<![CDATA[Kotaku: pete hines]]> http://tags.kotaku.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/kotaku.com.png <![CDATA[Kotaku: pete hines]]> http://kotaku.com/tag/petehines http://kotaku.com/tag/petehines <![CDATA[Bethesda Clarifies No Elder Scrolls V Statement]]> Last week at QuakeCon 09, Bethesda's Todd Howard was quoted as saying the company had "no current plans" for a fifth Elder Scrolls game. According to Bethesda, that's not what Howard said at all.

The developer's Pete Hines posted a statement on the Bethesda Blog today, clarifying Howard's comments regarding the future of the Elder Scrolls series.

That was not a direct quote from him. That was someone's interpretation of what he said. I know, I was there. At his QuakeCon talk he was asked when TESV is coming out and Todd replied, "Don't look for a new Elder Scrolls game in the near future." He also went on to say how much the franchise means to us and that it definitely will continue. He just wasn't going to provide any timeframe on "when." This should not be news to anyone that has been paying attention. Both Todd and I have said repeatedly that, of course, we're going to do another Elder Scrolls game. The last one was enormously popular. So was the one before that. You get the idea. So do we.

In other words, the fate of the series isn't in question, and it shouldn't be.

Hines goes on in his post to clarify statements Howard made about an Elder Scrolls MMO, pointing out that neither Todd nor anyone on Todd's team worked on MMOs, and when the studio that does work on them - ZeniMax Online - is ready to show what they are creating, they'll show it.

I am trying to imagine an angry Pete Hines here, and it terrifies me. Just believe the man and move on before anyone gets hurt.

Clarifying About Next Elder Scrolls game, MMO, etc. [Bethesda Blog]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5339301&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[2008 Alternative Edge Awards Highlight Deficiencies In Fallout 3's Whoring]]> Edge's 2008 Alternative Edge Awards celebrate the best and worst moments in 2008 gaming from a slightly skewed perspective, driving home a point that many reviewers missed: Fallout 3's whoring sucked.

Fallout 3's award for Most Unsatisfactory Whoring is but one of myriad awards handed out by Edge this year, including Most Special Special Editions (EA), Best Flop (Boom Blox), and Wettest Hats (Brothers In Arms: Hell's Highway), but Fallout's gets me the most, simply because I was going to mention the boring whoring in my review but thought better of it.

We tried this simply out of academic interest,‭ ‬of course,‭ ‬but we hoped our solicitations might have a better payoff.‭ ‬It’s not that we need a Hot Coffee-style QTE,‭ ‬but lying fully clothed on a bed before the screen blanks and awakening,‭ ‬often with the object of your investment still wandering about the room,‭ ‬does little for us.‭ ‬At least Fable II gives a chance of contracting an STD.

I have contacted Bethesda's Pete Hines to see if we can get an explanation, and to inquire as to the possibility of a whoring patch included in future DLC.

The Alternative Edge Awards 2008 [Edge]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5120714&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Trophy Support Coming To Fallout 3 PS3]]> PlayStation 3-owning Fallout fans were a bit dismayed back in September when Bethesda's Pete Hines revealed that there were no plans to include trophy support for the game at launch, if at all. Between that and the PS3 version turning out to be the special screwed-up edition of the game, Sony owners were definitely not feeling the love, but relief is in sight! Speaking during one of Eurogamer's always informative Live Chat sessions, Hines confirmed that trophy support for the title was definitely on the way, although he didn't have an exact ETA. Considering the amount of choice available to Fallout 3 players, I wouldn't worry about having to go back through and play again..I've already completed two more games since my review last week.

While there is still no news on console fixes, the PC version will be getting a patch today to deal with some PC-specific issues. Hopefully they'll take care of the dreadful V.A.T.S. slowdown I've been experiencing on the platform. Fingers crossed.

Fallout 3 PC to get patch "later today" [Eurogamer]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076026&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bethesda Nervous About Fallout 3 Review (What's YOUR Opinion?)]]> Fallout 3 is out. People seem to like it. The game press is giving the game good reviews so far, but developer Bethesda Softworks divulges it does get nervous about what reviewers think. Says Bethesda's Pete Hines, "We're never really sure how these [reviews] will turn out. So in general, we're always nervous/anxious." Hines goes on to say that it's not just the critics who matter, but also the opinions of those gamers who are purchasing the game with their own hard earned cash. So regular gamer people who have bought Fallout 3, put on your critic cap and feel free to let all know what you think.

