Frankly, I think both the 360 and PSwhatever controllers are garbage from an ergonomic standpoint. The 360 may be okay for people with tiny hands (kids, dainty women, etc.) but the one time I picked up a 360-for-PC controller it felt positively dinky in my hands. And the one time I picked up a Logitech PC controller that was based on the design of the Dualshock, I darn near shattered the thing with how fast I had to put it down. Those angled grips are so anti-ergonomic that I think my hands would have felt better if I'd simply dipped them in acid.
Say what you will about pretty much everything else in the Wii system, but the two-piece controller is definitely the way to go. Small hands, large hands, in-between hands, cthulhoid tentacles, it doesn't matter. The controller is however big and whatever shape you want it to be, based on how you choose to pose your arms while playing. Want to have a more traditional experience? Hold them near each other in front of you like a standard two-hand controller. Feel like being more casual about it? Drape one arm over the armrest, and rest the other on your leg. Maybe you're looking for new ways to challenge yourself? Wrap one arm around the back of your neck, and sit on the other one. #art
There's a church around here that's youth oriented with rock music and such. They always have ads at the mall I work at that are basically "Come on, check us out. We're not boring and lame like regular church." But anyway they have one right now that says "Guitars. Because no kid ever played a video game called Church Organ Hero." #guitarhero
Really? I'd rate the shots posted as PG-13... something as risque as that would even get published on PS2 - though I didn't follow the link to the game site. #nsfw
@fuchikoma: Yeah, that extra bit of skin there in the pubic region is nothing more than what may be visible in a small bikini, big deal. That alone wouldn't pull more than a PG-13. #nsfw
The funny thing is the whole 360 pad vs Dualshock argument basically boils down to how big your hands are.
To simplify:
If you have big hands - 360
Small hands - Dualshock
And if like me you find the idea of laying sprawled on the sofa with hands either side of you then the Wiimote is for you. Though I do prefer the dualshock to the 360 as I have small palms and long fingers. #art
@Odin: I find the most comfortable way to hold them varies.
360: Grab it full-on and wrap your hands around it.
DualShock: Set it on your fingers with fairly open hands - it won't fall - really. It takes effort to drop it.
When I hold a DualShock, the heels of my hands aren't even on it. Like that, it's the most comfortable controller I've ever used. The only issue I have is if I'm playing a fighting game for a long time, the underside screw hole near the d-pad makes a hell of a hot spot on the side of my middle finger. #art
@ph15h: Seriously, when I hear ergonomic table, I think curvy. When I think of a curvy table... I remember the ones from the milkbar scenes in Clockwork Orange. Not very utilitarian. #art
Are these stores run by churches, or are they just small businesses (and many times, large businesses) run privately for profit. I know they're not set up inside a church, but they sure seem similar to the money changers in the Temple that so upset Yeshua. #guitarhero
I don't get the big deal...what's wrong with a Christian wearing a shirt that talks about what he believes in?
There are TONS of people who wear marijuana leaves on the shirt because its something they believe in, but I don't see those people getting lambasted for trying to promote something illegal!
Let's face it. The church has always been trying to discover new ways to promote themselves (good, bad, or indifferent), and it's up to the individual to either look at it, accept it, or simply move on.
In this case, it's called parody. Weird Al has been doing it for a long time. Some people swear by him, others can't stand him... #guitarhero
@Maddogdw: i think the point is a lot of people wear really stupid t-shirts and who cares?
be it a pot leaf shirt, or a shirt where someone somehow managed to twist a company's logo around to make it a christian t-shirt. personally, i think the latter shows a complete lack of originality from an artistic standpoint. but, that's just my opinion. #guitarhero
@spatoola: It's not supposed to be original. That's the point here. Here we are, talking about some random t-shirt about God, right? I would say that the mix of pop-culture and religion has obviously worked in this case as far as generating awareness of Christianity, even for the 30 seconds it takes Kotaku readers to read this article. #guitarhero
1) Marijuana is real. The health benefits are tangible and proven.
2) Marijuana is legal for medicinal purposes in many states. It's also straight out legal in one city in Colorado.
3) Christianity, whether you want to hear this or not, is based on nothing more than superstition and sorcery.
