@Stix1313: Get a low key visualizer on there, use calming colours, set up a playlist of her favorite tunes complementing the moment ranging from the foreplay to getting into it and you bet your sweet bippy it'd be awesome for sex.
Beats the losers that I've seen with mirrors on the ceiling.
LOL, that statement is too true. But who am I kidding, I had one in Jr. High and I thought I was sooo cool. But I prefer the term geek to nerd thank you. :)
I've always associated the term geek to be more along the lines of an enthusiast. I heard a comedian once point out thatthe difference between a nerd and a geek was the fact a geek was still able to get laid and the nerd was SOL. I tend to use that line myself as of late.
@Eric Hecht: so are you getting a blowjob on top of the steak? is she eating a steak while giving you a blowjob through the ring where the T-bone was? are are one of you giving the steak a blowjob? i dont know how steak+blowjob fit together! it's utterly illogical!!! *head blows up*
So he claims Blu-Ray fails under the "Worst" tech category because the media is expensive, but praises a $800 cell phone? Well I've come under conclusion that this man's head seems to be only good for holding hats.
Blu Ray would show promise if the sales scheme reflected DVDs and VHSs, in that they had to lower down the price of the media to attract buyers.
I believe that despite what "the experts" say, there will always be a percentage of people in decent to great numbers that insist on having a hard copy of said media. but even then people in this economy will have to question if they want to pay the extra 15 dollars (This is gathered from walking into the local Best Buy, Walmart, Fye and Target stores today, btw.) for HD resolution, or if they are fine with standard definition of the DVD.
I like Blu-Ray myself. but I also know that I personally wouldn't break down in tears if I were to find out that the next movie I watched were in DVD's MPEG-2 format, either.
And I'll also admit that I am not entirely sold on Blu-Ray either. Being that I want the movie first and foremost, and can't see too much a difference between the cinema projections (or in some cases, digital broadcasts, now.) and the DVD quality, it is safe to say that unless there are exceptional differences (Night At The Museum, anyone?), I am far less likely to pay the extra fifteen dollars.
Sadly, because of the grab-ass-ery that goes on at the "thinktanking" at Sony Corporation (Wait, can I put that in the same sentence?), you are probably not going to see price reductions to Blu-Ray discs that would make it a more attractive alternative and/or replacement to the DVD. With the constant pigheadedness that I believe we are watching Sony Corp dishing out with their medicore product lines, the high amount of bullshit propietary (and often failed) mediums offered, and arguably arrogant stance given by company execs who feel the need to feebly attempt elitism within their mediocrity, I am not suprised if the Blu-Ray disc goes the way of the BetaMax.
Some of us were thinking this. I felt the need to say it.
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
the thing with Blu-Ray is sure it has a better picture and sound,but its nowhere near the leap in technology that we had with VHS to DVD...and with Blu-Ray costing a lot more than DVD,i am still more than happy to stick to my DVDs,the picture on DVDs are fine
@metallicorphan: ALOT more is stretching it. I got The Dark Knight for 22 dollars, iron man 22 dollars, transformers 25 dollars. DVD's 19.99 somplaces but mostly 25 dollars.
@dillinger23: The standard edition DVD of The Dark Knight is roughly $15-19 depending on the sale. Transformers can now be found for anywhere from $5-10.
If you compare the super awesome deluxe DVD version to the standard BD version then yeah...it's a bit closer.
He's talking about Blu-Ray as a whole data format, not just for games. Blu_Ray is slow, slow, slow. That's why the PS3 needs all the mandatory installs. Otherwise the loading times would be catastrophic.
It holds data well - lots of it - hence it's great for movies, where the data unspools slowly and steadily over a long period of time, but it's not great for games where you want large bursts of data quickly.
There are advantages, but unless you own the tech that you are pushing, there's no real reason for the expense associated with switching to the format across the board.
@Horusz: Comes down to personal opinion doesn't it? And personally, I think it's more than a "slightly" better experience and well worth what we spent.
People have absolutely no attention span anymore. "What? Blu Ray doesn't have the entire 100,000+ catalog that DVD has developed over ten years? Why, it's obviously destined to fail!"
It's been out for two years, one and a half of which it was battling with a rival for share of the market, and it has the dubious distinction of vying for widespread adoption in one of the worst economic recessions in memory. I can only assume that the doomsayers for the format either weren't alive, or weren't paying attention, when CDs and DVDs first broke, they were expensive, limitedly used, and had a small catalog too.
