I'm an iPhone developer, and as someone mentioned above, iPhone OS 3.0 not only supports ratings but requires it. All application submitted to Apple from now on must have a rating of 4+, 9+, 12+ or 17+.
The most important part, however, is that this is retroactive. Existing applications need to be updated, and if they aren't they'll be automatically rated as the most restrictive rating, 17+.
So yeah, problem solved without ESRB. They just want to make cash from the review fees but Apple is eschewing them.
What makes the iPhone/iPod an attractive platform is how easy it is to publish applications for it, and adding ESRB (or any other rating board) to the process would ruin it. I know I wouldn't publish anything if I had to deal with them.
@coolguyface: That's how I see it as well. I do hope Apple ignores the plea as the ratings just aren't effective nor consistent in their claims. The ESRB and MPAA need to die.
@new_age_soldier: You'd be amazed. I pick up my little brother from elementary almost every day, and nearly everyone in his class is calling someone on their bloody iPhones. I, on the other hand, had to wait until I was 17 for my folks to buy me a normal cell phone.
Bah. No new controls, no new purchase. Apples crazy man, if they released an iphone/ipod touch with physical buttons and a dpad, they'd be at next years wwdc with a slide saying 100 million sold.
Seriously, what are they waiting for?
Also, how much faster is this thing than the ipod touch 2g? That thing is already faster than 36 iphones and it has 32g capacity.
@InternetsUser: Like it or not, the iPhone is a gaming platform too and we cover all of them. Six posts out of 70 on the day of WWDC doesn't seem high to me.
(DEAD) Goldwings - Remembered for his bravery and heroism... xD was starred
(DEAD) Goldwings - Remembered for his bravery and heroism... xD was unstarred
@Goldwings: Knows the reason for his avatar pic.: Which makes me pity all the people who spent $600 on this phone when it had no apps, a crappy camera and nothing but a fancy touchscreen at launch.
06/10/09
The most important part, however, is that this is retroactive. Existing applications need to be updated, and if they aren't they'll be automatically rated as the most restrictive rating, 17+.
So yeah, problem solved without ESRB. They just want to make cash from the review fees but Apple is eschewing them.
What makes the iPhone/iPod an attractive platform is how easy it is to publish applications for it, and adding ESRB (or any other rating board) to the process would ruin it. I know I wouldn't publish anything if I had to deal with them.
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/10/09
This generation is so spoiled, god damn.
06/10/09
I had to buy my own.
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
Seriously, what are they waiting for?
Also, how much faster is this thing than the ipod touch 2g? That thing is already faster than 36 iphones and it has 32g capacity.
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
"...until next year when we release an even more powerfuler and fastester iPhone."
06/08/09
It's just not my thing ... congrats to those who were looking forward to this, though.
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
This troll needs to be more specific before it can actually be a flame!
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
Even more so when the iPhone 3G sits pretty at $99 now.
06/08/09
06/08/09
06/08/09
At least they won't have to pay high monthly fees to ATT every month to use it.
06/08/09
It's a lot more appealing visually, though I'm worried about how it will compete with the app store, if it'll even try.