Kotaku 
Enter your username and password.
Denver, 6:17 PM
Wed Dec 16
61 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip us:
Editor-In-Chief:
Brian Crecente
| AIM | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Stephen Totilo
| AIM | Twitter
Senior Editor:
Michael McWhertor
| AIM | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor, Japan:
Brian Ashcraft
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, East Coast:
Michael Fahey
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Oceania:
Luke Plunkett
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Weekends:
Owen Good
| AIM | Twitter
Correspondent, San Francisco:
AJ Glasser
| AIM | Twitter
Columnist:
Leigh Alexander
Columnist:
Tim Rogers
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
12/15/09
First - a top down look at a map with enemies and resources laid out on it. Including structures where you can purchase new units. This is very Heroes relative.
Second - while the puzzle game format may be new to the series, I believe the overall point is still there in essence. (That being, build armies, attack enemy with stronger army than he has, win fight.)
Finally - The lore in this game is more than relevant to call it a Might and Magic game. The factions are those that one would find in a Heroes game. The units are those that one would find for those specific factions in a Heroes game. In fact some units even share the same abilities as those of their Heroes counterparts (Vampires transfer health, dragons breath in rows of damage, genies can freeze enemies). While they have been shrunk and details removed they remain true to the style of Heroes, even if their use or activation varies.
I'm more than satisfied in calling this game Might and Magic, as it takes me once again into battle against the demons of Sheogh.
(Admittedly, I miss my 3 stacks of titans and 2 stacks of black dragons wrecking face, but with no sign of a Heroes VI on the horizon I'll take what I can get you know?)
12/15/09
My biggest problem by far is the lack of scenario play.
Either I am stupid or there are only the campaign and single battle (no map, just a battle where you decide opponent and your own character, not too exciting). I'll allow its like that in most prpg games and I shouldn't compare this to homm but that's what they get for associating with that franchise.
Another thing that is annoying is the lack of info on the troops, many times when I met opponents I didn't know which was the biggest, baddest and who was the little brother. Only that the strong ones have an activation cost of 4 cannon fodders and the middle troops need 2 dito to activate.
But, enough whining, it's together with Puzzle Quest, the definitive prpg in my world. I can't vouche for the longevity of this but at 15 hours I barely feel like I've begun, still at the second scenario.
Get it if you're a fan of the genre!
12/15/09
12/15/09
I've played alot of the might and magic games (my favorite being heroes of might and magic 3 +4) I'd definitely say it's more like a jap console rpg than the rest of the M&M games, it's through and through a strategy/puzzle game.
it definitely has balancing issues... which are most easily recognizable when you play multiplayer. which means.. you really have to take into account who you're playing against when you pick your hero.
all in all, my husband and I are addicted to it at the moment.
We had played puzzlequest when it came out. He broke the system and OWNED that game.. Me? well I can't see 20 moves ahead of me to know if I'm getting the most out of each jewel movement. Clash of heroes is not frustrating in that way.
12/15/09
Another major issue is the lack of levels on the quests, areas, or enemies. You can access level 5 enemies on the map despite being level 2 (which is a pretty huge disadvantage), and not having to retreat and reload the game every time I meet a new side-quest enemy would be handy.
The final problem would be the luck of the draw. Having your huge four-square units land on top (well...technically the "bottom," since your units fall up) of a stack makes for all kinds of headaches, and makes you liable to lose them and unable to do anything about it, wasting valuable turns just to line up everything.
If these aren't too big a deal to you, I'd definitely recommend this game. Watching your units decimate the enemy lines or figuring out the trick to each puzzle fight is very satisfying.
12/15/09
07/13/09
07/13/09
It's nice to have a woman's review of games, and she seems to review a wider variety of genres than the boys do.
(Like the Rabbids shirt; the thong, not so much)
07/07/09
07/07/09
Hence why I didn't touch Generation of Chaos after the initial bubble of interest burst, because I realized I spent hours upon hours on maximizing my army during each battle.
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
07/07/09
05/13/09
Puzzle RPG?
WTF?
05/13/09
05/13/09
Oh yeah, i forgot the profits of using a well-known name, even if the game is totally unrelated.
05/13/09
"Oh yeah, i forgot the profits of using a well-known name, even if the game is totally unrelated."
I appreciate your stream-of-consciousness post. Very Faulkner. However, once the self-realization point in your narrative is reached, it behooves you to not hit "submit."