRASHFEMHY!!</b></p> <p>Gamemaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamemaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875299</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:02:38 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875294</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I don't really like turn-based RPGs, but I play them because if I want to play the big franchises I have no choice. It really slows things down. I was really looking forward to the action RPG format of DQ, so this is pretty disappointing.</p> <p>Do Kesubei</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do Kesubei]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875294</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:01:30 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875265</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
If you're not a fan of traditional turn-based gameplay in these RPGs then it sucks to be you. Stop trying to ruin the fun of all those of us who enjoy it with your constant bitching please. Thank you.</p> <p><a href="http://www.icb2.com/">RPGZero</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RPGZero]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875265</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:55:48 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875251</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Real time works for brand new games. Like Kingdom Hearts made good use of a real time fight sequence.  Some times though, turn based works. I'm more of a fan about turn based but i do like change other then just the story. I think it would have worked both ways and still would sold in the millions. Who knows though.  </p> <p>Balance_In_Life (PSN)</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balance_In_Life (PSN)]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875251</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:51:47 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875244</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I don't blame myself or other fans; I give them a hearty pat on the back. Action RPGs aren't new or exciting anymore, they're just different from turn-based ones. Turn-based systems can actually be a lot of fun and I don't see why developers are in such a hurry to ditch them just because they're not new or different. Old and traditional is not equivalent to being bad. Most of the new-and-improved combat modes in RPGs now actually play much worse than turn-based systems in my opinion (looking at you, FFXII). DQ and turn-based just go hand-in-hand; if it's not broke, don't fix it. This is a victory for JRPG fans.</p> <p>slacker164</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[slacker164]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875244</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:50:10 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875241</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
bleh, turn-based rpgs on portables are boring. I don't think I've ever beaten one.</p> <p>Inhert</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inhert]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875241</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:49:37 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875231</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>It was a bit of a strange choice to change DQ as far as im aware though. I've heard that DQ has always been very traditional. Compare this to FF which has seen many changes. So why not just try the action rpg style on FF? <BR>Quite a few FF fans complain about changes but they always seem to get used to it anyway. </P></BR> <p>Zim</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zim]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875231</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:47:43 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875229</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Poor Dragon Quest.  If you think Final Fantasy catches hell for reinventing itself, think again.  Still, I was surprised that even the Japanese went berserk.</p>
<p>
I'll still get this though.  Dragon Quest is Dragon Quest, action, turn-based, or otherwise.</p>
<p>
To those complaining about the "poor sales", Dragon Quest 8 sold incredibly well world-wide.  Not Final Fantasy numbers, but it sold up to expectations.  Square Enix dumped a lot of money into the international release to give it voice acting and orchestral music that even the Japanese didn't get.  As a result, it was also the most evolved of any of the games in the series.  It was actually well received for doing just the right amount of new stuff for the series while still using just the right amount of traditional gameplay which, to be frank, just doesn't appear anymore and makes it really stand out.</p> <p><a href="http://liofan.blogspot.com">Rebochan</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebochan]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875229</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:47:31 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875197</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Hm. I'm surprised nobody's brought up Bethesda and/or Fallout 3 yet in this discussion.</p> <p>Kinsman</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinsman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875197</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:38:50 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875165</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Dragon Quest is basically defined by the fact that it's completely unevolved. And Square is surprised that people don't want to see it changed? Sheesh.</P>
<P>-Geoff<BR><A href="http://www.alinktothefuture.com/">[www.alinktothefuture.com]</A></P></BR> <p>BloodyDuck</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BloodyDuck]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875165</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:27:54 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875141</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I hate the DQ games. After all this time, they're one of the least evolved series out there. Barely any story... ultra-generic battles, It's basically a gussied up NES game. This is why the series sells so badly everywhere but Japan. <br>
Who wants to play a turn based RPG with little attachment to a story or to your characters personalities? What's the point? To just level up, and fight a lot of battles? That's stupid, and not fun. Why are people driven by this at all? Do you have some sort of disorder?</p> <p>otimus</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[otimus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875141</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:20:35 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875140</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I blame the Japanese. After reading that article that Ashcraft didn't awhile back it really shows how stuck the Japanese are in their gaming ways. Square Enix should have stood their ground and gone ahead with it anyways. I'm sure the fans would have understood if what they were doing was a better way of doing it. </p>
<p>
This also goes to show what seems as the eventual downfall of the Japanese gaming companies.</p> <p>Zyzex</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zyzex]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875140</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:20:30 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875116</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
"<i>Don't blame Square Enix for the same old hat.</i>"</p>
<p>
Old hat? I haven't seen the <i>old hat</i> since the SNES, and it was beautiful. Not this cyber-punk emo shit they keep pumping out.</p> <p>MasaMuneCyrus</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MasaMuneCyrus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875116</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:15:59 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875114</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Ah, good to see. Now if only we can get all the other mindless button mashers killed off, so we can get more cool (preferably turn based) battle systems going I'll be most happy. </p>
<p>
That said goodness can be found inbetween - just look at the wonderful Knights of hte Old Republic or Jade Empire.</p> <p>Ninjakoala</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninjakoala]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875114</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:15:08 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875072</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Well what would happen if Nintendo would come out with a new Zelda -game with turn based battles? Wouldn't we flip? </p>
