What an incredibly annoying, pretentious, ignorant and fucking pathetic turd this guy is.
The real problem here is he is only relevant because people pay attention to him. It sad an asshole like this can be on tv so long but they take off the air actual good shows.
The one and only good thing to come out of jersey shore is the southpark episode where they fucking ripped that show apart.
So guiness is now just trying to hip themselves up with kids to attract attention basically is what this list is. Guiness used to be about records set and broken, but this is just a poll and nothing else. You can find thousands of this exact same poll on google, so why would I care what the poll at guiness says?
If they get rid of those fucking awful articulation points (creviced knees, gaping chest pivot and ugly ball elbows/ankles) and give it a good paint job and Ill buy one. Pending it doesnt cost a fortune like most noteworthy figures now a days.
Of course it has that many because they been merging old EA accounts into it and forcing people to use it. All their games now require it, so even if a person wants to play a single player game they still have to create and use a origin account.
Besides who cares? They dont have shit for games on it while steam has the go to selection and has really good sales. I dont care for either because I despise digital content and dont like having to run a program to play a game I paid for, but steam is the superior choice.
Just what we need, more beggers.
"Look guys we want to make this game so we can sell it to you later. Yeah we dont know what it is, you dont know what it is, you dont know if it will be any good and we havent told you anything about it but would you please just give us money? We cant make games that do well enough for us to make our own money but we still want some."
This is such a bad idea, begging for money. What if activision asked people to give them money, you all would tear them a new ass. But here is a company who cant make anything that makes a profit so they ask people to give them money to make a product they can then sell you later on. So youre basically paying them twice. And even if the game is released free its still been paid for, only in this case its been paid for before they even started working on it.
Yes yes thats exactly what we should be doing is just giving money to companys who cant earn it given multiple oppurtunities to do so.
If they make a good game Ill buy it, but Im not going to give them money so they can make something to sell me later. Or give them money when I have no idea what it is they are making.
What does this have to do with gaming? If someone strangles someone with an extension do you think sites that electricians frequent post the story because it has to do with lighting and electricity? Or if a man kills another man with a frying pan do you think cooking blogs post the story?
Besides the headline says wired controller blamed. I read the article and no where in it did anyone blame the controller cable for causing this. What the hell kotaku? Every time any crime happens anywhere that even mentions a game you guys bend the headline and post it even if it has NOTHING to do with gaming. Like your story about how a man died in the street outside of a game store, so what? Or the story about the guy getting stabbed when someone broke in his house while he was playing his 360?
Whats next you going to post a story "gamestop causes car accident and kills 3!" but then the actual story is about a car accident happening on a road down the street from a gamestop.
What a joke.
So they are basically saying "hey guys, we need you to give us money so we can make a game to sell you later".
Even if the game they make ends up being free it was still paid for by donations. If the game is free essentially a lot of people just paid for a product they dont know a thing about or even if it will be any good.
If say activision said "were having a fund raiser for the next call of duty game" you guys would be tearing your way across the internet to rip them a new asshole for doing exactly what double fine is doing, asking customers for money so they can fund a product to sell you later.
If a company makes a good product they will make money to make more products, thats how it works. But because tim schaffers name is there its ok for them to say "Our products havent sold that great. Would all of our customers please just give us money so we can make something else?". Thats not how it works, if you make things and cant afford to make more then your company has failed at making products.
Just ask stardock, they werent big or well known and made sins of a solar empire with no advertising or anyone knowing much about it but it sold big because it was so good. Brutal legend didnt sell well because it was a mediocre 6 hour (well 40 if you actually did every boring ass mini game that you drove between in a car with terrible control) that was on magazine covers, had articles on every game site, for fucks sake jack black was on the tongiht show promoting the game and it still tanked because it wasnt very good. But did stardock beg for money? Nope.
Anyone who donated money is a moron because they all got weepy over a company begging for free cash.
Like I said if activision did this youd all throw a fit and NO it isnt different if they did.
What a joke.
So they are basically saying "hey guys, we need you to give us money so we can make a game to sell you later".
Even if the game they make ends up being free it was still paid for by donations. If the game is free essentially a lot of people just paid for a product they dont know a thing about or even if it will be any good.
