So when the Eagles are in the redzone and they need a power back to break through the line to get that 1 or two yards for the ID, who do they turn to? McNabb? The QB? Give me a break. You sure as hell can't depend on Westbrook as the go to guy. Give me a power back like Bettis and have Westbrook as a complement and then you got a serious running game.

 Reply

Also though, we need to have some running plays for McNabb. In the past people weren't only worried about Westbrook running out, they also had to worry about McNabb running too. He sometimes runs out this year but usually he hesitates a little bit before he does. They need specific plays for that.

Eagles need to keep McNabb, he isn't to blame for that loss Sunday. Receivers were at fault this time not holding on to the ball. Reid though? If he calling plays like he was Sunday he needs to go.

Lets hope to knock the Cowboys out of the playoff hunt though!

 Reply

I have to disagree with McNabb not leaving though. McNabb is a good QB that will get you wins. He is not a great QB that will win you a Super Bowl. He proved it when the Eagles lost to the Patriots in the big game. Let's look at the details. Love him or hate him, TO is still one of the best receivers in the league. How do you NOT throw him the ball in the second half of the Super Bowl? Especially when the corner that was covering TO had to leave the game and was replaced with a rookie.

Not to mention the overthrown and underthrown passes, the bad reads of defenses..McNabb has been too inconsistent to be considered a great QB. When he was in the Pro Bowl with TO the season before the Eagles picked up the receiver, McNabb STILL couldn't get into the flow of the game. That was with a pro bowl offensive line. It didn't help that Andy Reid was McNabb's coach for that game.

Ok, I'm done...end rant :)

 Reply

Since when do you have to have a great QB to win a Super Bowl? Sure it greatly increases your odds, but McNabb is definitely better than some QBs who have won in the past. And the Eagles were outmatched in that game, if it weren't for TO it wouldn't have been nearly as close.

 Reply

Or maybe Palin needs to fly a gunship and shoot up some wolves and Chinese. Eh, it's all good, right?

 Reply

As gamers, it's our duty to respond to free DLC with "it sucks". Any free DLC.

Accordingly, if DLC is fee-based our response must be unwaveringly "shoulda been included with the game in the first place".

As long we stick to the above rules, game companies will finally appreciate us for what we are.

 Reply

As well as the plethora of Burnout Paradise content.

This isn't as bad as if it were charged, but the only reason they aren't charging for it is because it's way past prime.

 Reply