I never played Bad Company but always wanted to try it. I've enjoyed the Battlefield series so I'm sure it's great. Scammers are so annoying. #battlefieldbadcompany2
@Akihiko: its fantastic,their game engine was shown off in a great way by the game, and then it was upgraded a hell of alot in 1943, and from videos, the engine is even more advanced in bc2. cant wait #battlefieldbadcompany2
@ToastyUterus: Quite simply the first one was a Joy to play in multiplayer.
Say you wanted to get to Gold Cache A. Gold Cache A is within Building B. The Only Entrance to Building B is being guarded by Team C. Team C are not your friends, and will shoot you on sight. What do you do? Why! You burst open a wall with a rocket or demo pack and make a new door into Building B.
@Vecha: Monday 3pmEST Kotaku Bioware: I don't know, but I haven't heard of this happening with any other game, that's what I meant with my question. #battlefieldbadcompany2
It's just like GTA 3, Vice City, and San Andreas. It's not GTA 3, 4, and 5. It's GTA 3, Vice City, and San Andreas. Then 4. If we go by the logic of what some people in here is talking about, then Feb. 19 is the release date of Street Fighter, like, 22 or something.
@ChalkdustTorture: And for the record, the reason why this point matters is because this email going around is offering a beta for a game that does not exist. So obviously it's a scam! Ta-da.
Thanks for posting Owen. There are a few dead giveaways that it's a fake.
1. COD5 doesn't exist. There's no game out or coming out that has that title.
2. It links to Charlieoscardelta.com, which is no longer active.
Basically it's an exact replica of the COD4 beta invite I sent out during that beta, just with replacing COD4 with COD5 references. Lame phishing or virus ploy.
@gunluva: agreed. There's loads more weapons they didn't include. The machine gun, sniper rifle and shotgun classes are an area that really need expanding.
I'm pretty sure only the ones made my infinity ward should be numbered, because they are the only ones that are worth a damn. I'm looking at you COD3 and WAW.
@moosknuckle37: I was just on my way to reiterate this point. Glad I found your post first. Infinity Ward makes COD's deserving of actual numbers in the series. Treyarch develops their spin-offs and cash-ins. I'm another among those who get irked when people call World at War COD5. They (Treyarch) had their shot with COD3 and good lord, I won't touch World at War simply because of my experience with the former. I came over from the PC, and was sorely disappointed. A lot of my friends like the new Call of Duty, and I understand it does things better than Treyarch's last attempt, most likely due to the utilization of the COD4 engine.
By all means, everyone please enjoy World at War all you want. I can't say whether it's good or bad because I'll never play it, but please stop stepping on all the purists toes. :P
@moosknuckle37: @Squaretangle: You're not alone. I've tried my best to like WaW but it's just pales in comparison to IW's games. I hope Treyarch can one day change my mind though.
I could see a lot of people falling for this. Wouldn't it be great if it turned out it was actually the COD5 beta and IW are trying to keep a lid on a leak.
Also for the record, who really gives a shit other than IW if COD:WAW is referred to as COD5.
@TheHallowHero: The link system doesn't seem to like the last bracket. Add that and you get the page. Read the article.
Thanks for calling me a gaming god, btw. I never considered myself one but it's nice to be called one. Has a nice ring to it: MasterDex - Gaming God. Might get it engraved on my tombstone. :P
@Kymeira: Comprehension is just as important, I agree. My comprehension of it is that there are 5 games in the main COD series. There is a portable title seperate from the main series and there are ports related to the main series as well as an expansion for the first game in the series.
My point in posting the wiki article was to show that the people who equate COD:WaW to be the same as COD5 weren't completely wrong.
WaW is NOT COD5. The only reason you are calling it '5' is because it was released after '4'. By that logic, GTA4 would be GTA11. Stop fucking calling it that. Put down the controller, learn some basic math, and count all the previous installments before your beloved COD4. I'm tired of having to address this shit on the interweb and I'm going to e-slap you if you keep it up.
@simi510: That's what I was thinking. It's plausible if you consider the amount of leaks the industry has. It might also be that it was a private beta supposed to be sent to a select few but someone buggered it and sent it to everyone.
@-MasterDex-: I assure you. Thats not the case. This is fake. Not sure if it's phishing or a virus, but it's not real.
Trust me, I'm the one who personally sends out this stuff. It's an exact replica of the COD4 beta email I wrote when we did 4's, except they replaced all reference of COD4 with COD5.
if you want to get REALLY technical, CoD:WAW is like CoD9, cause if you want to count each one thats not given a number as a numbered one, you'd have to include big red one, finest hour, and roads to victory
@Rokashi: If you ask me, the only reason they didn't call it COD 5 was because Modern Warfare was still selling pretty well, and they didn't want to interfere with the cash flowing in by releasing a game with a greater numerical next to its title.