If say activision said "were having a fund raiser for the next call of duty game" you guys would be tearing your way across the internet to rip them a new asshole for doing exactly what double fine is doing, asking customers for money so they can fund a product to sell you later.
If a company makes a good product they will make money to make more products, thats how it works. But because tim schaffers name is there its ok for them to say "Our products havent sold that great. Would all of our customers please just give us money so we can make something else?". Thats not how it works, if you make things and cant afford to make more then your company has failed at making products.
Just ask stardock, they werent big or well known and made sins of a solar empire with no advertising or anyone knowing much about it but it sold big because it was so good. Brutal legend didnt sell well because it was a mediocre 6 hour (well 40 if you actually did every boring ass mini game that you drove between in a car with terrible control) that was on magazine covers, had articles on every game site, for fucks sake jack black was on the tongiht show promoting the game and it still tanked because it wasnt very good. But did stardock beg for money? Nope.
Anyone who donated money is a moron because they all got weepy over a company begging for free cash.
Like I said if activision did this youd all throw a fit and NO it isnt different if they did.
What a joke.
So they are basically saying "hey guys, we need you to give us money so we can make a game to sell you later".
Even if the game they make ends up being free it was still paid for by donations. If the game is free essentially a lot of people just paid for a product they dont know a thing about or even if it will be any good.
If say activision said "were having a fund raiser for the next call of duty game" you guys would be tearing your way across the internet to rip them a new asshole for doing exactly what double fine is doing, asking customers for money so they can fund a product to sell you later.
If a company makes a good product they will make money to make more products, thats how it works. But because tim schaffers name is there its ok for them to say "Our products havent sold that great. Would all of our customers please just give us money so we can make something else?". Thats not how it works, if you make things and cant afford to make more then your company has failed at making products.
Just ask stardock, they werent big or well known and made sins of a solar empire with no advertising or anyone knowing much about it but it sold big because it was so good. Brutal legend didnt sell well because it was a mediocre 6 hour (well 40 if you actually did every boring ass mini game that you drove between in a car with terrible control) that was on magazine covers, had articles on every game site, for fucks sake jack black was on the tongiht show promoting the game and it still tanked because it wasnt very good. But did stardock beg for money? Nope.
Anyone who donated money is a moron because they all got weepy over a company begging for free cash.
Like I said if activision did this youd all throw a fit and NO it isnt different if they did.
They might as well made the cover all white and had the words "video game" in black across it.
What a joke.
So they are basically saying "hey guys, we need you to give us money so we can make a game to sell you later".
Even if the game they make ends up being free it was still paid for by donations. If the game is free essentially a lot of people just paid for a product they dont know a thing about or even if it will be any good.
If say activision said "were having a fund raiser for the next call of duty game" you guys would be tearing your way across the internet to rip them a new asshole for doing exactly what double fine is doing, asking customers for money so they can fund a product to sell you later.
If a company makes a good product they will make money to make more products, thats how it works. But because tim schaffers name is there its ok for them to say "Our products havent sold that great. Would all of our customers please just give us money so we can make something else?". Thats not how it works, if you make things and cant afford to make more then your company has failed at making products.
Just ask stardock, they werent big or well known and made sins of a solar empire with no advertising or anyone knowing much about it but it sold big because it was so good. Brutal legend didnt sell well because it was a mediocre 6 hour (well 40 if you actually did every boring ass mini game that you drove between in a car with terrible control) that was on magazine covers, had articles on every game site, for fucks sake jack black was on the tongiht show promoting the game and it still tanked because it wasnt very good. But did stardock beg for money? Nope.
Anyone who donated money is a moron because they all got weepy over a company begging for free cash.
Like I said if activision did this youd all throw a fit and NO it isnt different if they did.
What a joke.
So they are basically saying "hey guys, we need you to give us money so we can make a game to sell you later".
Even if the game they make ends up being free it was still paid for by donations. If the game is free essentially a lot of people just paid for a product they dont know a thing about or even if it will be any good.
If say activision said "were having a fund raiser for the next call of duty game" you guys would be tearing your way across the internet to rip them a new asshole for doing exactly what double fine is doing, asking customers for money so they can fund a product to sell you later.