Think about it - if you weren't raised in a Christian society and somebody came up to you wanting to talk about his love for a 2,000 year-old magic man who turned water into wine, came back as a zombie, and could send you to a fantasy world if you believed in him, you would call him fucking crazy. At least I would. Who knows. Maybe you're silly.
But you don't. Why? Because you've been raised around it your entire life.
Some people honestly believe in this voodoo witchery nonsense - despite the insurmountable evidence to the contrary.
Others, like myself, tend to think of Jesus as a boss from Left 4 Dead.
That's why wearing a pro-marijuana shirt does not - in any/way/shape/or form - compare to wearing this shirt.
@sqlrob: However, Weird Al does not HAVE to ask for permission. He just does. I don't see this as theft in any way. Does it say 'Guitar Hero'? I think it is a clever play on words. #guitarhero
1) I wasn't getting on the marijuana shirt wearer, just saying that those who wear the shirts tend not to be those who use it for medicinal purposes, or who live in areas where it is legal (I live in PA).
2) Not denying the medicinal benefits, it's just I don't know of many high school kids with glaucoma...
3) You are more than welcome to your opinion on Christianity, however, you shouldn't criticize those who do believe. Truth is, there is more corroborating evidence that the so-called 'magic man' did exist and did the miracles you speak of, not only in the Bible but in many other historical works of the time by those who didn't believe (check out what Josephus had to say, a Jewish historian of the time [en.wikipedia.org])
Of course, there are some questions as to the validity of the text (even to myself), however scholars at least agree that Jesus did exist. There are even more examples of Jesus in texts other than the Bible([en.wikipedia.org]).
So you can view Jesus in any of 3 ways. Either he was a madman capable of doing miracles, a straight up liar, or he was telling the truth.
In my opinion, if he was a madman, then why was he able to baffle the pharisees and religious leaders of the time? Also, ALL of the disciples who claimed his ressurrection from the dead were martyred. I would think at least one of them would have turned around and said that he wasn't resurrected. They had NOTHING to gain by keeping up with the story.
If he was a liar, then why could Pontious Pilate could find no fault in Him with which to crucify Him? Not to mention what was already mentioned about his disciples dying for the cause. It isn't like they were gaining anything for following Christ. In fact, most of them were in prison (multiple times), tortured, maimed, etc. etc. I'm sure that when the Wright brothers started telling people about how they flew through the air that people looked at them pretty crazily and as liars too.
So maybe He was telling the truth...
I can't make that decision for you.
But nonetheless, nothing wrong with wearing the shirt, even if it isn't your cup-of-tea... #guitarhero
However - the first Gospel was written at least 30-40 years after he died. The last (John), was written 70-100 years after his death.
How accurate do you think they were?
The Bible, as we know it today, was compiled between the 2nd 3rd century. [en.wikipedia.org]
And it contains HEAVY EDITING.
It was the Counsel of Nicea where they voted on what Jesus was - man, man/god, spirit, etc. [en.wikipedia.org]
You're bible and your savior we're a product of Democracy. Not Divine Revelation.
It's not that hard.
Mohammad certainly existed - and there is far more historical evidence in his favor than for Jesus. Doesn't mean Allah exists or that anything he said is legitimate.
@SkaHimself: Actually, the Gospels can be seen as very accurate for the time. The relative small amount of time between the history and the writing down is in favor of its authenticity and accuracy. Eyewitnesses would still have been living and could clearly have discredited any false teachings about Jesus. If you look at Alexander the Great for instance, two biographies were written 400 YEARS after Alexander's death by Arrian and Plutarch, and yet scholars still see those as being trustworthy. Material was added centuries after in regards to Alexander to make him legandary, but the 30-40 years past is very negligable in trying to discredit the authenticity of the Gospels. And even that is subject. The book of Acts (written by Luke) ends with Paul under house arrest in Rome. This means that Acts was probably written before Paul was put to death (believed to be appox year 62). Acts was written after Luke, and Luke references Mark, so Mark was written earlier than that! If Jesus died in approx yr. 33, that's at most approx 30 years.
Disagree in heavy editing as well. There are over 24,000 New Testament manuscripts that have been found from multiple geographic locations. Even the Iliad only had 650 manuscripts, and they are from almost 1000 years between the the original and the manuscripts, and that is considered to be authentic. The truth is, the Council of Nicea did not invent the doctrine of the deity of Christ. Instead, the council affirmed and defined what it had found to be the teachings of the Apostles regarding who Christ is; that Christ is the one true God in Deity with the Father. So the question was whether the eye-witness accounts of the Apostles were to be believed.
