This is such a massive turn-off. I just can't stand greed of this degree and it should most definitely not be rewarded with a purchase. Up yours, Square Enix!
The game isn't that good to compel me to want to even finish it much less buy more stuff.
Compared to Puzzle Quest it...just wasn't as good of a game. I played PQ for days at a time, many hours per day before I grew tired of the gameplay.
You know, it's just...honestly Bejeweled Twist (which the gameplay here is based on) isn't that fun for me I think. The pacing is slower than other match 3 games which some will say (and I will agree) that it adds a sort of ponderous layer to the moves you make and there's that extra layer of "tactical" choice. But what it gains in 'skillful' play it loses in pacing.
I really thought this game would improve on the idea of puzzle based rpg style games but after all I just feel that this entire little "niche genre" has never improved on the original Puzzle Quest and has just been regressing steadily.
@ryoshi: The issue is a bit more complex.. It's a bit like ordering a four cheese pizza, paying your bill, and the second your pizza gets served, they ask if you want a fifth cheese grated for you by your waiter.
But it costs $1 extra. :(
I'm not sure why it's bad though, the game starts out cheaper and you get options. Buying items to enhance yourself in a singleplayer game - I don't really see how it's much different from buying a strategy guide.
@ryoshi: These extra options are purely designed to rape the consumer's pockets. Sad thing is, people buy into it, and more worrisome yet, people like you don't see a problem with it.
There's no other way about it. It's blatant profiteering and if people continue to buy and not be bothered by it; it's going to get much, much worse and soon entire levels will be day one DLC and real features.
It's just like The Sims 3 undoing 90% of the Sims 2 and its expansions just so they can re-release it for the Sims 3 as DLC and more expansions.
I honestly don't understand how it's tolerated or are all gamers Doctors and Lawyers now?
@masshuum: Here's a major hint for life: businesses? Those things that release videogamese? Yeah, they exist to create profit, not to dispense fun. Call it "blatant profiteering", I'll call it "what companies do". Continue to be pissed off that Square Enix hasn't heeded your pleas and become a charity, I guess.
And your comment is offensively off-base - comparing offering DLC to rape is pretty fucking sick. Guess what? Nobody's forcing you to buy DLC.
@dhimango: They're fun, but they're also products. Where the hell do you live that you get products for free?
Think of it this way - you can't walk into a store and walk out with a loaf of bread without paying for it, and you need food to live. What entitles you to extra options on a videogame for free?
Here's your hint for life. Words have multiple meanings and uses. There's this book based on such a notion called a THESAURUS. Perhaps you've heard of one?
Rape is not just relegated to sexual deviancy. Just like stupidity isn't relegated to just you.
And again, apparently you can not foresee trends in business or how they even work. You're exactly right it's a business and do you really want said businesses to find that it's a great profit model to ship unfinished games? That the first meeting be about any new game is how to make DLC the main platform?
If you give ANY company leeway they'll run with it until it's too late. I am not against all DLC and optional content is perfectly fine.
To be perfectly clear, I don't really care about the DLC in this article, but it still needs to be kept in check. It's a few items now in one game, then another but later it'll be like the Sims 3 where it's a few hundred and it's all fine and dandy because we don't have to buy it. So instead of leading the industry towards a positive future we're leading them down a destructive one simply because people like you would HATE to question them, and when everyone else is sick of it, you'll act like you were against it from the start.
Sheva looks more and more like The Forehead (aka Rihanna) with each new bonus outfit Capcom give her.
I'm a stubborn bastard and don't like paying for shit that should have been in the game in the first place. This new Chris 'n Jill mission SO should have been an unlockable, like how Assignment Ada was in RE4. I genuinely thought you'd get to stomp around the Spencer estate when I saw the flashback in the game, and found it odd you didn't get to. Now I knows why.
I'd rather have some new Merceneries content. Now THAT I'd probably buy. New stages, S.T.A.R.S and RE3 Jill, and Josh as a playable character. Claire would be WICKED too.
Oh bah, couldn't put in an actual Pop Rock song like "Hazel Eyes" could we? I'm not ashamed to admit it, my friends and I have been wanting that song in a music game since the first Karaoke Revolution came out!