If a company makes a good product they will make money to make more products, thats how it works. But because tim schaffers name is there its ok for them to say "Our products havent sold that great. Would all of our customers please just give us money so we can make something else?". Thats not how it works, if you make things and cant afford to make more then your company has failed at making products.
Just ask stardock, they werent big or well known and made sins of a solar empire with no advertising or anyone knowing much about it but it sold big because it was so good. Brutal legend didnt sell well because it was a mediocre 6 hour (well 40 if you actually did every boring ass mini game that you drove between in a car with terrible control) that was on magazine covers, had articles on every game site, for fucks sake jack black was on the tongiht show promoting the game and it still tanked because it wasnt very good. But did stardock beg for money? Nope.
Anyone who donated money is a moron because they all got weepy over a company begging for free cash.
Like I said if activision did this youd all throw a fit and NO it isnt different if they did.
I dont know about anyone else but when I think DOTA I think warcraft 3. I always have and it still seems odd to me when I see valve using the name.
What a joke.
So they are basically saying "hey guys, we need you to give us money so we can make a game to sell you later".
Even if the game they make ends up being free it was still paid for by donations. If the game is free essentially a lot of people just paid for a product they dont know a thing about or even if it will be any good.
If say activision said "were having a fund raiser for the next call of duty game" you guys would be tearing your way across the internet to rip them a new asshole for doing exactly what double fine is doing, asking customers for money so they can fund a product to sell you later.
If a company makes a good product they will make money to make more products, thats how it works. But because tim schaffers name is there its ok for them to say "Our products havent sold that great. Would all of our customers please just give us money so we can make something else?". Thats not how it works, if you make things and cant afford to make more then your company has failed at making products.
Just ask stardock, they werent big or well known and made sins of a solar empire with no advertising or anyone knowing much about it but it sold big because it was so good. Brutal legend didnt sell well because it was a mediocre 6 hour (well 40 if you actually did every boring ass mini game that you drove between in a car with terrible control) that was on magazine covers, had articles on every game site, for fucks sake jack black was on the tongiht show promoting the game and it still tanked because it wasnt very good. But did stardock beg for money? Nope.
Anyone who donated money is a moron because they all got weepy over a company begging for free cash.
Like I said if activision did this youd all throw a fit and NO it isnt different if they did.
Ill order me a copy off amazon now. I didnt want this when I heard they didnt include the original voices.
Glad they left them in though. Marys voice sounds better in the original personally, I associate her old voice with her character though since I played it so many times.
What a dick move. "Yes we have a demo unit, but you cant play it unless you pre order one first". Thats as fucking stupid as when lamestop lets you have access to a demo after you pre order the game. Why would I want to demo something I am buying? I want to demo it before I buy it. I know its not every location but just the fact lamestop will let their employees pull shit like this off sickens me. Reason number 54667 as to why I wont shop with them anyway.
Besides, I pre ordered with newegg cause I get free shipping and no tax in my state. So when I ordered it at 249.99 thats exactly what I pay. Plus they ship faster and have delightful customer service people if I have a problem and thats 2 of many things lamestop doesnt have.
Newegg, amazon and ebay will be getting all my vita business. Just like they do for all my other gaming needs.
Id be tempted to go down, pre order one, play with it and then get my money refunded.
I prefer my women to be built like women and not 16 year old boys.
Well the direction was better than what simon west did with the real movies and that girl is prettier than angelia jolie ever was, that is to say she looks like she has a body of a woman and not a 16 year old.
Looks like Ill be going back. Maybe I can play my mage, he was 79 last time I was in there. Had a 65 necro, 65 beastlord and a 72 warrior as well.
That was the beauty of EQ, it has the best mmo community ever. It was fun to play with others, didnt matter what you were doing because EQ had a real sense of community no other mmo has ever had. It REQUIRED you play with others, it forced people to help eachother because it was so damn hard it was like a 2nd job you pay to work at. But that difficulty forged friendships easily and players got to know eachother. Back in the day EQ didnt have griefers or people who just wasted your time, they were there to play.