<p>
Wait a minute, that actually might be kinda cool...</p> <p>Yukito</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yukito]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875072</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:08:35 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875047</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
The thing about Dragon Quest is that it's not really Dragon Quest unless it is exactly the same as the previous games in the series.</p>
<p>
I'm with Japan on this one. Any change, no matter how small, makes it less like "proper" Dragon Quest.  If Square Enix want to make an action RPG, they can make a Dragon Quest-ish side story, or just use another IP.</p> <p><a href="http://www.myspace.com/mintsauce82">mintsauce</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[mintsauce]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875047</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:04:24 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875020</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
oh my god kotaku! i rely on you guys for the most up to date news on videogames , this topic is at least 2 months old . this is the only time i've only caught you guys doing this ,so i'll forgive you (well if you can forgive my spelling)but don't let it happen again , i dont want to be wrong when i tell someone no game news is more recent than kotaku's period!  now get cracking on some new news <br>
2 weeks old news is forgivable but none later, next time you get the willow and i'll make you guys go out and cut your own branch.</p> <p>haggen</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[haggen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875020</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:57:33 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1875007</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Guys, I hate to be the one to point this out, but this is semi-old news. Sqeenix revealed this weeks ago. Plus, it's still turn-based, but there's no longer any random encounters (think Grandia, or Lunar).</P>
<P>Plus, this is Dragonquest! The biggest RPG franchise in Japan! Maybe the biggest video-game franchise in Japan, period! This is a series that shut down Japan completely when 3 was released. It's always been about tradition. The reaction alone proves it, alot of people still like traditional turn-based battle.</P>
<P>Frankly, i'm happy they decided not to change that much after all. I'm looking forward to this more now than I was before. Despite the switch back, the graphics are still beautiful, and you can still customize your character, and that's something.</P>
<P>I'm gonna pre-order the minute a US release is announced.</P> <p>Maniaxe</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maniaxe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1875007</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:53:58 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874966</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1874945">androvsky</a>: They're just sore because Microsoft just had a bunch of trailers, Nintendo had a standing pad they weren't interested in and Sony brought out "teh c0nfusion" with their awfully announced price cuts.</p>
<p>
They probably don't feel as special as usual after this "downgraded" E3. :)</p> <p>Gamemaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamemaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874966</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:45:24 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874963</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1874945">androvsky</a>: Exactly.  If people don't get that, then they don't know what the Dragon Quest series is all about.</p>
<p>
I was fine with it as an action RPG, I'm fine with it being turn-based.  It's Dragon Quest!  Either way, it will be awesome.</p>
<p>
By the way, didn't this get announced months ago?  Because I've known about this for a while.</p> <p><a href="http://www.cobuccio.com">xkc20d</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[xkc20d]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874963</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:44:58 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874956</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@  CZROE</p>
<p>
Uh... which version are you talking about?  Certainly DQ 1-3 were turn based.  They virtually pioneered the system.</p>
<p>
BTW, You heard it here first. Terrinigma II and Spike McFang II 2008.
Terrinigma is going the Drakkhen route and Spike McFang is going pen
and paper only.</p>
<p>
Ahh, jokes no-one will get.</p> <p>ego531</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ego531]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874956</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:44:23 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874950</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Action RPGs can have just as much strategy as their turn-based counterparts. You just have to be a tid bit quicker on your feet then you normally would waiting for a fucking bar to fill.</p>
<p>
Not that I don't like Turn-Based RPGs. Hell, the majority of my youth was spent on them. But a developer, especially as one as giant as Squeenix, caving into pissy people like this only makes me lose even <i>more</i> respect for them.</p>
<p>
And what the hell is up with these so called "fans" ? Aren't we usually the ones who cry at our developers for being too stale in their gameplay to begin with?</p>
<p>
As a DS title, I think it should be a spin-off instead of the ninth installment anyway. People would probably bitch quite less, and we'd probably have a very interesting experiment on our hands.</p>
<p>
<i>*sigh*</i></p> <p>Icepick.Evans</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Icepick.Evans]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874950</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:41:46 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874947</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1874934">creid</a>: Of course... Attack, Move...</p> <p>Gamemaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamemaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874947</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:41:06 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874945</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Why is anyone looking towards Dragon Quest for change in gameplay?  If anything, it's been one of the few holdouts, with DQ 8 for the PS2 having pretty much the same battle system as the first one for the original NES.  DQ has spin-off series like DQ: Heroes and DQ: Monsters are for experimenting with gameplay.</p>
<p>
If you really can't stand turn-based gaming, why are you playing DQ?  Try Final Fantasy 11 or 12 (maybe 13), or any of the "Tales of " series.  Or Folklore, or Zelda, or one of a billion other action-rpgs.</p>
<p>
And while I'm used to sarcasm from Kotaku, it seems like it's been getting laid on a bit thick today.  Everyone okay after e3?  Pushing buttons is hard, really?  Because going real-time increases button pushing that much, even though that usually means the computer takes over for the other party members?  Or is taking care of one character that hard for you?</p> <p>androvsky</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[androvsky]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874945</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:40:31 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874944</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Turn-based = free to be able to eat, smoke, and drink in between turns. That's a goodie for me!</p> <p>RiceBandit</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RiceBandit]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874944</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:40:10 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874934</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I love turn based combat - done right.  IMO DQVIII was not turn based combat done right, it was turn based combat circa 1988.  They have refused to integrate the improvements that have come from Grandia, FFX, or Xenosaga.  Action-based is just what the series needed, and a bunch of whiners had to blow it.  Here's a note to all the complainers: there can be more to a battle system than Attack, Magic, Run.</p> <p><a href="http://pizza.cintulanation.com">creid - is not New to Kotaku</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[creid - is not New to Kotaku]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874934</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:38:14 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874933</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