As for the other men you mention, they never claimed to be the Son of God (and get away with it), nor do they fulfill the Old Testament prophecies. Mohammad wasn't born in Bethlehem, neither was David Koresh or Jim Jones. Jesus was, and fulfilled ALL prophecies foretold of who the Messiah would be. And then of course they all died and didn't rise again like Jesus did.
I'll recommend a book...The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel. He was an atheist who went to discredit Jesus and ended up believing. A good read. #guitarhero
I admit, those always make me giggle. Reminds me of a poster some friends and I came across in New York during Videogames Live a few years back. #guitarhero
@Culebra: Ha, one of those "so good it's bad" kinda things. Like the title of a porn flick I read about called "Weapons of Ass Destruction". Yikes. #guitarhero
@dajungki: My school bus used to drive by the local adult movie theater when I was in grade school, so we would always laugh at the titles of the films. Movie parodies were more rare (this was the 80's) but were usually the funniest, but for my money the all-time best title I saw, because it's kind of understated and yet hilarious, was Rear Admiral. #guitarhero
@(Zombie) Jölan: No, it doesn't.
If it was parodying the subject yes (e.g. if this shirt was "Banjo Hero"). Not parodying the subject loses the protection. #guitarhero
01:47 AM
11/06/09
Say what you will about pretty much everything else in the Wii system, but the two-piece controller is definitely the way to go. Small hands, large hands, in-between hands, cthulhoid tentacles, it doesn't matter. The controller is however big and whatever shape you want it to be, based on how you choose to pose your arms while playing. Want to have a more traditional experience? Hold them near each other in front of you like a standard two-hand controller. Feel like being more casual about it? Drape one arm over the armrest, and rest the other on your leg. Maybe you're looking for new ways to challenge yourself? Wrap one arm around the back of your neck, and sit on the other one. #art
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
[Comments] 277
Oh i'm sure there's a lot of intelligence in this thread... #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
To simplify:
If you have big hands - 360
Small hands - Dualshock
And if like me you find the idea of laying sprawled on the sofa with hands either side of you then the Wiimote is for you. Though I do prefer the dualshock to the 360 as I have small palms and long fingers. #art
11/06/09
360: Grab it full-on and wrap your hands around it.
DualShock: Set it on your fingers with fairly open hands - it won't fall - really. It takes effort to drop it.
When I hold a DualShock, the heels of my hands aren't even on it. Like that, it's the most comfortable controller I've ever used. The only issue I have is if I'm playing a fighting game for a long time, the underside screw hole near the d-pad makes a hell of a hot spot on the side of my middle finger. #art
11/06/09
Sounds like Activision's answer to Sim City. #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
For those of you born around the Beatles time...
That's all I have to say on this matter. #guitarhero
11/06/09
There are TONS of people who wear marijuana leaves on the shirt because its something they believe in, but I don't see those people getting lambasted for trying to promote something illegal!
Let's face it. The church has always been trying to discover new ways to promote themselves (good, bad, or indifferent), and it's up to the individual to either look at it, accept it, or simply move on.
In this case, it's called parody. Weird Al has been doing it for a long time. Some people swear by him, others can't stand him... #guitarhero
11/06/09
be it a pot leaf shirt, or a shirt where someone somehow managed to twist a company's logo around to make it a christian t-shirt. personally, i think the latter shows a complete lack of originality from an artistic standpoint. but, that's just my opinion. #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
Was this licensed from Activision? If not, these shirts are hypocritical.
Weird Al always asks permission, and his works aren't used as advertisement. #guitarhero
11/06/09
You're comparing apples and oranges.
1) Marijuana is real. The health benefits are tangible and proven.
2) Marijuana is legal for medicinal purposes in many states. It's also straight out legal in one city in Colorado.
3) Christianity, whether you want to hear this or not, is based on nothing more than superstition and sorcery.
Think about it - if you weren't raised in a Christian society and somebody came up to you wanting to talk about his love for a 2,000 year-old magic man who turned water into wine, came back as a zombie, and could send you to a fantasy world if you believed in him, you would call him fucking crazy. At least I would. Who knows. Maybe you're silly.
But you don't. Why? Because you've been raised around it your entire life.
