Ruh-roh. That would not be a good sign for reviews. Maybe next someone will go after 1up, you know besides Gabe from Penny Arcade.

I'm still waiting for Kotaku or some other site to do an honest to god exposé of the bribes taking place within the industry to get journalists to say what the companies want them to say.
I've aways had a respect for Gerstmann's reviews and would hate to think he was being punished for his honesty.

Reviews are bogus. I hear Kane and Lynch rules.

I hope that isn't true. If it is, that's pathetic and "teh gaeming prass" is even more illegitimate than we all thought.

I lawl'd

IGN are currently pissed at Gabe for having the temerity to disagree with their review of Assassin's Creed.

IGN gave Mario Kart: Double Dash a 7.9. Can I get Matt Cassamassina fired please?

I call BS!!!

But I'm sad cause I want that fat punk to get fired...

If this is true, there is no excuse for it and it's an utter shame and embarassment not only to Cnet and Gamespot, but to Eidos. Can't take a bad review then don't make a bad game. This is especially disconerting as a reader of GameSpot who enjoy's Jeff opinion and thoughts most of the time. And I hate to burst that fanboy bubble, but his 8.8 for Twilight Princess wasn't too far off what i thought, when you take originality into consideration.

Let's hope this is certainly not the case, as it's utterly embarassing for tons of people.

just like the film industry and their pen of 'quote-whores' (Peter Travers, anyone?), the gaming-review-sector is now facing the same pressure.

i mean, videogames have, over the last year or so, moved from a little sidebar in Daily Variety to a couple of cover stories. (This being a single example of how gaming in general has recently 'blown up' in the entertainment industry as a whole)

that means dollars, and from those dollars come suits with vices for parent companies' heads.

and thus the era of the Honest Videogame Review soon came to an end...

sad, if this is true.

sad, but not shocking in the slightest.

We've heard an unsettling rumor today from an anonymous tipster that longtime game reviewer Jeff Gerstmann from Gamespot has been let go.

Hmm...
FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!! FUCK YES!!

Sorry, but he pissed me off ever since the TP review.

If the review is the only thing that got him fired, then he Gamespot is simply digging their own grave. Those kind of moves dont usually work too well in the long run.

maybe he was taking bribes to give some games good reviews and others bad...not to say kane and lynch is good or bad....just saying

My approval of his firing is up for corporate sponsorship. Please email.

shame he's gone... he was the few that had any enthusiasm when reviewing... I hope they get rid of that guy on 1Up though.... I don't know his anem but he really annoys me. ah well.

Good Riddance. Twilight Princess definately deserved an 8.9. What was he thinking?

If he was fired over the "tone" of his review thats pretty messed up.

I would be surprised if this sort of thing never happened before...

I Lawl'd in actuality because I just got done reading "News Flash" by Bonnie M. Anderson which is basically a call for a change in modern journalistic practices.

Something is a up. Admins have been locking these topics instead of the normal moderators.

[www.gamespot.com]

Penny arcade is on the ball: [www.penny-arcade.com]

Am I the only one who thinks no one should care?

@Cruithne: Yeah, and apparently he wasn't even talking about their review specifically. Gabe pissing people off is awesome.

I'll take Luke's review of AC any day rather then have someone blow smoke up my ass. I don't have to agree but if it's how you feel about something for fuck sake be honest.

@Ghostyghost: yeah im a fan of jeff too.personally agree with his most of his views on games and his reviews.i think i would watch less of on the spot and listen less to the hotspot if jeff wasnt on them.till eventually i just stop going to gamespot like i did long ago with ign.

A 6.0 really is what the game deserves, i just finished it last night, and while it had a few moments of brilliance it DESPERATELY needed some gameplay tweaks.

For one i wish it was like gears in the cover department, press a button to cover, the one used in the game is spotty at best, and hard to use.

Next, they needed to work on the weapons a bit, they are inaccurate and hard to use, making the game a lot more tedious than it needs to be.

There where also pacing issues, a difficulty curve that wasn't a curve but more a collection of impassable walls, and more.

This would be pretty big news over at the GameSpot forums and offices if this turns out to be true... especially how Jeff hosts most of the video features and is the head game-reviewer. I would say with 99% certainty that this rumour is bogus, except the fact that Kotaku is reporting it and I would like to believe that you guys wouldn't report on any ol' rumour submitted to your email.

So all things considered, I'm 98% sure it's bogus, not 99.

So, let this be a lesson to you reviewers on the sites. They take bribes in advertising (like it didnt show on IGN with the Xbox Wreckless review a few years ago when it was the first game to have site conversion advertising), and anytime a fanboy group doesnt get 9.5's on their favorite game ... booyah!

YOUR FIRED!!!

I'll really miss him on "The Hotspot" podcast if this is true; now that's an energetic and funny podcast (say what?!!). I tend not to read reviews anymore but I do follow games that interest me up to the day I buy them (usually during releases).