It's nice that they're willing to change a major franchise like this, but Dragon Quest is such a juggernaut in Japan, it doesn't surprise me much that they would make changes to please the fans.  I think it's best that they keep Dragon Quest tradition, and keep changing Final Fantasy.</p> <p>Benjo</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874933</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:38:10 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874932</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>As long as it doesn't have long into-battle transitions, and long "You got XP!" and out-of-battle etc transitions, I don't mind.</P> <p>aelfin</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[aelfin]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874932</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:37:56 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874931</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
It all depends on how things are implemented in the game...Action RPG can be GREAT.</p> <p>roudy000</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[roudy000]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874931</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:37:54 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874916</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Hey, I like turn based RPG. Usualy strategy means more than how fast you can press the buttons. </p> <p>mustang</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[mustang]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874916</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:35:05 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874904</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
It bothers me when developers cave in to the public before the public really knows what a change in a game type means. They heard "action RPG" and freaked out, but who knows what Squeenix had planned? It could have been great!</p>
<p>
Besides, isn't DQIX the one coming to the DS? An action RPG on the DS can mean a lot of different (potentially interesting) things. A turn-based RPG will pretty much always be the same no matter what it's on. </p> <p>Sawboss</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sawboss]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874904</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:31:10 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874900</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1874872">roudy000</a>: Not really, I mean, sure most random battles are the standard attack, magic, defend. But when it comes to timing attacks, casting statistical spells, and switching characters in and out tons of strategy is required. Much more than hacking away and healing.</p> <p>Gamemaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamemaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874900</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:30:27 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874898</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I feel so guilty...wait I havent played that game since the NES.</P> <p>yashichi8bit</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[yashichi8bit]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874898</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:29:47 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874878</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I wish SOE would have listened to SWG's fans!</p> <p>EnigmaNemesis</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnigmaNemesis]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874878</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:26:13 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874873</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
It's been a long time since I played a DragonQuest/DragonWarrior game, but wasn't it traditionally NEITHER turn-based NOR active? It was random encounters that automatically played out. I'm sure it transitioned into something more like Earthbound though (some input, only weak trivial battles are automatic).</p> <p>CZroe</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[CZroe]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874873</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:25:08 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874872</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
DQ is a great franchise and I understand why people want to keep it the way it is, but why not try at least...This was i think a great step in a new direction for the series. And for those saying real time as less strategy, i dont find more startegy in attack ; magic ; defend, its always like playing rock paper scisor. I was expecting DQIX to be as refrshing as FFXII in term of combat...</p> <p>roudy000</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[roudy000]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874872</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:24:54 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874871</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Good. My #1 complaint and the reason why I wouldn't have bought it has been rectified.</p>
<p>
...now, to buy a DS. :X</p> <p>Revolutionary</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revolutionary]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874871</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:24:39 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874868</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1874850">Gamemaster</a>: If done right, an action RPG can have just as much strategy. Just because it hasn't been done yet doesn't mean it can't happen. Think sortof along the lines of a turn-based Action-RPG. The ONLY difference is instead of selecting from a menu, certain commands can be executed with a single button press.</p> <p>RealmRPGer</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RealmRPGer]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874868</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:24:01 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874864</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is exactly why the Japanese videogame market is losing foreign customers. Old over New, Same over Change. Although, sometimes change is a bad thing...<br>
Just look at Dawn of Mana. Maybe this will be the best Dragon warrior ever, or not. Time will tell.</p> <p>Ghede</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghede]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874864</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:23:09 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874860</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Though I'm not really an RPG fan at all, i do prefer turn based to real time. So as this is the first DQ i might actaully play i dont mind at all really.</p> <p>Neon</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neon]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874860</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:22:07 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874853</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
NOOOOOOOO!!!! CMON! The first vids was looking so great. Why! You Ja...GRRRR...</p> <p>roudy000</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[roudy000]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874853</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:21:29 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Square Enix Wanted to Change Dragon Quest IX]]></title>
		    <link>http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/square-enix-wanted-to-change-dragon-quest-ix-278434.php#c1874850</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I hate action RPGs. They generally have less strategy than turn based games and allow for generally ugly looking fights.</p>
<p>
But it's great that nobody likes turn based games... Real good.</p> <p>Gamemaster</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamemaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">9:278434:c1874850</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:21:13 MDT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>