ONLY for Windows Mobile? Microsoft would be insane to do that now, not after they've been slowly losing their userbase for years and have become largely ignored.
Better off making it an app for Android/iPhone/Symbian/WebOS/Windows Mobile....
@ostartero: No, I'm saying that they're insane to support ONLY their platform.
It's best to have a bigger audience than to wall up in their own stagnant town. Not to mention, the vast majority of their Windows Mobile share are of the business users, and not the gamer type, who are more likely to own an iPhone or Android.
@Helba: That's doubtful. Remember they originally charged for "Games For Windows - Live" but eventually had to give that up because PC gamers just weren't biting. If you game on 360 you've got to put up with M$ shenanigans but on PC there's other ways to connect with people so nobody's going to pay them for what they can already do for free.
All these insane "precautions" for "security" are mostly just a huge waste of time and something that just makes the paying customers angry... They forbid you from taking *water* in the plane? Right.
Sounds more like protecting the airport shops and their business more than security of any sort :)
However, plasmid usage is still strictly prohibited.
I haven't flown internationally since 2003, andI'm going to Italy this summer for an archaeological dig. The prospect of flying with all these theatrical precautions-- three ounces of liquid or less, and now the whole stay seated for the last hour nonsense with no iPod or books, God forbid-- is frankly rather daunting.
Okay, I'm not going to talk about how fishy it is for a person that is supposedly on two terrorist watch list with no passport can get on an international flight with "heightened security" that makes women drink their own breast milk.
What I will comment on is how stupid all of this fear mongering is. Instead of real measures that protect passengers and their liberty we get a number of "security measures" accomplish neither goal. Passengers are expected to be early so they can be irradiated and frisked and probed and violated, denied many forms of modern entertainment while they are confined in a tight space over several hours, and mentally assaulted with fear and anxiety as non-existent threats materialize in their heads while a passenger who ate one burrito too many is sick in the restroom.
Thank you, for charging me more money, restricting my choices, and denying me my entertainment and sanity while I fly "the friendly skies".
And just in case you didn't realize, this only applies to "the commoners", as these restrictions don't apply rich people (like just about everything else) who have their own transportation.
This is MADNESS! I mean really, I totally understand 20 minutes with no toilet but an HOUR? What's TSA come to?
Also, I don't see why electronic devices will be affected, from what I read it doesn't seem like such items were used in the event on that Delta flight. So I see no good reason why the TSA needs to ban them.
@_Forsight: Honestly if people can put 2 and 2 together they should be able to figure it out just by your mentioning of Bioshock and the event that this article is referring to.
Owen Good promoted this comment
Sylar will take the power from Crecente's hair was starred
Sylar will take the power from Crecente's hair was unstarred
@Owen Good: While I made the picture quickly in response to my predicament, yes, that is a real error message, as in the picture above.
It seems editors have the ability to lock "threads" in order to prevent promotion of a comment. I've seen it one other time with Brian Crecente, but that was it, honestly.
@(Starman) Zuul~!: I had it in one of the podcast threads last week with Totilo but thought nothing of it and figured I'd come back later. I never did. Whoops.
@James Henderson: I'm wondering whether it's an inherent glitch, or a "feature."
Just like how the editing of our comments removes our picture is considered a cut above the rest, this is probably a "feature" from the almighty nostril of Nick Denton.
It's quite the amusing perspective to see 200+ comments from people going on about how much they "don't care" about Duke Nukem.
And while I'm sure that most of them genuinely don't care about the future of the franchise, people angrily, vocally "not caring" in high volume still counts for something.
As long as it's not like any of the god awful 3rd person perspective Duke games on PS1 and N64, I'd be interested to see where the series goes, if it ever does go anywhere.
I suppose you could count me squarely in the category of people who don't necessarily "care" about Duke, but would certainly be open to a sequel to Duke 3D if it turned out to be good/fun.
Flew from NY to Florida today with hardly any changes. They wanted to see my ID at the gate (normally my boarding pass is sufficient) and there was talk on the flight of not storing any electronics in the seat pocket - they should be stowed away when not in use.
Otherwise it was business as usual: pointless disrobing at the security gate and unbelievably rude airline staff.
I work in the airline industry, so im expecting just as much if not more fun when i head back to work tomorrow.
And for anyone who wonders how they plan to enforce these no standup/no items last hour rules.
Try it. We actually think its funny when pilots call in, we get police and they drag people off the plane. And yes, they can and will do this in the middle of flight, stopping anywhere close to get rid of ya.
Flight attendants word is law on the plane as far as most captains go.
Try not to make their lives any more difficult. We hate this shit as much as you do but its our job
This makes me yearn for the days my dad talks about. Back when flying meant dressing like you were going for a nice dinner, not like you rolled out of bed 5 minutes ago, and it was part of the fun of vacation, not simply a means of travel like the bus. I'm taking a 7 hour non-stop in a few weeks to the Caribbean. If this is going on I'm going to get stir-crazy.
As if flying anywhere wasn't already obnoxious enough.
I will probably get some disagreement, but I would rather stomach the infinitesimally small chance of someone trying to attack than have the entire nation (including myself) inconvenienced in such a massive way. This goes for all the extra security measures, not just this new electronics "ban".
Every time you do anything in life, you're taking a risk. I would be surprised if you looked at the numbers and found that you weren't more likely to die while driving your car, walking down the street, etc, as compared to being on a plane that was hijacked.
For the most part all increasing restrictions are going to do is inconvenience the general populace.
