There are two ways to look at this if the law goes through:
1. Everyone else will benefit from this on the fact that any game that's released in the EU will need to exist in a bug-free version that everyone else will be able to buy.
2. The EU has, with one simple law, figured out how to firmly cement themselves back in "third-most important videogame market" status. And they will get even longer delays for how long it takes any US/Japan releases to get sent there, if they don't simply forego any EU releases to start with.
I reckon if I put a piece of bread on top of my 360 when I start playing Street Fighter IV, it'll be toast by the time I'm done. Or alternatively, under my iBook for 3 seconds.
@deanbmmv: Actually video games ARE programs - but then, you already knew that ;)
On the more serious side, you're completely right in that the sorts of limitations that apply to the "purchase" of software (whether it's an app, an OS, a game or whatever) would be unbelieveable in any other industry. The equivalent in the automative sector would be buying a car and - simply by turning the key - essentially having automatically signed an agreement that the vehicle would not necessarily work at all, that you would have no legal recourse if the car should kill your entire family, and that the dealer reserved the right to sell you the actual wheels at a later date for whatever price they deemed appropriate!
Once upon a time I supported the EU. Nowadays they seem to spend their time dishing out pointless fines to Microsoft and imposing new and stupid regulations that no-one really wants.
@MACH1ne: Breathing might as well be a corporate crime according to the EU. Hell, having instant messenger conversations and not relaying them to the consumers will end up being a corporate crime with the way things are going - even if it's to your wife at lunch break.
"Yes honey, I bought the plug."
"What about the lube?"
"Yes yes...wait, we're supposed to talk in code."
"Oh, shit. That's right. This is going to be released."
@MACH1ne: Intel I agree with, but not Microsoft. Bundling your OS with a media player and a web browser can hardly be considered "anti-competitive" when all the other web browsers and media players are free.
I guess Nintendo has to stop bundling their systems with their games hmm? And Sony and MS too? Because thats exactly the same thing.
@Mancomb Seepgood: "Bundling your OS with a media player and a web browser can hardly be considered "anti-competitive" when all the other web browsers and media players are free."
Er, except that they weren't free at all. Netscape, for example.
Surely this only covers the tangible media, and given the life span of a DVD/Blue Ray this should cover the two years no problem. Can I get a refund on Godfather II? That game was shite, but what next? Can we ask Bob Dylan to make sure his next album is good before he releases it... or change it if its not after two years?
@Primebuster: Honestly, though. I love this concept when applied to video games (and other software), but what about other entertainment media? What about opening up the new Aphex Twix release and finding out it's one great big pisstake? Should we be able to say that he didn't create a finished, good-quality product and take it back to the store?
bugs arent pisstakes, theyre errors that weren't fixed. pisstakes are something completely different. and its down to the individual to decide whether its a pisstake or not.
a bug is a bug regardless of the user and im sure the games developer intend to squash as many of them as they can, im not saying for example, a baloon not bursting to bounce you higher is game-breaking. not all bugs are bad enough to merit a refund, but we're talking about something that directly affects your ability to pass or beat parts of a game. those need to be fixed, its definately essential.
say an album, for example was encoded badly, and the sound quality was poor, almost like a low quality MP3. I'd definately demand a refund.
personally i've never played a game that was unfinishable through a bug or error... do these things actually exist? What the hell do they do during the play testing? Blow each other off?
@Lyndonimus: Broken Sword on PS1 had a bug where you could give the red ball away before you needed to use it, meaning you were stuck forever. It sucked!
launch copies of Metroid Prime in the US had a bug where if you left the room where artifact of the warrior appears for the first time without grabbing it, it would disappear and you'd have to restart the game from the beginning
Gamers need to be made aware of unfinished games (for instance by visiting Kotaku) and boycot them by not buying them. There are enough developers who develop good games without bugs, so don't accept excuses as a gamer and consumer from developers.
He said unfinished. Not bug-free. And I agree with him if hes referring to stupid unfinishable games, or seriously broken ones.
But its unreasonable to expect the regular public joe to visit sites like Kotaku. So you can hardly say 'All games must be researched online before purchase'. Or put disclaimers on the box.
@Komrade Kayce: You assume bug-free and unfinished are two different things, but remember the gentleman who proposed this has probably never played a video game before. So he may not.
I agree with you, but as it stands the expectations and standards he is proposing are not currently outlined.
@magictroll: This is stupid because there is no way to determine what is "broken", what is "designed" and what is beyond the control of the developer/publisher to fix. If you buy a CD and the drummer misses his beat you don't get a refund because he is an artist. So are developers. If you buy a game and there are graphical glitches, even if there are minor gameplay flaws, you should not be entitled to a refund.
It is also stupid because companies will no longer try new ideas because something may get broken along the way. Instead they will take the less risky path and release rosta updates.
It is stupid because offering a two year warranty on video games that normally have a 12month (at most) lifespan is open to abuse by consumers, given that most people seem to have no problem (morally) stealing software through torrent sites I hardly doubt they'll have a tough time justifying returning a product for a full refund when they are done with it 22months after purchase.
