Nevermind that in 5 minutes of Google-ing the Petric family you'll come to find that Mark, Daniel's father, is a minister of the New Life Assembly of God Church in Wellington, Ohio.
Do some research on the church and you'll discover that they are a fundamentalist organization that doesn't believe in traditional medical treatment for disease. They instead rely on prayer and faith healing.
Do some more digging and you'll find that prior to these shootings Daniel spent a year at home, away from his peers, unable to attend school due to a debilitating staph infection he got while on a snowboarding trip.
Daniel spent that year largely in bed, playing videogames, without contact from his friends or even a consultation with a doctor. Staph can be painful, and is easily treated, but because of his family's religious beliefs, he was denied treatment and spent almost a year needlessly suffering from it.
One has to ask: Do you think the duress of carrying a painful skin infection for a year in which Daniel Petric was denied medical treatment and social contact by his parents maybe have something to do with what lead him to matricide?
Also, why in the fuck does a minister keep a loaded 9mm handgun in his home and keep it within reach of his children? Was he just a big Preacher fan? I doubt it...
No, screw all that. It was the Halo he was supposedly not even allowed to play, must've been. Inanimate objects are easier to blame than people.
Don't give this 'issue' lip service without doing the diligence on the background of the story. This kid was definitely driven to murder, but by a videogame?
Personally I think the father is getting off too easy for driving his child crazy.
@stranger: Kid still shouldn't have commited murder. I'm not saying I know what life is like in conditions like that, I sure don't, but unless he was being immediately threatened he really didn't have recourse to murder, especially in a such a crazy premeditated way.
He is still responsible for his actions, regardless of the catalyst. Of course the father should be put up for reckless endangerment and/or neglect because of his innaction. Religious beliefs shouldn't be an excuse for causing pain and suffering to another unwilling human being.
This is the conversation that should be had though. It should not be about halo, because as you said, it had very little impact in this overall development.
@ankhenaten: follow up. It's not like he admitted to it, but said he was so angry at his parents for years of mistreatment. He didn't know what else to do. That maybe people would understand. It still wouldn't absolve him, but we can understand and work with that.
But, "i'm not responsible because of halo?" Heck no, that's completely ridiculous.
I just hate it when the real roots of a problem are neglected for the sake of headline grabbing soundbytes.
I wish Kotaku would do a little more of their due diligence when reporting on these tragic stories. There is a lot more to what lead to this tragedy that a videogame that was only available at retail for less than two months before the violent crime it's being blamed for occurred.
I'm sorry but I believe that people are better than that. I believe, as should we all, that people are not so weak-willed that a video game could convince them to defy nature and kill. That this child's desire to murder his parents was just boiling below the surface, and Master Chief let it loose is not something to which I could ever subscribe. It's outrageous.
The judge should be censured. There psychiatric community does not recognize an addiction to video games, and it is overstepping his limitations as a judge to suppose what cannot be medically diagnosed.
In addition, how absurd is it to grant leniency to someone because of an addiction to begin with? Has anyone ever successfully argued for leniency based on a murderer's meth habit?
If he "didn't think the deaths would be real due to his immersion in Halo 3", then there better be bloddy asscheek prints at the scene, from where he teabagged them.
After reading through the comments, I found it curious that we, the gamers, aren't defending this kid. We're the majority that is scoffing at the sentence reduction! Then again, we probably just want the death sentence because we love violence. Blah. Trials like this make me sick.
@Squaretangle: Why would gamers defend him? This just opens the door to more people like Jack Thompson who want to blame behavior on games and call for their bannination. So if we defend him, we might as well be banninating the countryside.
There's more to this story, there just has to be. Did the father speak in defense of the son? Was the child abused, or lacking mental capacity? Because as it's written here, it is clear, pre-meditated, cold blooded murder (and attempt).
@yodaddy: Charging a minor as an adult never sat well with me. If they are a minor, then they are a minor. If you want to give someone a longer sentence, change the laws for sentencing minors. You shouldn't be able to claim that someone is something they're not in a court of law and use that as the basis of the case.
I was really hoping that by lenient sentence you meant that they just threw him in the electric chair, gave him a lethal injection, flipped the switch and then turned the firing squad on him while he cooked, rather than lowering him slowly into a meat grinder like he clearly deserves.
I'm really depressed to think he will EVER see anything other than the inside of his eyelids after this incident. They should at least blind him so he can't play Halo anymore. The weird part is that i'm not generally in favor of the death penalty, much less in cruel and unusual ways but I think they should put this kid in a Hostel style room with all the assorted goodies with his dad while he avenges his wife.
@Mike Yeager: "Dad, I'm so sorry for what I did to Mom, to you and to the family," Daniel Petric said, according to his father. "I'm so glad you are alive."
"You're my son," Mark Petric responded. "You're my boy."
Obviously his father wants nothing but to avenge the life of his wife rather than hold on to what little family he has left.
"Defense lawyers argued video game obsession as a motivating factor behind the killing...that Daniel didn't think the deaths would be real due to his immersion in Halo 3"
On the bright side, when he gets out of jail and tells people why he was there, he will be ridiculed by his peers for taking Halo 3 so seriously in the same way we would if someone 23 years ago shot their parents over Pac-Man today.
