Kotaku 
Enter your username and password.
Denver, 3:21 AM
Tue Dec 1
64 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip us:
Editor-In-Chief:
Brian Crecente
| AIM | Twitter
Deputy Editor:
Stephen Totilo
| AIM | Twitter
Senior Editor:
Michael McWhertor
| AIM | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editor, Japan:
Brian Ashcraft
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, East Coast:
Michael Fahey
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Oceania:
Luke Plunkett
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editor, Weekends:
Owen Good
| AIM | Twitter
Correspondent, San Francisco:
AJ Glasser
| AIM | Twitter
Columnist:
Leigh Alexander
Columnist:
Tim Rogers
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
01/05/09
i hardly think girls who want to lose weight should be one-stop-shopping for a magazine that airbrushes the living fuck out of its already skinny, glamorous-than-thou models. GameStop, shame on you.
01/05/09
01/05/09
Well at least you can buy games and pretend you were buying 'em to give the magazines to her.
That Cosmo and their temptress schemes! 101 ways to wrap him around your finger without him knowing!
01/05/09
01/05/09
You and your manager must not have a high volume store.
We see a lot of women every day. This program has been a big hit for us already. Offering them these magazine subscriptions is about the same as offering all your male customers Maxim subscriptions when buying action games. Would it be stupid then?
01/05/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
Not really all that different, though. Seems like both men's and women's magazine both feature scantily clad women prominently.
01/05/09
01/05/09
01/05/09
BUT, a better question is... are we far enough past the women's right movement that men can now be liberated and have a magazine about sex (think GQ, but with SEX all over the cover, talking about milking a woman's glands) in grocery store aisles, or do we still have to feel like pervs buying them in some dirty 'NEWS" store, or online?
01/05/09
But if by "prove me wrong" you actually mean to simply show you a Cosmo cover that does not feature "sex" - here ya go: [upload.wikimedia.org]
01/05/09
Pshh. That one is obviously a fake!
The spelled illustrated, 'illvstrated.' :P
01/05/09
I dunno, Bend Low and Hark sounds mighty suggestive to me. ;P
01/05/09
No.
01/05/09
01/05/09
Yr nw dsgn s rndrd bslt by ggl nws! dnt wnt lts f smll bdly wrttn rtcls tht r 50% cpy pstd frm thr sts. Ppl r lvng yr st WK TH FCK P ND STP FCKNG R SN GF's, THR NT WRTH T ( tn yr ld by wll sffc!). Srsly prfr gng t jystq nw, gys fx r st! y cn gngbng m ll y wnt nd prm bn m bt m spkng frm th hrt tls!
01/05/09
And, honestly, if you don't like it
01/05/09
Well said.
01/05/09
I can't be the only person who still thinks it's funny when trolls like this have no friends on their profile, right? Right?!?!?! *cries in a corner*
01/05/09
01/05/09
12/23/08
"So What?"
"Who Cares?"
Let's assume the survey is right and 90% of the three women that play Everquest 2 are bi. What does this mean for me? Or you? What does this mean for the average Everquest user? Do these women, because they're bi, just go around handing out their addresses and phone numbers for "social experimentation"? What conclusions can be drawn from knowing bisexual women play Everquest 2? Or even that that personality of women play MMOs in general?
More MMOs should cater to the bisexual crowd? We need gender-neutral avatars and virtual-sex areas? I really just don't understand the point of a survey like that at all.
And assume the survey is wrong and inacurate. Will that stop me from playing World of Warcraft as a female avatar to get more free stuff? No. Will that stop hordes of women from claiming to be bi to get more free stuff? No. Will that convince men that they have absolutely no chance of getting with these women or at least catching them on a webcam? No.
So, basically, the result of this survey is... nothing. We've learned nothing, we've gained nothing, and nothing changes as a result. Hooray!
12/23/08
Research grants.
Get research grant at Uni, stretch it out as long as you can and it's that much longer before you have to go work in the real world where they expect useful results.
Give it a fancy title like "Socioeconomic and psychosexual segregation in virtual multiuser worlds" and give results like the above padded with redundant BS.
Bam, one more year of relative freedom and another entry on your resume.
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
What does that mean, actually? Does it somehow exist bisexuals in the MMIRPG-worlds that don't exist in the real world?
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
Are they bisexual in the sphere of an MMO (where you can be anything you want) or are these true bisexuals who can have or had relationships with both genders offline?
Or did they just say it because it would burn them through the survey faster? From what I have read and understood true bisexuals are kinda rare. There are a lot of people at younger ages who sexually experiment, but that's not being bisexual.
Something's not right about this survey. To capture that much of a social-sexual rarity in one place means it's a social phenomenon or the numbers are screwy.
12/23/08
Giving someone a kiss is not the same as having sex with them after all.
So yes, it is interesting. It makes you wonder how many of them are genuinely bisexual or not just experimenting/wanting to fit in etc,
12/23/08
o_O
12/23/08
"Of the five women I know in real life"
lol says it all
12/23/08
12/23/08
12/23/08
No seriously, think about it! Get people thinking that there are a ton of bisexual women in Everquest. This potentially draws more stereotypical MMO players to hopefully talk with a woman...and potentially draws actual bisexual women to Everquest...
BRILLIANT!
12/23/08
12/23/08