Bethesda: We're "Always Nervous" About Reviews [EDGE]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5070242&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fallout 3 Kicks Its Drug Habit, Thanks To Australian Intervention]]> When Australia's Office of Film and Literature Classification board refused to rate Fallout 3, it did so due to one too many drug references. Apparently, the virtual use of opiates in-game — "material promoting or encouraging proscribed drug use,” in OFLC-speak; "chems" in game speak — is frowned upon. The uptight Aussies later cleared the game for release, giving Fallout 3 an MA15+ rating, but only after Bethesda Softworks cleaned up its act.

Fallout 3 hasn't just gone cold turkey in Australia, mind you, as Bethesda's Pete Hines tells Edge that any and all references to real-world drugs have been removed — from all versions.

“I didn't want people continuing to assume the version in Australia was some altered version when it's not,” Hines tells Edge. "To avoid confusion among people in different territories, we decided to make those substitutions in all versions of the game, in all territories.”

There are "no references to real world drugs in any version of Fallout 3," ensuring that drug habits in our planet's youth will be curbed before they can ever begin.

At the very least, we appreciate Bethesda Softworks for being forthcoming. Now, to shoot up and forget this whole thing ever happened. Gotta curb these fist shakes directed at our bureaucrats down under.

Censors Force Fallout 3 Changes [Edge]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5047637&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[No PS3 Trophies For Fallout 3]]> Fans of little graphics popping up on your television telling you how good you are at the game you are currently playing are going to be a little disappointed when they pick up the PlayStation 3 version of Bethesda's eagerly-anticipated Fallout 3. In an interview with PlayStation Universe, the company's dashing Vice President of Marketing Pete Hines revealed that trophies won't be making an appearance in the game...at least not initially.

"Not at launch...It remains to be seen what we do down the road. It wasn't something we were able to incorporate into the game for launch."

Not all that surprising, considering the company's documented preference for the Xbox 360. Hopefully trophy support will be added somewhere down the line, but Pete sure doesn't come off as that enthusiastic about the idea, does he?

No trophy support for Fallout 3 at launch [PSU]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045412&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Too Much World For A Fallout 3 Demo]]> There are several reasons not to have a demo for your game in this demo-hungry period of gaming history. There are time constraints that come into play, not wanting people to know your game sucks before it comes out, and in the case of Fallout 3, just too much world to hack off a piece.

"When you build it as one thing, there's no way to portion off a section and have it stand on its own without putting the whole game in the demo, which we're just not going to do," said Hines. "And it doesn't really capture the fun of a game like an Elder Scrolls or a Fallout, where you can go where you want and do what you want. So no demo, sorry."
It's like eating a strawberry off the top of a cake. Sure, it tastes great, but there is no way you'd know how the whole cake tastes just from eating a strawberry...and what if you're allergic to strawberries? Instead of picking it off and moving on, you'd assume the whole cake has strawberries? And what if you took an analogy too far? That's when you toss out three new screens and hightail it out of there.

Fallout 3 demo not possible [Eurogamer]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382038&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fallout 3, Love It or Hate It - You Decide!]]> Expectations for the third proper Fallout game are high and Bethesda knows that. Formerly in development at the now bankrupt Interplay, the post-apocalyptic RPG rights were snapped up by the Elder Scrolls creators who acknowledge that some folks just plain ain't gonna like the direction in which they're going.

Bethesda's Pete Hines told UK mag PC Zone that, despite being Fallout fans themselves:

Not everybody is going to agree with the game we're making: it's a solid-gold lock... some folks just aren't going to give it a chance out of the box.

Wait. Gamers being fickle? Impossible! At least Hines knows that not everyone can be satisfied all the time, especially a bunch of hyper-critical RPG fans. They're an ornery bunch. Hell, even Hines took time to dig at Fallout spin-off Brotherhood of Steel. He can take and give, just like the rest of the armchair designers.

Bethesda: "Some will like Fallout 3, some will hate it" [CVG]

]]>
http://kotaku.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=247547&view=rss&microfeed=true