I don't own a wii, but I want 3 copies of this game. Not because it will be a good game (it looks like more shovelware) but because Peta told me not to. Of course, momentary whims like that dissipate when I realize it will cost me money. Oh well. #peta
PETA's qualm with the game isn't about the content (I seriously doubt they would allow you to beat elements with sticks in a game rated E) but the circus itself. PETA's saying when you buy the game, you support the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, a company they apparently have a problem with. #peta
@NeVeRMoRe666: Well, I know that. I was just basing my comment on the act that they might have a qualm with some content. Don't know what, for I have not played the game, and never plan to. #peta
@NeVeRMoRe666: Well, you aren't necessarily supporting the means of entertainment. Maybe you're just supporting the entertainment. What about those people, PETA? Huh? #peta
Aren't humans animals? Shouldn't PETA be going batshit over modern warfare 2 where the player character literally slaughters hundreds of innocent humans in transit between government zoos. #peta
You see, I had absolutely no intention of buying a Ringling Bros. (poor excuse for a) video game, for a multitude of obvious reasons. However, they have managed to rouse the ire of PETA, an organization that is far more worthy of detest and distrust.
So here is my dilemma: Do I spurn and refuse to support a pathetic time waster cash grab game, the likes of which ruin the image of legitimate and meaningful gaming? Or do I defy PETA out of principle for being a terrorist cell hell bent on forcing their ass-backwards beliefs on everyone and buy it (to collect dust on a shelf in the basement).
Anytime PETA gets brought up, witty members of society have to comment appropriately.
"I'm going to call out PETA on the negative things they have done, without even imagining the positive things. I will also only bring these things up and not mention anything I do or have done to harm animals."
What's that, you thought of clever meanings of the acronym PETA? Well aren't you just hilarious? I, nor anyone, have ever heard such funny things. The acronym YOU just explained is the exact opposite of that organization, creating a humorous event. Oh, the play on words.
Also, we can't forget the "I'm not going to buy [product PETA protests] and buy [product equally/more cruel towards animals] instead."
The treatment of Circus animals really is atrocious. It doesn't matter how you all feel about PETA. Sure they may be a bit nutty, but I still think the organization does some good. #peta
@ThisCharmingMan: plenty of good indeed....killing animals in their protection....comparing the slaughter of beef cattle for food to the Holocaust. Your definition of good must be strange, did you like Superman 64? #peta
@LordTobert: Your intake of propaganda must be healthy indeed. Peta does not kill animals. I should have known I'd be burned at the stake for saying ANYTHING positive about Peta on this website. God forbid I sympathize with the horrific treatment of circus animals. What on earth was I thinking. #peta
Nothing would cause a bigger drop in animal populations than PETA actually getting their way.
Seriously...cows would be extinct except for in India. If we aren't going to raise them for dairy and meat, what's the point in keeping them around. There aren't exactly a lot of wild cow herds that roam the grasslands in America. Chickens would largely be gone too.
Can't have cats and dogs for pets in the PETA world...its cruel. So time to set your dog Fido free...they might survive for a time in stray packs, but eventually they'd be hunted down and wiped out too once enough kids got bit by strays.
Zoos are cruel....so kill all the animals in the zoo cause there aren't enough sanctuaries in the world to take all those animals in.
Horse racing would be outlawed, so millions of thoroughbreds are no longer worth the billions their owners pay for their upkeep. All to the glue factory with 'em.
Bravo PETA, you win!! Your concern for animals rights denied millions of animals a chance to live in our cruel, little world. Bravo! #peta
In less than a month PETA will declare themselves as a winner after they see the game didn't sell. PETA then will think people actually listen to them instead of figuring out the obvious. #peta
@Neko_Tech: You know, I was wondering if PETA actually thought anyone was going to buy this game in the first place...
I'm glad someone else thought the same. #peta
11/04/09
Point 2 Why hasn't PETA said anything about WoW? You know you can kill bunnies in that game?
Point 3 It won't sell anyway unless it is an awesome remake of Big Top.
[en.wikipedia.org] #peta
11/04/09
Whose to say that the elephants didn't want to be beat. #peta
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
PETA's qualm with the game isn't about the content (I seriously doubt they would allow you to beat elements with sticks in a game rated E) but the circus itself. PETA's saying when you buy the game, you support the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, a company they apparently have a problem with. #peta
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/06/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
They're more worried about the dogs in World at War #peta
11/04/09
11/04/09
Think about it, they're actually doing something cooperative for once!
But at least we know they ain't sadomasochists! #peta
11/04/09
11/04/09
You see, I had absolutely no intention of buying a Ringling Bros. (poor excuse for a) video game, for a multitude of obvious reasons. However, they have managed to rouse the ire of PETA, an organization that is far more worthy of detest and distrust.
So here is my dilemma: Do I spurn and refuse to support a pathetic time waster cash grab game, the likes of which ruin the image of legitimate and meaningful gaming? Or do I defy PETA out of principle for being a terrorist cell hell bent on forcing their ass-backwards beliefs on everyone and buy it (to collect dust on a shelf in the basement).
Decisions... #peta
11/04/09
"I'm going to call out PETA on the negative things they have done, without even imagining the positive things. I will also only bring these things up and not mention anything I do or have done to harm animals."
What's that, you thought of clever meanings of the acronym PETA? Well aren't you just hilarious? I, nor anyone, have ever heard such funny things. The acronym YOU just explained is the exact opposite of that organization, creating a humorous event. Oh, the play on words.
Also, we can't forget the "I'm not going to buy [product PETA protests] and buy [product equally/more cruel towards animals] instead."
Such funny, original people most of you are.
edit: changed to [this]
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/06/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Sigh.
Nothing would cause a bigger drop in animal populations than PETA actually getting their way.
Seriously...cows would be extinct except for in India. If we aren't going to raise them for dairy and meat, what's the point in keeping them around. There aren't exactly a lot of wild cow herds that roam the grasslands in America. Chickens would largely be gone too.
Can't have cats and dogs for pets in the PETA world...its cruel. So time to set your dog Fido free...they might survive for a time in stray packs, but eventually they'd be hunted down and wiped out too once enough kids got bit by strays.
Zoos are cruel....so kill all the animals in the zoo cause there aren't enough sanctuaries in the world to take all those animals in.
Horse racing would be outlawed, so millions of thoroughbreds are no longer worth the billions their owners pay for their upkeep. All to the glue factory with 'em.
Bravo PETA, you win!! Your concern for animals rights denied millions of animals a chance to live in our cruel, little world. Bravo! #peta
11/04/09
11/04/09
I'm glad someone else thought the same. #peta
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09