My offer still stands. First game to offer a 1968 Mercury Cougar either in-game or as DLC will get my money that I've not spent on a "realistic racing sim" since I bought Forza2, PGR3/4 used.
03:30 PM
03:26 PM
03:05 PM
Compared to Puzzle Quest it...just wasn't as good of a game. I played PQ for days at a time, many hours per day before I grew tired of the gameplay.
You know, it's just...honestly Bejeweled Twist (which the gameplay here is based on) isn't that fun for me I think. The pacing is slower than other match 3 games which some will say (and I will agree) that it adds a sort of ponderous layer to the moves you make and there's that extra layer of "tactical" choice. But what it gains in 'skillful' play it loses in pacing.
I really thought this game would improve on the idea of puzzle based rpg style games but after all I just feel that this entire little "niche genre" has never improved on the original Puzzle Quest and has just been regressing steadily.
03:37 PM
It is nice to find out that it doesn't compare. That and this paid for DLC makes this game an easy one to skip for me.
02:34 PM
Way too slow Square Enix. Way too slow.
03:04 PM
03:13 PM
02:29 PM
02:33 PM
But it costs $1 extra. :(
I'm not sure why it's bad though, the game starts out cheaper and you get options. Buying items to enhance yourself in a singleplayer game - I don't really see how it's much different from buying a strategy guide.
02:50 PM
03:04 PM
There's no other way about it. It's blatant profiteering and if people continue to buy and not be bothered by it; it's going to get much, much worse and soon entire levels will be day one DLC and real features.
It's just like The Sims 3 undoing 90% of the Sims 2 and its expansions just so they can re-release it for the Sims 3 as DLC and more expansions.
I honestly don't understand how it's tolerated or are all gamers Doctors and Lawyers now?
03:10 PM
And your comment is offensively off-base - comparing offering DLC to rape is pretty fucking sick. Guess what? Nobody's forcing you to buy DLC.
03:51 PM
04:04 PM
Think of it this way - you can't walk into a store and walk out with a loaf of bread without paying for it, and you need food to live. What entitles you to extra options on a videogame for free?
04:12 PM
Here's your hint for life. Words have multiple meanings and uses. There's this book based on such a notion called a THESAURUS. Perhaps you've heard of one?
Rape is not just relegated to sexual deviancy. Just like stupidity isn't relegated to just you.
And again, apparently you can not foresee trends in business or how they even work. You're exactly right it's a business and do you really want said businesses to find that it's a great profit model to ship unfinished games? That the first meeting be about any new game is how to make DLC the main platform?
If you give ANY company leeway they'll run with it until it's too late. I am not against all DLC and optional content is perfectly fine.
To be perfectly clear, I don't really care about the DLC in this article, but it still needs to be kept in check. It's a few items now in one game, then another but later it'll be like the Sims 3 where it's a few hundred and it's all fine and dandy because we don't have to buy it. So instead of leading the industry towards a positive future we're leading them down a destructive one simply because people like you would HATE to question them, and when everyone else is sick of it, you'll act like you were against it from the start.
Brilliant.
01:55 PM
I'm a stubborn bastard and don't like paying for shit that should have been in the game in the first place. This new Chris 'n Jill mission SO should have been an unlockable, like how Assignment Ada was in RE4. I genuinely thought you'd get to stomp around the Spencer estate when I saw the flashback in the game, and found it odd you didn't get to. Now I knows why.
I'd rather have some new Merceneries content. Now THAT I'd probably buy. New stages, S.T.A.R.S and RE3 Jill, and Josh as a playable character. Claire would be WICKED too.
01:15 PM
11:38 AM
10:48 AM
11:19 AM
11:37 AM
#speakup
10:21 AM
10:12 AM
09:56 AM
01:26 PM
01:31 PM
Oh, I won't disagree.
GO! DRIFT! WE'LL GIVE YOU POINTS FOR IT. KUUUUDOOOSSS
No, I mean "real" as in has licensed vehicles. Notably my car.
09:45 AM
09:35 AM
09:32 AM
XD.. What a sucky bunch of sucks..
01:37 PM
02:07 PM
I disabled my v-chip so i can now make fun of things i don't know anything about.