Kotaku 
Enter your username and password.
Denver, 10:15 AM
Mon Nov 23
32 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip us: tips@kotaku.com
Editor-In-Chief:
Brian Crecente
Email | AIM | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Stephen Totilo
Email | AIM | Twitter
Senior Editor:
Michael McWhertor
Email | AIM | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor, Japan:
Brian Ashcraft
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, East Coast:
Michael Fahey
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Oceania:
Luke Plunkett
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Weekends:
Owen Good
Email | AIM | Twitter
Correspondent, San Francisco:
AJ Glasser
Email | AIM | Twitter
Columnist:
Leigh Alexander
Columnist:
Tim Rogers
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
No idea why I do that to myself, really... #startrekonline
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
Edit: Here it is, found it: [kotaku.com]
"...and that canon things like the Borg might show up."
11/12/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
｡･ﾟ･(ﾉД`)･ﾟ･｡ #startrekonline
11/11/09
Though really you should be able to run it on a PADD #startrekonline
11/11/09
11/11/09
I know, I know... I need to upgrade. Stupid single core is the main thing slowing me down in modern gaming /sigh.
What can I say, I've made a big shift to consoles lately and MMOs are all that interest me in PCs these days. Mostly older ones that run fine like EQ 1/2, Eve, WAR, etc.
Maybe if my stupid student loan people weren't absorbing my tax rebates I would be able to upgrade /bitter #startrekonline
11/11/09
11/11/09
I'll get to a point where I can justify a new computer in my budget, but right now, not gonna upgrade for one or two games I may be interested in for a month or so. #startrekonline
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/10/09
I'm confused by this - you seem to be saying two contradictory things here. "Snappy movement" and "huge starship" don't mix.
One of the big reasons almost no Star Trek game has ever been successful in the slightest is that ship-to-ship combat is always terribly unrealistic, and therefore unsatisfying. Not that the shows or movies were always very realistic either, but at least most of them understood the idea of mass.
These are large capital ships that do take time to move around. Combat is less about maneuvering and speed and more about strategy and bringing firepower to bear - more like the way battles were fought between capital ships on the high seas in the 1700's and 1800's. Game developers never treat Star Trek starships that way, thinking it's no fun to fight with capital ships.
Well, all you've gotta do is watch Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan to see that that's not true - the whole movie was just a long, drawn-out battle between capital ships (that for once, was actually fought in real 3D). But it's the best Star Trek movie there is. (Yes, I've seen the latest one.)
Just once, I would like to see ship to ship combat handled *at least* as realistically in a video game as it was in the various series' and movies. No Trek game that I've played has done it, and it doesn't sound like this one will either.
And before you say "it just wouldn't sell" - none of the other Trek games have sold very well either. So I'm not sure that argument's very relevant. Why not *try* to actually please the many millions of Trek fans, rather than attempting to make a game for some non-existent mass audience? #startrekonline
11/10/09
Wrath of Khan definitely gets my vote for best Star Trek movie because of how it treats space combat. Huge capital ships shouldn't zip around like fighters like they do in every other Star Trek film. #startrekonline
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/09/09