Whether you like Battle.net or not, you are going to have to use it. I highly recommend setting up a free email address to use as your login, though. Beloved did and is already getting spam from gold sellers and keylogger on this address which has never been used for anything else.
I'm still leaving it until the last minute. Given the recent problems for those that bit the bullet early and merged their accounts I feel better waiting. Once it's mandatory they'll be forced to keep right on top of those issues.
Wow a Penguin, woopie doo! It'll take more than that to win me over to transfer my account to battlenet. I haven't had a active account for over a year now, so unless I get free playing time then no thank you Bliz.
Only have the first WoW, no expansion and one character that's lvl 19 so NO BIG LOSS for me if I have to start over and buy a new account. Because by the time I'll get one is once they release the complete package with all the expansion for a REASONABLE price (which probably never in my life time).
@biggerx: I played the beta and I did own a account with higher lvl but for the life of me I can't figure out my user name and email that I used at the time. I think I used Excite email but I'm pretty sure that account is long and gone.
I'm just saying that it really should be a mandatory thing for WoW accounts to be integrated with Battlenet but a voluntary one and by doing that you'll get the penguin pet (which everyone will have :rolls eyes). By threatening that I'll loose my WoW account or can't play it if I don't. It doesn't fair well with me because then I'll be expected to do a another hassle in the future or lose my account again. Would I be upset because of this, well for this game not really but it's the principle of it and well because I didn't invest too much back into the game when I bought a new account. I know eventually someone will point out the stupid ToS clause. If it was something that was seamless like how STEAM did their upgrades then it wouldn't really matter but as a PC gamers with multiple accounts with multiple gaming log in, I do not feel that I need to create a new one for something I already did when I first created it.
Also calling me a scrub just because I'm not into WoW really shows your character as a person. I feel pity for you and hopefully you'll grow up in time.
@MikeRox: I'm not in the UK, I'm in the US. I might wait until the next expansion comes out and if it's still reasonably priced I'll get it. It's just that I'm not into MMOs like I was use to and I can't sit playing hours on end either, I must be getting old :p.
@Neko_Tech:
So you're complaining that you need to do a 5 minute registration process (for free I might add) if you ever want to go back to your crummy account. Just to note you won't lose it but simply won't be able to play til you merge.
Seriously big whoop, a quick signup is hardly a hassle.
@Covertghost:
@Odin:
Who cares if it's free, would you want HIV/AIDS if I offer it to you for free?
The Battlenet 2 was a optional thing before now it's mandatory. I don't care that it takes 1min or 5min to set up the account for something that I've already registered for. To set up another account that I have to keep track of just so Acti/Bliz makes sure that I don't sell my account (I don't but that's beside the point).
I'd be laughing my ass off if Battlenet 2 falls apart and they end up dropping it and revert to the old system.
I don't care for BN2, I'm not saying it isn't good and I'm sure it'll add many services that people will like. But I don't see why people like me who don't care to have the extra (mostly social networking) have to create a account again on something that already works. Why can't they have both is beyond me? I mean would it hurt you the gamers if it were a optional choice?
@Neko_Tech: "To set up another account that I have to keep track of..."
The point that you may be missing is that this does not give you one more account to manage, as it is simply replacing one you've already got. And if you ever plan to buy any Blizzard games in the future, it actually reduces the number of different accounts for you to juggle, by consolidating them into a single one.
@jesterspawn: I know if you have other Blizzard games it'll be easy to keep track of like how STEAM does it. Fine I got the idea (I never said it didn't, I just have WoW) but it seams that most of you replying back are just going with the flow. I'm not trying to get oh they should stop it, NO I never said that at all. It's great that they're doing something that might benefit most gamers but I don't see why that it has to be mandatory. Also note that I KNEW what Valve was doing with STEAM when they first started going all digital on how it may be great on how one account does all but yet severely limiting your rights as a gamer and consumer.
@pressstart: I never said I thought highly of myself. I'm just stating out that WE should have a CHOICE. If you haven't noticed that overall companies these days don't give us choices anymore.
@rageofthemage: After a good rest and coming back to read that made me LOL. Don't say that I don't have a sense of humor and I do understand both side of the coin but most have forgotten to look at it both sides and what it means to us as a consumer and as a gamer. People are just going along with Blizz just because most people think they can do no wrong (like STEAM).
I'm not afraid of change, but come one the new Battlenet2 only support 3 (4 if you count the new MMO they've been working on) games and that doesn't sound like it's worth it using a single account integration for. If they (Blizz) actually had more games and if somehow it uses not only Blizz games but Activision then I may see the point.
@To all the rest: I'm not trying to STOP Blizz at all but I was just speaking out my mind but apparently most of you readers take it way to personally. I know I have a choice to follow or not and most likely I wouldn't because it's not for me but I did not state that YOU and EVERYONE should do the same.
