You're completely wrong on all counts.

1) You're just talking out of your ass with this one. The controls are just as precise as every other RTS ever made, which is to say if you click on something, something happens.

2) The British play completely differently than any other faction. They can pick up and move any of their major bases to wherever they want and can build trenches which no other faction can. Depending on which doctrine you use, each faction can play completely differently even from itself.

3) Unit lethality? Have you seen what anti-tank guns do to tanks? Mobile artillery barrages? What a V1 rocket does to anything?

4) Diverse builds? It's set in WW2. You only have so much you can do with history. I know, they should have had hover tanks, just like Hitler's super secret Panzerfuzz division.

5) There's online rankings and you level up with each faction as you win. E-sports I couldn't give a shit about because I don't live in Korea.

Saying CoH, which won multiple game of the year awards and universal critical appeal (Metacritic score: 93 Universal Acclaim) is a bad RTS just because you're stuck on Starcraft is just ridiculous.

CoH is in my opinion the best RTS ever made, bar none. There have been other RTSs I've enjoyed over the years, most notably Age of Empires II, Empire Earth, Black & White 2, and even Sins of a Solar Empire, but I just keep coming back to CoH. The way the resources are spread around the map into victory points is just brilliant, and the way the units react/take cover/rear armor shit/etc. makes the experience that much better. Then, you call in a V-1 rocket and it's just fucking awesome. Whatta great game.

It'll have full keyboard/mouse support a year later when it's released for PC (hopefully not exclusively to Vista like Halo 2 before it).

DNF, not DKF. Man, nut soo gud wif typig 2day.

good-bye

Wow.

Last time I checked, stating an opinion wasn't whining. And my opinion is completely valid -- a person's line of sight to the the horizon allows you to see more notes coming in less space with your eye. You have to adapt? Is this social Darwinism or videogames? Because, if all you have to do is adapt, well there's a lot of games that get put down for horrible controls or interfaces that are actually awesome now. Thanks for pointing that out. Daikatana wasn't horrible, you just have to adapt to the shittiness. Spider-Man 3's camera wasn't horrible, it's just too refined for your dull palatte. And Lair? Lair has the best controls of any game ever made! You just have to adapt!

Also, how exactly do you know what kind of gamer I am? I know what kind of gamer you are ... a presumptuous douche.

shouldn't release

Damnit.

By that rationale, they should release Batman: The Dark Knight because some asshole with a camcorder somewhere is making bootleg DVDs. Go ahead, cut off your nose to spite your face.

Um, I hate to tell you, but over 70% of the country is on the Bush-sucks bandwagon. I mean, where have you been the last eight years.

I'm more concerned that Vista sucks and they're moving up the next Windows version to be released sooner.

And the new trend for extra in-game items, especially in MMOs, just sucks. It's like a $10 microtransaction built into the game.

I was under the impression it was originally a 3rd person rts-style game, based upon the original trailers.

But honestly, Halo's balance in MP, as far as weapon/vehicle choice, would be totally screwed if they added CoD4-style leveling. I think that Halo's mp is fine the way it is.

But there's no way I could resist, either.

I stand corrected.

Why then didn't Sony just show a new SOCOM? They already have the brand identity and loyalty, where is the new SOCOM already?

No wonder Sony thinks the PS3 is a ten year platform, it's going to take them that long to finish all the games (and Home).

Oh, you just don't understand. It's a spin-off of the old Faggot Show, like the Muppet Babies. N00b. Personally, I'm waiting for Faggle Rock.

@Corrin:

You'll have to let me know what the banhammer feels like.