The animations seem a bit stiff in the trailer I saw, especially compared to the smoothness of SoT. If a pre-rendered trailer on a next-gen system can't match the ones on my freaking Gamecube...
Maybe they can make the Prince fall asleep at the end of "Forgotten Sands", and then make another game next year (set between WW and TTT) in which the Prince wakes up from a shallow, frustrating, tedious nightmare.
I don't know what to think of this game. Personally I enjoyed the last Prince of Persia game and would love to see it continue. Yet now we are receiving a game that goes back to a concluded storyline from the last generation in which the Prince had a brother who had his own kingdom in trouble?
Somehow I feel like this is the movie game in disguise, that it's suppose to tie-in to the last storyline, which is suppose to be the plot of the movie trilogy. The font they use for the pre-order case has the same Bold Arial that you see on the movie posters, and I can't help and feel like there is a connection.
After all, the first movie is The Sands of Time and the movie is debuting in May 28, 2010. When is this game coming out?
They have already announced that the release of this game is intended to coincide with the movie release. You aren't in anyway wrong, they just aren't trying to hide it. They've only gone back to the previous timeline because of the movie. And in terms of business it makes perfect sense. Even if they don't share a plot; the movie and game will both provide marketing for each other.
@Atomsk88: IGN: Does the game tie into the movie in any way?
Michael McIntyre: The Forgotten Sands is a new chapter in our own universe, which we created with the original Sands of Time. The Forgotten Sands is another chapter in the SOT series, and is not tied to the movie in any way (other than being set in the same overall universe). We're extremely excited that, thanks to the movie, so many people are going to be exposed to this world which we love, and that such top-caliber talent is associated with it.
@Eseph: True, but at the same time it appears to me as though Ubisoft is trying to tip-toe its way around stating that, yes, this is a movie game. Pretty much every gamer knows the reputation movie games have, and so by relating this new game with a beloved story arc of the Prince of Persia series, it's giving Ubisoft a chance to at least get this game on shelves and peak interest. Problem is, it's peaking interest and letting on misguided connotations.
It may not directly tie to the movie, but it's still a game with the intention to relate to the movie. Next thing you know, they'll have another pre-sequel for Warrior Within and Two Thrones.
@dreamfall: Alright, but now I wonder why Ubi couldn't have been satisfied with the trilogy for what it is and left all the games of the arc alone for people who are interested to seek and play.
Was it necessary to make an entirely new game to be placed in a secondary position to provide some starting point to newcomers?
@Atomsk88: It's pretty simple. It's not a movie game, but they are capitalizing on the movie release by having a game with the same overall theme. Making the second entry in the new PoP wouldn't make sense if it had NOTHING to do with the movie, so they are revisiting the old locales to confuse unknowing buyers into purchasing their title.
@POWRDUPshawn: Nah, I understand why they're doing it, but at the same time you have to wonder if making an entirely new game was the correct method to bring people, and their money, into the SoT trilogy.
I know a sequel to the 2008 game wouldn't make sense, but quite frankly I want to at least hear something about there being a sequel instead of a cash-in for May 2010.
@GohanGVO: I didn't know, but I'm really glad that I saw that. It looks really great, and I'll have to keep my eye on that game. What a great, trippy mechanic.
I really like the amount of stylized puzzle-platforming that seems to be coming to wiiware. Seems to be keeping within the Wii's rep as the retro console, and yet still keeping it somewhat fresh
I liked Sands of Time and Two Thrones a lot more than Prince of Nathan Drake, myself, so I'm not as burned up about this as everybody else seems to be.
We'll see how it turns out, but I probably won't play it because I'll likely still be working on FFXIII and Yakuza 3 when it comes out.
@Archaotic: the only PoP game i have ever played was the last one and i want to see the story continue (yes i bought the DLC). the old ones never got attention plus IMO the graphics were crap.
@shaunmcilroy: nope. look i personally didn't like the games i am not discrediting them at all. hell with those i would not have got the last PoP. i just would rather the new PoP than the older ones (talking characters and story)
@Ezhno: So if you see a game, and the graphics aren't good you just don't play it?
That's a pretty retarded way of thinking, some of the best games ever didn't have good graphics for its time, it is correct for me to asume that you are the kind of person that would play a shitty game if it comes in HD?
Plus, in 2003 when sands of time was released, the graphics were pretty amazing.
@Ezhno: the SoT trilogy had talking characters and story. The voice acting was actually well done; well enough that people were upset when they changed the Prince's VA in Warrior Within, so they brought him back for Two Thrones.
There have been 3 "sets" of Prince:
Prince of Persia, PoP2: Sword and the Flame ?, PoP 3D.
Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, Warrior Within, Two Thrones
Prince of Persia (reboot, next gen title).
The Sands of Time's story line is actually a great deal more complicated than the reboot's. With all the time travel, hoping around between games, 7 year gap in between game 1 and 2, and creating alternate timelines, it was a bit tricky to keep track of.