Here's my a point, let's say you have a WoW account and Diablo 3/Starcraft 2 also tied in (when released) and you have multiple computers. You bring one of your friend over and they want to try out D3 or SC2 since they're not into MMO. You let them try it and while you let them play, you wanted to play WoW, well since it's tied to your account only one of you can play those games. Yes I know that may not happen to a lot of you but for people who have siblings or significant others it will be a hindrance.
My only complaint about Battle.Net is the forced e-mail address as the username. I prefer actual usernames over e-mail addresses, in case I don't use a service for a while. Much easier to just type "bob42" or whatever then tons of old e-mail addresses trying to remember what one it was.
@drakino: I don't know about you but it's always easier for me to remember an actual email address rather than a username that I might have tweaked if the site I was using already had it taken...
At first I was going to be mad about ActiBlizzion forcing me to join their evil battle.net conspiracy. Then I saw that there was a FAQ, and all was fixed.
"You can play in offline mode if you want - I just don't think you're going to want to. You'll be giving up lots and lots of features, and why would you want to be giving up features?"
Am I the only one that feels slightly creeped out by this statement? Sounds like something your neighbors would say if you live in a over perfect town where everyone has a smile all the time.
"You don't have to come to the X-mas party if you don't want to. But I just think you'll regret it.... You'll be missing out on lots of good food and X-mas singing. I also will be making eggnog, you don't want to miss my eggnog. :) "
@Hardcore: ....what? what alternative?
I don't play online since I'm an antisocial bastard that hates getting his ass handed to him by some snotty nosed kid.
@KhaiJB: If you don't play online then you probably don't care about achievments... so what exactly is going on inside that head of yours if you think that missing achievments makes the game cut down?
@Teran: who said anything about achivements? all he said was "features" - what features? if they are achivements, I don't care. if it's gameplay features, I do care.
Why does everyone hate the internets all of a sudden? We all know that the internets makes ur games betterer. Its not like anybody whos going to play SCII doesnt have the internets. Everyone has the internets. ESPECIALLLY SCII nerds.
Chill out dooders, There can has lots of fun on the internets. Stop hating on the tubes, they needs u to live.
"Blizzard tells Shacknews it's working on a "pseudo-LAN" solution to the problem, that might allow play very similar to a regular LAN party, with Battle.net only being pinged once or periodically for authentication purposes."
@Frogbot: Can always go back to wailing about how this may not come out until summer 2012 :)
(Which, coincidentally is AFTER the end of the world according to the Mayans, so this could possibly be some huge government plot to keep placated and docile until then instead of complaining about how they aren't building huge underground vaults for all of us to hide in.)
@Yossarian: Summer 2012 is a few months before the end of the Mayan calender (21, Dec, 2012)
And a few months before Abstergo get their hands on subject 17.
@Yossarian: Nope, the end of the world according to the Mayans will actually be around the 21st December 2012, so we can have Starcraft for a good few months before imminent and certain death, every cloud...
@Frogbot:
Original Kerrigan VA not being chosen to come back for SC2? Really not a lot coming to mind right now since BlizzCon is over. Haven't heard anything from Activision or Valve in awhile. No random pretentious indie dev saying anything. Madden already came out, and Luke took care of the sports games in his post...
10/14/09
In other words, Battle.net is not secure.
10/14/09
10/14/09
Only have the first WoW, no expansion and one character that's lvl 19 so NO BIG LOSS for me if I have to start over and buy a new account. Because by the time I'll get one is once they release the complete package with all the expansion for a REASONABLE price (which probably never in my life time).
10/14/09
10/14/09
I'm just saying that it really should be a mandatory thing for WoW accounts to be integrated with Battlenet but a voluntary one and by doing that you'll get the penguin pet (which everyone will have :rolls eyes). By threatening that I'll loose my WoW account or can't play it if I don't. It doesn't fair well with me because then I'll be expected to do a another hassle in the future or lose my account again. Would I be upset because of this, well for this game not really but it's the principle of it and well because I didn't invest too much back into the game when I bought a new account. I know eventually someone will point out the stupid ToS clause. If it was something that was seamless like how STEAM did their upgrades then it wouldn't really matter but as a PC gamers with multiple accounts with multiple gaming log in, I do not feel that I need to create a new one for something I already did when I first created it.
Also calling me a scrub just because I'm not into WoW really shows your character as a person. I feel pity for you and hopefully you'll grow up in time.
@MikeRox: I'm not in the UK, I'm in the US. I might wait until the next expansion comes out and if it's still reasonably priced I'll get it. It's just that I'm not into MMOs like I was use to and I can't sit playing hours on end either, I must be getting old :p.
10/14/09
10/14/09
So you're complaining that you need to do a 5 minute registration process (for free I might add) if you ever want to go back to your crummy account. Just to note you won't lose it but simply won't be able to play til you merge.