It is stupid because you do not own software, you purchase a license to use the software. You can't return that license any more than I can return the lease on a car that I have used for over a year.
It is stupid because identical software may be broken for one person and not for another because of other hardware/software that the individual is using and it is almost impossible to test all combinations of all hardware and software in existence.
And finally, you say you are a game dev. Name one game that is "near perfect" in terms of lacking bugs/glitches/graph minors/freezes/crashes/hangs/localisation errors etc. If this law came into force games would never get released.
05/15/09
1. Everyone else will benefit from this on the fact that any game that's released in the EU will need to exist in a bug-free version that everyone else will be able to buy.
2. The EU has, with one simple law, figured out how to firmly cement themselves back in "third-most important videogame market" status. And they will get even longer delays for how long it takes any US/Japan releases to get sent there, if they don't simply forego any EU releases to start with.
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
Put it in a 360 if you want enough heat to actually toast it.
05/15/09
Wow £40 a game for just being licensed it. I kinda understood thats how programs work, but Video Games?
05/15/09
On the more serious side, you're completely right in that the sorts of limitations that apply to the "purchase" of software (whether it's an app, an OS, a game or whatever) would be unbelieveable in any other industry. The equivalent in the automative sector would be buying a car and - simply by turning the key - essentially having automatically signed an agreement that the vehicle would not necessarily work at all, that you would have no legal recourse if the car should kill your entire family, and that the dealer reserved the right to sell you the actual wheels at a later date for whatever price they deemed appropriate!
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
"Yes honey, I bought the plug."
"What about the lube?"
"Yes yes...wait, we're supposed to talk in code."
"Oh, shit. That's right. This is going to be released."
"Yeah... Thanks EU."
05/15/09
I guess Nintendo has to stop bundling their systems with their games hmm? And Sony and MS too? Because thats exactly the same thing.
05/15/09
Er, except that they weren't free at all. Netscape, for example.
05/15/09
05/15/09
having no talent cant be helped.
fixing bugs in videogames and other software is necessary and essential. talent or no.
05/15/09
I love this concept when applied to video games (and other software), but what about other entertainment media?
What about opening up the new Aphex Twix release and finding out it's one great big pisstake? Should we be able to say that he didn't create a finished, good-quality product and take it back to the store?
05/15/09
bugs arent pisstakes, theyre errors that weren't fixed. pisstakes are something completely different. and its down to the individual to decide whether its a pisstake or not.
a bug is a bug regardless of the user and im sure the games developer intend to squash as many of them as they can, im not saying for example, a baloon not bursting to bounce you higher is game-breaking. not all bugs are bad enough to merit a refund, but we're talking about something that directly affects your ability to pass or beat parts of a game. those need to be fixed, its definately essential.
say an album, for example was encoded badly, and the sound quality was poor, almost like a low quality MP3. I'd definately demand a refund.
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
launch copies of Metroid Prime in the US had a bug where if you left the room where artifact of the warrior appears for the first time without grabbing it, it would disappear and you'd have to restart the game from the beginning
05/15/09
The Mono audio in GH III for Wii and the unfinishable Tomb Raider come to mind.
Sadly, my beloved Bethesda would take a pretty big shot in the balls for this, too. :(
05/15/09
Gamers need to be made aware of unfinished games (for instance by visiting Kotaku) and boycot them by not buying them. There are enough developers who develop good games without bugs, so don't accept excuses as a gamer and consumer from developers.
05/15/09
Name one video game that was released without bugs or glitches and i'll refrain from calling you a stupid imbecile.
05/15/09
He said unfinished. Not bug-free. And I agree with him if hes referring to stupid unfinishable games, or seriously broken ones.
But its unreasonable to expect the regular public joe to visit sites like Kotaku. So you can hardly say 'All games must be researched online before purchase'. Or put disclaimers on the box.
05/15/09
05/15/09
I would say Space Invaders but that had a glitch that made the aliens go faster each time you killed one.
05/15/09
As well as changing direction, and dropping a line.
05/15/09
I agree with you, but as it stands the expectations and standards he is proposing are not currently outlined.
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
It is also stupid because companies will no longer try new ideas because something may get broken along the way. Instead they will take the less risky path and release rosta updates.
It is stupid because offering a two year warranty on video games that normally have a 12month (at most) lifespan is open to abuse by consumers, given that most people seem to have no problem (morally) stealing software through torrent sites I hardly doubt they'll have a tough time justifying returning a product for a full refund when they are done with it 22months after purchase.
It is stupid because you do not own software, you purchase a license to use the software. You can't return that license any more than I can return the lease on a car that I have used for over a year.
It is stupid because identical software may be broken for one person and not for another because of other hardware/software that the individual is using and it is almost impossible to test all combinations of all hardware and software in existence.
And finally, you say you are a game dev. Name one game that is "near perfect" in terms of lacking bugs/glitches/graph minors/freezes/crashes/hangs/localisation errors etc. If this law came into force games would never get released.
05/15/09
05/15/09
03/22/09
03/22/09
03/22/09
(*removes belt*)
YOU MADE ME DO THIS!!!
03/22/09
03/22/09
"That's one BANGING blender!"
03/22/09