Jeff's criticisms of Kane and Lynch were fair in my opinion, even having not played the game I trust his judgement. I think Gerstman is an excellent contributor in the industry and Gamespot's HotSpot podcast will not be the same without his humor. He is a critic and as such should be entitled to his opinion and ad dollars should have nothing to do with what he is allowed to say..... I think this is completely bogus and I will write CNET saying so if this is found out to be true. I value honest appraisals of games, and I partly agree with Gabe's assessment of Assassin's Creed. The free running rocks, the combat is not so hot. In summation this is total bull if Jeff lost his job over something like this.@Cruithne:

Everyone has known that you buy good reviews for years. Games "journalists" have zero integrity to start with when it comes to star ratings. Most of these so-called journalists will only ever "report" on press releases anyway. Which is why I come to Kotaku.

@MooseMuffin: I love the PA comics but "Gabe" is quite the ass for taking time out of his day to shit on reviews that didnt mirror how he felt about Assassin's Creed.

If this is true, then I would refuse to read any review from that site ever again. That would utterly destroy whatever credibility the site had.

Let me just say this to all the people who are seriously suggesting he ought to lose his job for having an opinion you don't agree with.

You're a twat, get off the internets, the quota's already full.

No, besides the fact that he is not very good at reviewing games, this sort of shit should not happen. Ever.

@Spidermonkey: WOW... you don't like his opinion so you are celebrating a what may be a personal disaster for him... you are full of win!

At least he was let go for doing something cool. Fighting the system.

All the Zelda fanboys who cried like babies over the 8.8 fiasco can now sleep happy at night.

One of the reasons I like GameSpot is how you actually SEE the writers. They had a whole lot of community interaction that you don't see on other sites.

@Cruithne:

NO U

but seriously, they are not stupid enough to fire him for this reason. If he was fired, it was for a reason, they are not stupid enough to fire him for something that could get them bad publicity.

IGN's review of Assassin's Creed seemed almost to score it spitefully in frustration rather than fairly. It had issues, but none that should have dropped it into the 7s range, as well as to go so far as to literally dissuade people from buying it.

I recognized that, though, and anyone has the power to recognize points that aren't legitimate, as well as points that are strong in opinion and could easily be disagreed with.

I didn't read the Kane & Lynch review on Gamespot, but his reviews seem to line up without too much deviation from the averages, so I can't imagine that he's completely unprofessional in his reviews.

I suppose I would have to see the 'tone' of the review to truly judge. If it was anything like that pulled Neverwinter Nights 2 1UP review, then I'm glad this guy was axed. If not, something's not right here.

I've pretty much given-up on game reviews as a whole. The only thing I ever listen to much now is Zero Punctuation since its unabashedly truthful on what's not-done well in a game. I can judge if I want or not based on how much bad there is.

When Halo 3 and BioShock started getting 10's is when I realized just how far into the crapper gaming journalism had gone.

@okenny :):

No, I hate how he purposely rated both versions of the game under 9.0, and he was too hard on it.

this fucking sucks

Hey, Cresente, I think you might have a potential guest editor on hand for the future!

I visit Gamespot often, guess I'm going to have to take them off the list. In politics, companies are a major source of problems for average, middle-class Americans. It's sad to see them intrude in the game industry as well.

@NumberONE:
if you read gabes response the review he was talking about was 1ups not igns.

oh and to further my support for jeff, IF jeff got fired because he refused to be bought and gave a game a review it deserves gamespot will lose all credibility and 1 less reader.

dear kotaku,
you guys need to review more games because im running out of sites to read =(

and thats why i don't bother with reviews

@NumberONE:

I read the post, and that's not at all what he did. He said he thought the reviews were off, and after his experimentation he figured out why: Deadlines mean you have to finish the game, not enjoy it. You miss the enjoyment in a game, you're likely to be more critical of it.

@Cruithne:

beat me to it.

"Oh noes! Someone on teh internet didn't like my favorite game? He deserves to die!"

get a life, I think metal gear solid is boring and played 15 minutes of RE4 before never touching it again. Sue me.

@steverl22: @Spidermonkey: what the? why are you people still so pissy that twilight princess got an 8.8, like that's a bad score? it wasnt the best freakin' zelda game, and its not like he gave it a 4 or something.

this kind of response, hoping a reviewer is let go for disagreeing with your franchise of choice - much less saluting the possibility of him being fired for not fluffing his reviews here - man, if the next gen of gaming is all EA rushed shit, this kind of mentality's gonna be partly to blame.

@Cruithne: thank you.

@Kai_: I would say that 6 is very generous...the game reminds me of hitman with someone tagging along and you have too give them orders.

@Spidermonkey:

You have some issues. Seriously!

Gloating over what could be a personal disaster to someone?

Over a f*cking fanboy video game review.

You win at the Internet!

This should come as no surprise. Many (not all) reviewers take bribes for higher review scores and Jeff Gerstmann has always been controversial.

I am wholeheartedly disappointed by Gamespot, if this is true. Unfortunately, we will likely never know the truth.

I don't know what reviews I can trust...
Never liked Gamespot, haven't liked ign for a while, I even distrust metacritic.
Good thing I have my mood watch to tell me how I feel every day.

His TP review had a lot of contradictions. Like saying the Wii version is "the version to get" yet giving it a lower score. Or saying the Wii controls are more precuse in the GC version and saying the Wii controls aren't that great in the Wii version.

Meh, whatever.

@EnigmaNemesis:

Oh shut up please, I grow tire of seeing nothing but snide and "witty" remarks from you.