Seriously big whoop, a quick signup is hardly a hassle.
10/14/09
@Odin:
Who cares if it's free, would you want HIV/AIDS if I offer it to you for free?
The Battlenet 2 was a optional thing before now it's mandatory. I don't care that it takes 1min or 5min to set up the account for something that I've already registered for. To set up another account that I have to keep track of just so Acti/Bliz makes sure that I don't sell my account (I don't but that's beside the point).
I'd be laughing my ass off if Battlenet 2 falls apart and they end up dropping it and revert to the old system.
I don't care for BN2, I'm not saying it isn't good and I'm sure it'll add many services that people will like. But I don't see why people like me who don't care to have the extra (mostly social networking) have to create a account again on something that already works. Why can't they have both is beyond me? I mean would it hurt you the gamers if it were a optional choice?
10/14/09
The point that you may be missing is that this does not give you one more account to manage, as it is simply replacing one you've already got. And if you ever plan to buy any Blizzard games in the future, it actually reduces the number of different accounts for you to juggle, by consolidating them into a single one.
10/14/09
@pressstart: I never said I thought highly of myself. I'm just stating out that WE should have a CHOICE. If you haven't noticed that overall companies these days don't give us choices anymore.
@rageofthemage: After a good rest and coming back to read that made me LOL. Don't say that I don't have a sense of humor and I do understand both side of the coin but most have forgotten to look at it both sides and what it means to us as a consumer and as a gamer. People are just going along with Blizz just because most people think they can do no wrong (like STEAM).
I'm not afraid of change, but come one the new Battlenet2 only support 3 (4 if you count the new MMO they've been working on) games and that doesn't sound like it's worth it using a single account integration for. If they (Blizz) actually had more games and if somehow it uses not only Blizz games but Activision then I may see the point.
@To all the rest: I'm not trying to STOP Blizz at all but I was just speaking out my mind but apparently most of you readers take it way to personally. I know I have a choice to follow or not and most likely I wouldn't because it's not for me but I did not state that YOU and EVERYONE should do the same.
Here's my a point, let's say you have a WoW account and Diablo 3/Starcraft 2 also tied in (when released) and you have multiple computers. You bring one of your friend over and they want to try out D3 or SC2 since they're not into MMO. You let them try it and while you let them play, you wanted to play WoW, well since it's tied to your account only one of you can play those games. Yes I know that may not happen to a lot of you but for people who have siblings or significant others it will be a hindrance.
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
To clarify, I approve of Kadin's comment.
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/14/09
10/13/09
It's good to see that Blizzard is confident enough for a full fledged switcheroo to battle.net.
But would it be weird to see battle.net turn into steam? Include games other than ones developed by Blizzard?
10/13/09
10/13/09
Competition isn't a bad thing.
I was able to register all the cd keys for all the blizzard games I have and they let you download the game files from the website which was cool.
08/25/09
08/25/09
Am I the only one that feels slightly creeped out by this statement? Sounds like something your neighbors would say if you live in a over perfect town where everyone has a smile all the time.
"You don't have to come to the X-mas party if you don't want to. But I just think you'll regret it.... You'll be missing out on lots of good food and X-mas singing. I also will be making eggnog, you don't want to miss my eggnog. :) "
08/25/09
08/26/09
08/24/09
I'll be giving this a miss.
08/24/09
08/24/09
I don't play online since I'm an antisocial bastard that hates getting his ass handed to him by some snotty nosed kid.
what did you mean?
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
Chill out dooders, There can has lots of fun on the internets. Stop hating on the tubes, they needs u to live.
08/24/09
The idea is that if you have a bunch of friends over for a LanParty, you don't want to have internet for all of them.
08/24/09
08/24/09
Because I'm playing on a laptop where i can't get wi-fi you idiot.
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09
I for one am still pissed about that one.
08/24/09
[www.joystiq.com]
"Blizzard tells Shacknews it's working on a "pseudo-LAN" solution to the problem, that might allow play very similar to a regular LAN party, with Battle.net only being pinged once or periodically for authentication purposes."
08/24/09
(Which, coincidentally is AFTER the end of the world according to the Mayans, so this could possibly be some huge government plot to keep placated and docile until then instead of complaining about how they aren't building huge underground vaults for all of us to hide in.)
08/24/09
08/24/09
And a few months before Abstergo get their hands on subject 17.
08/24/09
08/24/09
Original Kerrigan VA not being chosen to come back for SC2? Really not a lot coming to mind right now since BlizzCon is over. Haven't heard anything from Activision or Valve in awhile. No random pretentious indie dev saying anything. Madden already came out, and Luke took care of the sports games in his post...
08/24/09
08/24/09
(disclosure: Deanbmmv is the deputy-CEO of Vault-tec)
08/24/09
08/24/09
08/24/09