@Chanaluss: Actually, if you REALLY want to get technical, then there's something like two COD 1 ( PC version and Finest hour) then there's two COD 2 (PC Version and Big Red One).
Then for some reason COD 3 doesn't make it to PC, so the two 'series' gets merged at this point since afterwards every title went multiplat.
Modern Warfare is obviously COD 4.
Logic tells me that WAW is COD 5.
Not that it really matters to me either way. But while I don't think there'll be a numerical to Modern Warfare II, I think it would be ridiculous for the next numbered entry to be COD 5 afterwards. They probably should just ditch the numerals altogether and give them all nice little subtitles.
@Fieldy: Logic be damned! Infinity Ward nor Activision ever called it CoD5 so it isn't! Honestly I remember bitching about this when everyone in the blogosphere called it CoD5... nobody listens to the pretentious nerd :(
11/01/09
I never played Bad Company but always wanted to try it. I've enjoyed the Battlefield series so I'm sure it's great. Scammers are so annoying. #battlefieldbadcompany2
11/01/09
11/02/09
Say you wanted to get to Gold Cache A. Gold Cache A is within Building B. The Only Entrance to Building B is being guarded by Team C. Team C are not your friends, and will shoot you on sight. What do you do? Why! You burst open a wall with a rocket or demo pack and make a new door into Building B.
Or use a tank. #battlefieldbadcompany2
11/01/09
11/01/09
Are there many fans in the series?
I know I enjoyed the game...
sure not as popular as other BF games or COD 4/MW1/2... #battlefieldbadcompany2
11/01/09
11/01/09
I've heard of it with a few games...
last time I think it was with Killzone 2?
Not sure...
I'm sure it happens quite a bit...probably people just ignore it. #battlefieldbadcompany2
11/01/09
11/01/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
It would be more in the neighborhood of ten, but I see your point.
Activision's naming stratagem is stupid, end of discussion.
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/12/09
01/11/09
1. COD5 doesn't exist. There's no game out or coming out that has that title.
2. It links to Charlieoscardelta.com, which is no longer active.
Basically it's an exact replica of the COD4 beta invite I sent out during that beta, just with replacing COD4 with COD5 references. Lame phishing or virus ploy.
Screenshot of email:
www.tinyurl.com/fakecod5beta
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
By all means, everyone please enjoy World at War all you want. I can't say whether it's good or bad because I'll never play it, but please stop stepping on all the purists toes. :P
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
Also for the record, who really gives a shit other than IW if COD:WAW is referred to as COD5.
01/11/09
01/11/09
No it's not. Please know what you are talking about before you post. ty.
there are about 8 call of duties.
01/11/09
Please know what you're talking about before you post. ty
01/11/09
Oh really how many are out then oh gaming god. There is no official CoD5 only a couple misinformed people thinking WaW is CoD 5.
BTW your link doesn't go to anything specific. Just a failed search at wiki.
01/11/09
Thanks for calling me a gaming god, btw. I never considered myself one but it's nice to be called one. Has a nice ring to it: MasterDex - Gaming God. Might get it engraved on my tombstone. :P
01/11/09
Comprehension is just as important as reading.
01/11/09
My point in posting the wiki article was to show that the people who equate COD:WaW to be the same as COD5 weren't completely wrong.
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
Trust me, I'm the one who personally sends out this stuff. It's an exact replica of the COD4 beta email I wrote when we did 4's, except they replaced all reference of COD4 with COD5.
01/11/09
It's nice to throw around conspiracies now and again though, gets the fanboys worked up, that's never boring.
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
COD:WAW is what just came out, not COD 5, nobody calls it COD 5
01/11/09
01/11/09
if you want to get REALLY technical, CoD:WAW is like CoD9, cause if you want to count each one thats not given a number as a numbered one, you'd have to include big red one, finest hour, and roads to victory
01/11/09
01/11/09
@Chanaluss: Actually, if you REALLY want to get technical, then there's something like two COD 1 ( PC version and Finest hour) then there's two COD 2 (PC Version and Big Red One).
Then for some reason COD 3 doesn't make it to PC, so the two 'series' gets merged at this point since afterwards every title went multiplat.
Modern Warfare is obviously COD 4.
Logic tells me that WAW is COD 5.
Not that it really matters to me either way. But while I don't think there'll be a numerical to Modern Warfare II, I think it would be ridiculous for the next numbered entry to be COD 5 afterwards. They probably should just ditch the numerals altogether and give them all nice little subtitles.
01/11/09
01/12/09