As for those that are actually trying to sneak in explosives or weapons they will just come up with more creative ways to do it. Thats how it is both online and in the real world.
@UltimatePancakeSensation: I agree 100%.
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~Ben Franklin
@si1vergecko: It's just like game protection. The more annoying and intrusive it gets, the less the innocent consumer wants the original product, and the harder the pirates try and break it.
12/30/09
Better off making it an app for Android/iPhone/Symbian/WebOS/Windows Mobile....
12/30/09
They're not "insane" to support their own platform.
12/30/09
It's best to have a bigger audience than to wall up in their own stagnant town. Not to mention, the vast majority of their Windows Mobile share are of the business users, and not the gamer type, who are more likely to own an iPhone or Android.
12/30/09
Not to mention that the sales you pointed out are for a specific quarter in a specific year.
The iPhone has less than 6% of the American market.
So I think my point still stands.
12/30/09
12/30/09
7 might be Microsoft's lucky number as Windows 7 is the best OS i've ever used. I love it. Lets hope WM7 is the same way :D
12/30/09
*spits at ground*
12/30/09
12/30/09
12/30/09
First a console, then phones, then the applications that use both start popping up on PC and start requiring a subscription.
12/28/09
Sounds more like protecting the airport shops and their business more than security of any sort :)
12/28/09
I haven't flown internationally since 2003, andI'm going to Italy this summer for an archaeological dig. The prospect of flying with all these theatrical precautions-- three ounces of liquid or less, and now the whole stay seated for the last hour nonsense with no iPod or books, God forbid-- is frankly rather daunting.
12/28/09
What I will comment on is how stupid all of this fear mongering is. Instead of real measures that protect passengers and their liberty we get a number of "security measures" accomplish neither goal. Passengers are expected to be early so they can be irradiated and frisked and probed and violated, denied many forms of modern entertainment while they are confined in a tight space over several hours, and mentally assaulted with fear and anxiety as non-existent threats materialize in their heads while a passenger who ate one burrito too many is sick in the restroom.
Thank you, for charging me more money, restricting my choices, and denying me my entertainment and sanity while I fly "the friendly skies".
And just in case you didn't realize, this only applies to "the commoners", as these restrictions don't apply rich people (like just about everything else) who have their own transportation.
edited for spelling.
12/28/09
Seems that most all heard the general outrage and unrealistic demands that these would place on people. And the electronic thing is a little much.
12/28/09
Also, I find the image you've been using for these TSA updates ironic, Owen.
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
Though I don't see why there was a ban in the first place, the Airliner attack didn't have any electronics involved, or so I read.
12/28/09
Also, I don't see why electronic devices will be affected, from what I read it doesn't seem like such items were used in the event on that Delta flight. So I see no good reason why the TSA needs to ban them.
I'm so glad I don't fly very often.
12/28/09
12/28/09
Finally, lap dances and dodge ball competitions mid air are back.
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
good thing I have already played and don't recall that screen.
12/28/09
Oh god no Owen, you didn't! D:
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
It seems editors have the ability to lock "threads" in order to prevent promotion of a comment. I've seen it one other time with Brian Crecente, but that was it, honestly.
[farm3.static.flickr.com]
12/28/09
12/28/09
Weird. Like everyone else is off today but me. I don't know why this thread would be demoted.
12/28/09
12/28/09
But, who knows—
OH MY GOD A STORK aaaaaaah
12/28/09
12/28/09
Just like how the editing of our comments removes our picture is considered a cut above the rest, this is probably a "feature" from the almighty nostril of Nick Denton.
12/29/09
*spoiler*
But the fact that the guy is an activated sleeper that "would you kindly" takes the plane down. That's not unveiled until near the end.
12/28/09
And while I'm sure that most of them genuinely don't care about the future of the franchise, people angrily, vocally "not caring" in high volume still counts for something.
As long as it's not like any of the god awful 3rd person perspective Duke games on PS1 and N64, I'd be interested to see where the series goes, if it ever does go anywhere.
I suppose you could count me squarely in the category of people who don't necessarily "care" about Duke, but would certainly be open to a sequel to Duke 3D if it turned out to be good/fun.
12/27/09
12/27/09
12/28/09
12/27/09
Seriously, an hour of no toilet? WTF!
12/27/09
Otherwise it was business as usual: pointless disrobing at the security gate and unbelievably rude airline staff.
12/27/09
And for anyone who wonders how they plan to enforce these no standup/no items last hour rules.
Try it. We actually think its funny when pilots call in, we get police and they drag people off the plane. And yes, they can and will do this in the middle of flight, stopping anywhere close to get rid of ya.
Flight attendants word is law on the plane as far as most captains go.
Try not to make their lives any more difficult. We hate this shit as much as you do but its our job
12/28/09
Ah ha, noted.
12/27/09
12/27/09
I will probably get some disagreement, but I would rather stomach the infinitesimally small chance of someone trying to attack than have the entire nation (including myself) inconvenienced in such a massive way. This goes for all the extra security measures, not just this new electronics "ban".
Every time you do anything in life, you're taking a risk. I would be surprised if you looked at the numbers and found that you weren't more likely to die while driving your car, walking down the street, etc, as compared to being on a plane that was hijacked.
12/27/09
Agreed.
For the most part all increasing restrictions are going to do is inconvenience the general populace.
As for those that are actually trying to sneak in explosives or weapons they will just come up with more creative ways to do it. Thats how it is both online and in the real world.
12/27/09
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~Ben Franklin
12/27/09