@Horusz: Digital distribution is a long way off and personally, when it does come around I doubt it will be the alternative to physical media. Physical media will always be around.
08/02/09
08/02/09
Beats the losers that I've seen with mirrors on the ceiling.
08/02/09
08/02/09
Plus tax.
08/02/09
08/02/09
08/03/09
08/02/09
'Any last regrets?'
'...I never quite finished Lost Odyssey'
06/16/09
06/16/09
...milk.
06/16/09
you know you're perverted when...
03/14/09
03/14/09
03/14/09
In context:
God, that woman's voice makes me cringe.
03/14/09
03/14/09
LOL, that statement is too true. But who am I kidding, I had one in Jr. High and I thought I was sooo cool. But I prefer the term geek to nerd thank you. :)
I've always associated the term geek to be more along the lines of an enthusiast. I heard a comedian once point out thatthe difference between a nerd and a geek was the fact a geek was still able to get laid and the nerd was SOL. I tend to use that line myself as of late.
By the way I'm not implying anything.
03/14/09
03/14/09
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
I believe that despite what "the experts" say, there will always be a percentage of people in decent to great numbers that insist on having a hard copy of said media. but even then people in this economy will have to question if they want to pay the extra 15 dollars (This is gathered from walking into the local Best Buy, Walmart, Fye and Target stores today, btw.) for HD resolution, or if they are fine with standard definition of the DVD.
I like Blu-Ray myself. but I also know that I personally wouldn't break down in tears if I were to find out that the next movie I watched were in DVD's MPEG-2 format, either.
And I'll also admit that I am not entirely sold on Blu-Ray either. Being that I want the movie first and foremost, and can't see too much a difference between the cinema projections (or in some cases, digital broadcasts, now.) and the DVD quality, it is safe to say that unless there are exceptional differences (Night At The Museum, anyone?), I am far less likely to pay the extra fifteen dollars.
Sadly, because of the grab-ass-ery that goes on at the "thinktanking" at Sony Corporation (Wait, can I put that in the same sentence?), you are probably not going to see price reductions to Blu-Ray discs that would make it a more attractive alternative and/or replacement to the DVD. With the constant pigheadedness that I believe we are watching Sony Corp dishing out with their medicore product lines, the high amount of bullshit propietary (and often failed) mediums offered, and arguably arrogant stance given by company execs who feel the need to feebly attempt elitism within their mediocrity, I am not suprised if the Blu-Ray disc goes the way of the BetaMax.
Some of us were thinking this. I felt the need to say it.
Well, that, and FIRE STRINGER NOW!!!
12/18/08
google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yahoo
12/18/08
If they were, I'd have seen it in the Investor Relations postings.
That, or the Bloomberg Report.
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
If you compare the super awesome deluxe DVD version to the standard BD version then yeah...it's a bit closer.
12/18/08
It holds data well - lots of it - hence it's great for movies, where the data unspools slowly and steadily over a long period of time, but it's not great for games where you want large bursts of data quickly.
There are advantages, but unless you own the tech that you are pushing, there's no real reason for the expense associated with switching to the format across the board.
12/18/08
I've done DMC4...Burnout needed one I think...
..And my downloaded games maybe?
There's not that many mandatory installs. And the ones that don't call for it work just fine to me.
12/18/08
And the question is, is it worth all that money for a slightly better experience?
12/18/08
12/18/08
bluray will eventually take off. Sure its pricey but its new.
and a lot of older movies are coming out in Bluray. goes to show where the industry wants to take the format.
Laptops are already coming with Bluray burners.
12/18/08
People have absolutely no attention span anymore. "What? Blu Ray doesn't have the entire 100,000+ catalog that DVD has developed over ten years? Why, it's obviously destined to fail!"
It's been out for two years, one and a half of which it was battling with a rival for share of the market, and it has the dubious distinction of vying for widespread adoption in one of the worst economic recessions in memory. I can only assume that the doomsayers for the format either weren't alive, or weren't paying attention, when CDs and DVDs first broke, they were expensive, limitedly used, and had a small catalog too.
12/18/08
Meh, I still think blu-ray will be overshadowed by digital distribution in the coming years.
12/18/08