@ithyphallus, lazy beareaucrat: The only jealous people are the ones who bought it, as they're jealous of the ones who got to save thier $$$. I'm one of those jealous folk, Impulse purchases FTL! Why didn't I try the trial??:D
@Archaotic: Some factors to consider:
-Less competition on PSN
-Cost to port it may be minimal, ROI will be great
-These sorts of games don't cost a lot to make. Break even points for many is 30-50K units. If it sells only 20K on XBLA, it might get another 25K on PC and PS3 combined.
I'm going to partly disagree with you here on one major thing here Fahey, combat.
The combat system, a very x-wing like style, is better then advertised and plays slightly better on a 2d plane verses a first person view. The tactics of it are actually enjoyable.
but agreed, it isn't... star trekie enough. and is very limited in gameplay styles.
What do people expect from a half arsed Game that is only the milk from a milked movie? Nobody expected it to be an amazing game, better than Fallout 3 or Devil May Cry did they?
I haven't tried it yet, but I laugh in the face of people who think this could've actually been anything above a mediocre game.
You want a quickie Star Trek game? Clone Star Control. The first one. This would be a welcomed addition with Live support, and I was hoping for just that when I saw the screenshots. This looks too simplified to be entertaining or have much depth, like a Star Trek skinned Armada.
@bobdisgea3: How can you hate it? Never having watched Star Trek growing up and seeing the movie, I couldn't help but be pulled into the universe. By the end of the film, I was thinking of where I could get my own set of pointy ears.
@zgreenwell: Five dollar XBLA games trickle out from time to time. The last one I think was Minesweeper Flags back in February. Microsoft seems to want to have it so that XBLCG games comprise the lower pricing tier while XBLA games sport a higher price tag. Seemingly reacting to the complaints about XBLA pricing post-Braid, Trixie 360 did a spot highlighting $5 games, and they were all old XBLA titles or CG stuff. I think this would be a fine plan, and XBLCG development is starting to churn out some great stuff and gradually getting more professional looking, but too many XBLA titles still feel overpriced -- Death Tank and Lode Runner in particular.
Hopefully this isn't a pricing error on Microsoft's part a la Lode Runner. I'd definitely grab Blazing Birds for 400 but only if it stays that cheap to ensure a decent about of people to squash on-line with my mad angry futuristic unicycle badminton skills with a "Z."
The new Trek is a terrific movie, and a pretty cool take on the classic material. It would have been nice if it had some more solid science fiction ideas at it's core, along the lines of "City at the Edge of Forever," but at least we get treated to a damn fine Balance of Terror sort of actioner.
Overzealous lighting design aside, I can't really complain much about any missteps the Abrams & co. made since I think Fry's description of the original series on Futurama was pretty accurate: "You know, 1966, 79 episodes...about 30 good ones."
But finally getting around to the Kobayashi Maru related point (spoiler-ish?): I was actually a little disappointed in the way Kirk's cheating on the Kobayashi Maru test went down in the movie. I was hoping for something a little subtler, like basically just hacking the ships' stats, instead of having the test break down in the middle and reboot, and magically the Klingons are defenseless. Of course, it takes place in alternate reality, so maybe altKirk just lacked the subtlety that oldKirk would have used. That's why oldKirk got a commendation for thinking outside the box, whereas altKirk got a court hearing (probably owing largely to his insufferably douchey attitude rubbing the instructors the wrong way).
@wanion: Not that your post spoiled the film for me (I've seen it 3 times), but the next time you decide to make a post with so many spoilers about a film/game/TV show, that a lot of people probably have not seen yet - don't.
Or at least have the decency to dedicate a full line notating 'SPOILER' in bold, all caps, so as not risk anyone who may have missed the shitty shitty spoiler warning ("spoiler-ish?", c'mon, give me a break) that you placed in you post. Below is a example of how a spoiler warning is done right (if you must insist on spoiling things for everyone else).
**** SPOILER BELOW ****
See. Piece o'cake. Even a 2-year old chimp with half a shred of decency could do that, and spare some poor soul out there all manner of agony.
You know Ahora? I'd toss my red matter in the core of her planet, if you know what i mean. (i'm implying i want to implode it and kill all of her planet's inhabitants.)
09/10/09
09/11/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
trust me, no one's jealous across all platforms
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
07/25/09
I don't think releasing it months late on PS3 and PC is really going to get them many more sales...
07/26/09
-Less competition on PSN
-Cost to port it may be minimal, ROI will be great
-These sorts of games don't cost a lot to make. Break even points for many is 30-50K units. If it sells only 20K on XBLA, it might get another 25K on PC and PS3 combined.
05/20/09
Hey! That's just like the movie!
05/20/09
The combat system, a very x-wing like style, is better then advertised and plays slightly better on a 2d plane verses a first person view. The tactics of it are actually enjoyable.
but agreed, it isn't... star trekie enough. and is very limited in gameplay styles.
05/20/09
I haven't tried it yet, but I laugh in the face of people who think this could've actually been anything above a mediocre game.
05/21/09
I would buy a Devil May Cry clone where Dante is replaced with Shatner-Kirk and the enemies with Klingons.
The rest can stay the same.
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/21/09
@imdstig: Probably.
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
Ninja Turtles Arcade game is 400 points when it launched.
05/20/09
05/20/09
[www.xbox.com]
The Kotaku article stated it was 800 points.
[kotaku.com]
Hopefully this isn't a pricing error on Microsoft's part a la Lode Runner. I'd definitely grab Blazing Birds for 400 but only if it stays that cheap to ensure a decent about of people to squash on-line with my mad angry futuristic unicycle badminton skills with a "Z."
05/12/09
Overzealous lighting design aside, I can't really complain much about any missteps the Abrams & co. made since I think Fry's description of the original series on Futurama was pretty accurate:
"You know, 1966, 79 episodes...about 30 good ones."
But finally getting around to the Kobayashi Maru related point (spoiler-ish?): I was actually a little disappointed in the way Kirk's cheating on the Kobayashi Maru test went down in the movie. I was hoping for something a little subtler, like basically just hacking the ships' stats, instead of having the test break down in the middle and reboot, and magically the Klingons are defenseless. Of course, it takes place in alternate reality, so maybe altKirk just lacked the subtlety that oldKirk would have used. That's why oldKirk got a commendation for thinking outside the box, whereas altKirk got a court hearing (probably owing largely to his insufferably douchey attitude rubbing the instructors the wrong way).
05/13/09
Or at least have the decency to dedicate a full line notating 'SPOILER' in bold, all caps, so as not risk anyone who may have missed the shitty shitty spoiler warning ("spoiler-ish?", c'mon, give me a break) that you placed in you post. Below is a example of how a spoiler warning is done right (if you must insist on spoiling things for everyone else).
**** SPOILER BELOW ****
See. Piece o'cake. Even a 2-year old chimp with half a shred of decency could do that, and spare some poor soul out there all manner of agony.
05/12/09