Some people honestly believe in this voodoo witchery nonsense - despite the insurmountable evidence to the contrary.
Others, like myself, tend to think of Jesus as a boss from Left 4 Dead.
That's why wearing a pro-marijuana shirt does not - in any/way/shape/or form - compare to wearing this shirt.
(at least this is one reason) #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
1) I wasn't getting on the marijuana shirt wearer, just saying that those who wear the shirts tend not to be those who use it for medicinal purposes, or who live in areas where it is legal (I live in PA).
2) Not denying the medicinal benefits, it's just I don't know of many high school kids with glaucoma...
3) You are more than welcome to your opinion on Christianity, however, you shouldn't criticize those who do believe. Truth is, there is more corroborating evidence that the so-called 'magic man' did exist and did the miracles you speak of, not only in the Bible but in many other historical works of the time by those who didn't believe (check out what Josephus had to say, a Jewish historian of the time [en.wikipedia.org])
Of course, there are some questions as to the validity of the text (even to myself), however scholars at least agree that Jesus did exist. There are even more examples of Jesus in texts other than the Bible([en.wikipedia.org]).
So you can view Jesus in any of 3 ways. Either he was a madman capable of doing miracles, a straight up liar, or he was telling the truth.
In my opinion, if he was a madman, then why was he able to baffle the pharisees and religious leaders of the time? Also, ALL of the disciples who claimed his ressurrection from the dead were martyred. I would think at least one of them would have turned around and said that he wasn't resurrected. They had NOTHING to gain by keeping up with the story.
If he was a liar, then why could Pontious Pilate could find no fault in Him with which to crucify Him? Not to mention what was already mentioned about his disciples dying for the cause. It isn't like they were gaining anything for following Christ. In fact, most of them were in prison (multiple times), tortured, maimed, etc. etc. I'm sure that when the Wright brothers started telling people about how they flew through the air that people looked at them pretty crazily and as liars too.
So maybe He was telling the truth...
I can't make that decision for you.
But nonetheless, nothing wrong with wearing the shirt, even if it isn't your cup-of-tea... #guitarhero
11/06/09
Not denying he existed.
However - the first Gospel was written at least 30-40 years after he died. The last (John), was written 70-100 years after his death.
How accurate do you think they were?
The Bible, as we know it today, was compiled between the 2nd 3rd century.
[en.wikipedia.org]
And it contains HEAVY EDITING.
It was the Counsel of Nicea where they voted on what Jesus was - man, man/god, spirit, etc.
[en.wikipedia.org]
You're bible and your savior we're a product of Democracy. Not Divine Revelation.
It's not that hard.
Mohammad certainly existed - and there is far more historical evidence in his favor than for Jesus. Doesn't mean Allah exists or that anything he said is legitimate.
See David Koresh.
See Jim Jones. #guitarhero
11/06/09
Disagree in heavy editing as well. There are over 24,000 New Testament manuscripts that have been found from multiple geographic locations. Even the Iliad only had 650 manuscripts, and they are from almost 1000 years between the the original and the manuscripts, and that is considered to be authentic. The truth is, the Council of Nicea did not invent the doctrine of the deity of Christ. Instead, the council affirmed and defined what it had found to be the teachings of the Apostles regarding who Christ is; that Christ is the one true God in Deity with the Father. So the question was whether the eye-witness accounts of the Apostles were to be believed.
As for the other men you mention, they never claimed to be the Son of God (and get away with it), nor do they fulfill the Old Testament prophecies. Mohammad wasn't born in Bethlehem, neither was David Koresh or Jim Jones. Jesus was, and fulfilled ALL prophecies foretold of who the Messiah would be. And then of course they all died and didn't rise again like Jesus did.
I'll recommend a book...The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel. He was an atheist who went to discredit Jesus and ended up believing. A good read. #guitarhero
11/06/09
#guitarhero
11/06/09
Accurate, except for the "mindless followers" part, which kinda dismantles the whole diagram. #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I admit, those always make me giggle. Reminds me of a poster some friends and I came across in New York during Videogames Live a few years back. #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
If it was parodying the subject yes (e.g. if this shirt was "Banjo Hero"). Not parodying the subject loses the protection. #guitarhero
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
Fair use requires you do not profit from the use of the material at the very least. #guitarhero
11/06/09