@Fadecy: Rival Schools for PSN/XBLA PLZ: So you can go to jail just for watching against your will (at the lowest common denominator)? Really nice analogy you've got there...
@AnalysisDialysis (and a MudkipNDS): Did you even read that properly? A SHORTER SENTENCE FOR RAPE meaning the person has already raped somebody. And then them getting a shorter sentence because they said they'd watched Hentei. Jeez.
@Fadecy: Rival Schools for PSN/XBLA PLZ: @malfunktionv2: Oh, sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying in the first place. I understood your statement as someone being jailed for watching hentai. Instead, you meant that the person got a shorter sentence because he/she said that they were watching rape, while he/she actually raped someone in the first place. :(
Holy shit, I need some coffee.
And no, I'm not defendening hentai, malfunktionv2, I was only "confused." ;P
@AnalysisDialysis (and a MudkipNDS): We're all confused the first time, but eventually you get used to the slime and you learn to enjoy the screaming....wait what were we talking about?
This is just going to set a standard that will gradually grow more and more lenient on cases like this. It's pathetic, and it'll probably take some time to correct. That kid deserves much longer than 23 years in prison for taking his mothers life over a video game. Seriously, people, video game addiction is no different than being addicted to, say, crossword puzzles. It's a weakness of the mind, alright, but not in the sense of addiction. But hey, I guess it's the american way to push responsibility onto something else, right...?
On another note, good thing they just removed PS3's from prisons, otherwise they'd just be setting him up for failure, amirite?
06/16/09
Nevermind that in 5 minutes of Google-ing the Petric family you'll come to find that Mark, Daniel's father, is a minister of the New Life Assembly of God Church in Wellington, Ohio.
Do some research on the church and you'll discover that they are a fundamentalist organization that doesn't believe in traditional medical treatment for disease. They instead rely on prayer and faith healing.
Do some more digging and you'll find that prior to these shootings Daniel spent a year at home, away from his peers, unable to attend school due to a debilitating staph infection he got while on a snowboarding trip.
Daniel spent that year largely in bed, playing videogames, without contact from his friends or even a consultation with a doctor. Staph can be painful, and is easily treated, but because of his family's religious beliefs, he was denied treatment and spent almost a year needlessly suffering from it.
One has to ask: Do you think the duress of carrying a painful skin infection for a year in which Daniel Petric was denied medical treatment and social contact by his parents maybe have something to do with what lead him to matricide?
Also, why in the fuck does a minister keep a loaded 9mm handgun in his home and keep it within reach of his children? Was he just a big Preacher fan? I doubt it...
No, screw all that. It was the Halo he was supposedly not even allowed to play, must've been. Inanimate objects are easier to blame than people.
Don't give this 'issue' lip service without doing the diligence on the background of the story. This kid was definitely driven to murder, but by a videogame?
Personally I think the father is getting off too easy for driving his child crazy.
06/16/09
He is still responsible for his actions, regardless of the catalyst. Of course the father should be put up for reckless endangerment and/or neglect because of his innaction. Religious beliefs shouldn't be an excuse for causing pain and suffering to another unwilling human being.
This is the conversation that should be had though. It should not be about halo, because as you said, it had very little impact in this overall development.
06/16/09
But, "i'm not responsible because of halo?" Heck no, that's completely ridiculous.
06/17/09
I just hate it when the real roots of a problem are neglected for the sake of headline grabbing soundbytes.
I wish Kotaku would do a little more of their due diligence when reporting on these tragic stories. There is a lot more to what lead to this tragedy that a videogame that was only available at retail for less than two months before the violent crime it's being blamed for occurred.
06/16/09
06/16/09
In addition, how absurd is it to grant leniency to someone because of an addiction to begin with? Has anyone ever successfully argued for leniency based on a murderer's meth habit?
06/16/09
If he "didn't think the deaths would be real due to his immersion in Halo 3", then there better be bloddy asscheek prints at the scene, from where he teabagged them.
Ridiculous.
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
Don't worry, you'll only be gone for 20 years, you play games all the time.
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
Seriously, what's the benefit?
06/16/09
I'm really depressed to think he will EVER see anything other than the inside of his eyelids after this incident. They should at least blind him so he can't play Halo anymore. The weird part is that i'm not generally in favor of the death penalty, much less in cruel and unusual ways but I think they should put this kid in a Hostel style room with all the assorted goodies with his dad while he avenges his wife.
06/16/09
"You're my son," Mark Petric responded. "You're my boy."
Obviously his father wants nothing but to avenge the life of his wife rather than hold on to what little family he has left.
Calm down on the horror movies kid.
06/16/09
Some times I feel like punching babies when I hear how the justice system handles things like this badly.
23 years is nothing.
06/16/09
06/16/09
He's obviously lying.
Halo 3 isn't immersive.
06/16/09
On the bright side, when he gets out of jail and tells people why he was there, he will be ridiculed by his peers for taking Halo 3 so seriously in the same way we would if someone 23 years ago shot their parents over Pac-Man today.
06/16/09
06/16/09
/sarcasm
06/16/09
06/16/09
06/16/09
Holy shit, I need some coffee.
And no, I'm not defendening hentai, malfunktionv2, I was only "confused." ;P
06/16/09
06/16/09
On another note, good thing they just removed PS3's from prisons, otherwise they'd just be setting him up for failure, amirite?
06/16/09