@2pado: no far from the truth hell i can still to this day play the first Megaman Legends (nowhere near HD or PS2) and love it. but at that time all the gametrailer/gameplay never intrested me. and i have rented them (well the first one) and tryed but just didn't catch on. hell i never like the Ratch and clank but just like PoP i give the studio all kinds of credit cause i would not have gotten a game like Resistance or uncharted from Naughty dog (god i hated Crash) or Infamous from the sly developer (hated sly also) even though those great games just didn't like them.
Maybe not a memory wipe, but perhaps whatever power he gains is only temporary. But think about it. This is a game about time control/travel. There's no reason the storyline couldn't involve him moving forward in time from Sands of Time, then having to go back in time to where Warrior Within would have started.
Actually theres a lot more then I expected here, NMH 2 is a must buy, as is Endless Ocean 2 plus Crystal Bearers (in europe!) as is TATSUNOKO VS. CAPCOM: ULTIMATE ALL-STARS!!!!! and Red Steel 2 and Monkey Ball which I'm praying turns out great.
Hold on WarioWare D.I.Y?? Sounds too good to be true!
Or, at least that's what I'm hoping. I really really really want Zelda for 2010. Since they're showing it at E3 2010, I think the longest we'll have to wait is Spring 2011.
12/14/09
Last I checked, the rule stating that adding the word "boss" to the end of anything will automatically make it rad is still unchallenged.
DSi Boss.
DSi BOSS.
See, I'm just so goddamned overwhelmed right now.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Worth checking out if you want somethign to relax to.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Somehow I feel like this is the movie game in disguise, that it's suppose to tie-in to the last storyline, which is suppose to be the plot of the movie trilogy. The font they use for the pre-order case has the same Bold Arial that you see on the movie posters, and I can't help and feel like there is a connection.
After all, the first movie is The Sands of Time and the movie is debuting in May 28, 2010. When is this game coming out?
May 2010
12/14/09
They have already announced that the release of this game is intended to coincide with the movie release. You aren't in anyway wrong, they just aren't trying to hide it. They've only gone back to the previous timeline because of the movie. And in terms of business it makes perfect sense. Even if they don't share a plot; the movie and game will both provide marketing for each other.
12/14/09
Michael McIntyre: The Forgotten Sands is a new chapter in our own universe, which we created with the original Sands of Time. The Forgotten Sands is another chapter in the SOT series, and is not tied to the movie in any way (other than being set in the same overall universe). We're extremely excited that, thanks to the movie, so many people are going to be exposed to this world which we love, and that such top-caliber talent is associated with it.
[xbox360.ign.com]
there's an interview that explains that it's not related to the movie- still, I did like the direction they took the new prince with Elika.
12/14/09
It may not directly tie to the movie, but it's still a game with the intention to relate to the movie. Next thing you know, they'll have another pre-sequel for Warrior Within and Two Thrones.
12/14/09
Was it necessary to make an entirely new game to be placed in a secondary position to provide some starting point to newcomers?
12/14/09
Hope that helped.
12/14/09
I know a sequel to the 2008 game wouldn't make sense, but quite frankly I want to at least hear something about there being a sequel instead of a cash-in for May 2010.
12/14/09
12/14/09
Fragile looks really great, also. And I'm always intrigued by something called "And Yet It Moves".
There's actually a pretty fair amount of stuff I want this quarter, even without Nintendo themselves doing much. Damn!
12/14/09
It's an indie PC game being brought over to WiiWare just like Cave Story and La Mulana. Not sure if you already knew that, though. If so, I apologize!
12/14/09
I really like the amount of stylized puzzle-platforming that seems to be coming to wiiware. Seems to be keeping within the Wii's rep as the retro console, and yet still keeping it somewhat fresh
12/14/09
We'll see how it turns out, but I probably won't play it because I'll likely still be working on FFXIII and Yakuza 3 when it comes out.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Anyway, I'll withhold judgment on this one for now.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
That's a pretty retarded way of thinking, some of the best games ever didn't have good graphics for its time, it is correct for me to asume that you are the kind of person that would play a shitty game if it comes in HD?
Plus, in 2003 when sands of time was released, the graphics were pretty amazing.
12/14/09
There have been 3 "sets" of Prince:
Prince of Persia, PoP2: Sword and the Flame ?, PoP 3D.
Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, Warrior Within, Two Thrones
Prince of Persia (reboot, next gen title).
The Sands of Time's story line is actually a great deal more complicated than the reboot's. With all the time travel, hoping around between games, 7 year gap in between game 1 and 2, and creating alternate timelines, it was a bit tricky to keep track of.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Hope it turns out better than your last endeavor... stupid combat system..
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
They're taking steps to ensure that when AC3 finishes that story then they have something to keep it going.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
A game kind of ruins the idea though...
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Hold on WarioWare D.I.Y?? Sounds too good to be true!
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
S&P2 Spring, Galaxy April-May, Metroid July-Sept., Zelda Nov.-Dec.
Or, at least that's what I'm hoping. I really really really want Zelda for 2010. Since they're showing it at E3 2010, I think the longest we'll have to wait is Spring 2011.
12/14/09
Nintendo will have a pretty packed schedule next year I think.
12/14/09